• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)

Schenck v. United States

Illegal for citizens to interfere w military operations. CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TEST

Gitlow v. New York

States can limit speech

Tinker v. Des Moines

School can only limit symbolic speech if it is a real interference w school functions

Texas v. Johnson

Flag burning is ok bc it is symbolic speech

US v. O'Brien

Destroying of government property is not protected by the first amendment and is not symbolic speech

Near v. Minnesota

Press can publish libel statements

NO PRIOR RESTRAINTS


LIBEL

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier

School can limit freedom of press due to the fact that it is not a "public place"

School rules different from world

NYT v. Sullivan

Press can publish libel statements that have no actual malice

Actual malice

NYT v. US

Freedom of press can not be violated by vagueness of security

Everson v. Board of EDU

States can fund private school in unreligious aspects

Engel v. Vitale

There can be no religion in schools

Wallace v. Jefferson

No prayer in school

Lemon v. Kurtzman

Providing aid for private schools violated the establishment clause

LEMON TEST


secular purpose?


Enhances religion?


Excessive entanglement w religion? IF ANY YES THEN STATES CANT

Reynolds v. Us

Right to free exercise of religion does not exempt you from lawas

POLYGAMY

Employment division v. Smith

Gov't can punish those using illegal drugs for religious reasons

McDonald v. Chicago

Right to bear arms second amendment incorporate to states

Wolf v. Colorado

Exclusionary rule does not apply to states

Mapp v. Ohio

Incorporated exclusionary rule. No illegally obtained evidence is admissible in state courts

New Jersey v. TLO

School can search with reasonableness whenever

Veronica school district b. Acton

Students can be searched under reasonable suspicion under any time

Miranda v. Arizona

Suspects must be informed of their 5th and 6th amendment rights before interrogation.

DUE PROCESS

Benton v. MD

Double jeopardy incorporated to states. Violates 5th amendment rights.

Gideon v. Wainwright

Right to counsel through the incorporation of due process

Furmam v. Georgia

Capital punishment can only be given w limitations and specificity

Gregg v. Georgia

Capital punishment is no unconstitutional

Roper v. Simmons

Capital punishment can not be given to minors

Miller v. Alabama

Kids can not have life in prison

Griswold v. Connecticut

States can not interfere w family matters/ marital privacy

Roe v. Wade

Abortion is a fundamental right encompassed in the right to privacy

Planned parenthood v. Casey

States can not add limitations to abortion to a point where the limitations are burdensome

University of California v. Bakke

Quotas can not be used when accepting students. Race can be a factor

Gratz v. Bollinger

In this case affirmative actions are unconstitutional bc they used points. Equal protection clause states that race can not be a factor