• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
INTERNAL VALIDITY
Allows an investigator to determine if there is a causal relationship between independent and dependent variables.
Threats to Internal Validity (8)
1. Maturation
2. History
3. Testing
4. Instrumentation
5. Statistical Regression
6. Selection
7. Attrition (Mortality)
8. Interactions with selection
Maturation
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Any biological or psychological change that occurs within subjects during course of study as function of time, is not relevant to the research hypotheses, and affects the status of most subjects on the dependent variable in a systematic way.
Examples of Maturation
Fatigue, boredom, hunger, physical and intellectual growth.
History
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Threatens a study's internal validity when an external event systematically affects the status of subjects on the dependent variable.
How is History controlled
by including more than one group in the study and randomly assigning subjects to groups.
Testing
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Taking a test can alter a person's performance on the test when it is readministered. Testing can threaten internal validity whenever exposure to a test might alter the subjects performance on subsequent tests.
Instrumentation
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Changes in accuracy or sensitivity of measuring devices or procedures during the study can confound the study results.
Statistical Regression
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Tendency of extreme scores on a measure to "regress" toward the mean when the measure is readministered to the same group.
Selection
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Whenever the method used to assign subjects to treatment groups results in systematic differences between groups at the beginning of the study.
Attrition (mortality)
**Threat to Internal Validity**
Poses a threat to internal validity when subjects who drop out of one group differ in an important way from subjects who drop out of another group.
Interactions with selection
**Threat to Internal Validity**
When groups are initially nonequivalent, selection can act alone or can interact with other factors to threaten a study's internal validity.
Name the Threats to External Validity (4)
1. Interaction between testing and treatment
2. Interaction between selection and treatment
3. Reactivity
4. Multiple Treatment Interference
Interaction between testing and treatment
**Threat to External Validity**
The administration of a pretest can "sensitize" subjects to the purpose of research study and alter their reaction to the independent variable.
Name two ways to control for Interaction between testing and treatment
1. Not administering a pre-test
2. Solomon four-group design (enables investigator to measure the impact of pretesting on both internal and external validity of study).
Interaction between selection and treatment
**Threat to External Validity**
Subjects included in research study can have characteristics that make them respond to the independent variable in a particular way. When this occurs, the results of the study cannot be generalized to people who don't have those characteristics. (i.e. When subjects are volunteers, they tend to be more motivated than non-volunteers and consequently more responsive to the IV).
Reactivity
**Threat to External Validity**
Research participants can respond to the independent variable in a particular way because they know their behavior is being observed.
Demand Characteristics (Included in category of Reactivity)
Cues in the experimental setting that inform subjects of the purpose of the study or suggest what behaviors are expected of them.
Multiple Treatment Interference (Order effects, Carryover effects)
**Threat to External Validity**
When a study involves exposing each subject to two or more levels of the IV (within-subjects design) the effects of one level of the independent variable can be affected by previous exposure to another level. When this occurs, the results of the study cannot be generalized to situations in which people are only exposed to one level of the independent variable.
How can Multiple Treatment Interference be controlled?
Counterbalanced design (i.e. Latin Square)
What is a Counterbalanced Design
Used to control multiple treatment interference, when different subjects receive the levels of the independent variable in a different order.
A study's ___ validity is limited by its ___ validity, but a high degree of ___ validity does not guarantee ___ validity
A study's external validity is limited by its internal validity, but a high degree of internal validity does not guarantee external validity