Study your flashcards anywhere!

Download the official Cram app for free >

  • Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

A key: Read text to speech.a key

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Marbury v Madison
established judicial review
midnight judges appointed by adams
power of SUpreme COurt enlarged
McCulloch v Maryland
established national supremacy
established implied powers
use of elastic clause
state unable to tax federal institution
gitlow v NY
established precedent of federalizing the bill of rights (applying them to states);
states can't deny freedom of speech
Baker v Carr
one man one vote
ordered state legislative districts to be as nearly equal in population as possible
warren court's political judical activism
Marbury v Madison
established judicial review
midnight judges appointed by adams
power of SUpreme COurt enlarged
McCulloch v Maryland
established national supremacy
established implied powers
use of elastic clause
state unable to tax federal institution
gitlow v NY
established precedent of federalizing the bill of rights (applying them to states);
states can't deny freedom of speech
Baker v Carr
one man one vote
ordered state legislative districts to be as nearly equal in population as possible
warren court's political judical activism
baker v carr
one man one vote
ordered state legistive districts to be as nearly qual in population as possible
westberry v sanders
order house legisltive districts to be as mearly equal in poplation as possible
us v nixon
allowed for executive proveledge but not when criminal case is involved
schnck v us
communist plamplets; freedom of speech cna be limited durign wartimes
tinker v des moines
blcka arbands protect due to freedom of speech
us v obrain
no draft card buring
brandenburg v ohio
kk rally; dangerous peech protected
miller v california
obscenity and porn
obscenity standards determined by each local area
texas c johnson
you may burn the american flag
ny times v us
publicaiton of pentagon papers