Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
12 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Dothard vs Rawlinson (77)
|
permissible to ban women from working in certain sections of prisons deemed especially dangerous
|
|
|
Grummet vs Rushen (84)
|
womens right to empowerment in all male institutions recognized as taking precednce over inmates rights to privacy
|
|
|
in re gault (67)
|
juveniles accused of crime for which institutional commitment was possible have the right of 1. fair notice of charges, 2. representation by counsel, 3. face accusers; + cross examine, 4. priviledge against self incrimination
|
|
|
in re winship (70)
|
standard of proof used in criminal court(beyond reasonable doubt) was applicable to juveniles in delinquency hearings
|
|
|
breed vs Jones (75)
|
person adjudicated delinquent cant be later put at risk in criminal court for the same act
|
|
|
roper vs simmons (05)
|
unconstitutional to sentence anyone to death for a crime they committe while younger then 18
|
|
|
furman vs georgia (72)
|
death penalty as administered constituted cruel and unsual punishment
|
|
|
gregg vs Georgia (76)
|
court upheld new capital punishment status that had more careful decision making and more modern methods of execution
|
|
|
McLesky vs Kemp (87)
|
court rejected challenge to georgias death penalty law on grounds of racial discrimination
|
|
|
atkins vs virginia
|
execution of the mentally retarded is unconstitutional
|
|
|
thompson vs oklahoma (88)
|
cannot execute someone who was under 16 at time of offense
|
|
|
stanford vs kentucky (89)
|
can execute someone who was 16 or 17 respectively at time of crime
|
