• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Channels of Technical Progress
- entrepreneurial activity making marginal improvements



- investment in R&D




- technology transfer

Factors conductive to technical progress
- the process of innovation - creative destruction - (good ideas are generated that replace bad ideas)

- equitable societies have larger pools of entrepreneurs


- legal protection to entrepreneurs


- good governance


- good communication networks

Two country model of technology transfer
- The US spends a lot more in R&D than other countries and yet some European countries have managed to keep up their standard of living close to the US

- through technology transfer


- pages 215-223 in text



Two country model of technology transfer

key assumptions:

the cost of copying goes down as the technology gap between the follower and the leading country widens
two country model of technology transfer

key result:

In steady-state the two countries will grow at the same rate
Is the technology leader necessarily better off than the follower?
- No

- Technology leader may be more productive but also devotes a higher fraction of labor force to R&D. This means it has a smaller fraction producing output


- If imitation is cheap, then the follower could be better off than the leader.

Barriers to technology transfer
- technology developed in developed countries may not be appropriate for the developing countries. For example, a capital intensive technology may not be suitable for a capital scarce country



- poor countries may lack skills to implement the foreign technology