Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
72 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Case Study
|
Deliberate study of an individual, organization, group, or a natural phenomenon. The changes that occur are observed and learned about.
|
|
Histories
|
The life history of individual ppl, organ., or nat phenom. May include data and viewpoints- free to include opinions and judgements.
|
|
Stories
|
Promote understanding and learning by standing for something else. Usually contains a moral.
|
|
Plot
|
Organizational structure of a narrative. Includes complication and resolution.
|
|
Resolution
|
The final event or change in the narrative plot.
|
|
Setting
|
The specific location of the narrative.
|
|
Complications
|
The building up of small events or changes and their relations to e/o arouses curiosity.
|
|
Characters
|
Used as a point of personal identification for reader. Not always people.
|
|
Essential Narrative Elements
|
1. Movement through time
2. Change |
|
Bookend Stories
|
The same story is used in the introduction and conclusion.
|
|
Descriptive Definitions
|
The established and conventional usage of the word. (Mouse- rodent)
|
|
Predescriptive Definitions
|
Created for brand new terms.
(Mouse- computer accessory) |
|
Classification
|
Knife: Tool, Instrument
Generalizations |
|
Differentation
|
Knife: Sharp Blade, Used to Cut
Characterisitics |
|
Verbal Examples
|
Create vivid, easily remembered image of the term.
|
|
Sensory Examples
|
Examples that you can see, hear, touch, smell, or taste.
|
|
Secondary Definitions
|
Define typical sub-categories that make up the whole term.
Ex: Happiness- exhilaration, contentment, joy |
|
Exemplar
|
An Example such as a model or archetypical example.
|
|
Nonexemplar
|
Example of what the term is NOT.
|
|
Physical Properties
|
1. Places
2. Structures 3. Objects 4. Living Organisms |
|
Parts, Whole, and Their relationship
|
Focusing on one of the component parts at a time and then moving on to the next.
|
|
Ladder of Abstraction
|
A continium of descriptions of the same thing from the most abstract to the most concrete.
|
|
Spatial Categories
|
Structures, places, and objects in a spatial or geographical organization.
|
|
Sensory Categories
|
1. How it looks
2. How it smells 3. How it sounds 4. How it feels 5. How it tastes |
|
Same class Comparison
|
The two things seem alike at first glance
|
|
Different Class Comparison
|
The two things initally seem different from e/o.
|
|
Types of Comparison speeches
|
1. To explain complex ideas and processes.
2. To explain common experiences in a new way. 3. To assist audiences in making choices |
|
Organizational patterns for comparison speeches
|
Divided and alternating patterns
|
|
Divided Pattern
|
Name two things being compared and then list all the features or criteria for one thing and then for the other.
|
|
Alternating Pattern
|
You list the two things being compared under the lists of compatible features
|
|
Selection of Items for Comparison
|
1. The two items must have significant similarities
2. One element must be familiar to audience 3. Must be able to support it 4. Not to intermix diff things 5. Make new and fresh |
|
Lower level supporting claims
|
Must represent natural divisions of the main points they support
|
|
Supporting claims
|
Main points are subdivided into these
|
|
Second level supporting claims
|
Supporting claims are divided into these
|
|
Support materials
|
Narratives, Descriptions, Explanations, Definitions, Examples, Lists, Quotations, and Specific Facts.
|
|
Introduction Transition
|
1. General Background about the topic such as a history, explanation, definitions.
2. The relevance of the topic for the audience 3. The background of the speaker |
|
Plan of speech
|
The last section of the Introduction. Announcement of the thesis and main points.
|
|
Extemporaneous
|
Speaker does not write the speech word for word
|
|
Memory enhancing variables
|
1. Motivations to remember information
2. The nature of the information to be remembered 3. The understanding of the meaning and relationship of the information 4. Repetition and rehearsal of the information |
|
Memory enhancing strategies
|
1. introduce intrinsic and extrinisic awards
2. use vivid language 3. use humor 4. make content meaningful 5. point out/ make associations 6. incorporate repetition |
|
Explanation
|
Change the nature of the information from meaningless to meaningful
|
|
Association
|
Increases the liklihood of remembering
|
|
Extrinsic rewards
|
rewards come from another person or agen and include material awards such as cupcakes, money, trophies, prizes. Nonmaterial things like prestige, praise, grades, power.
|
|
Intrinsic rewards
|
Come from yourself such as self-satisfaction, increased self esteem, and greater personal independence
|
|
Self Evident Claims
|
Meaning of the words make up the claims, or the form of something.
ex: rectangles have 4 sides an eye is an eye |
|
Empricial Claims
|
Depend on the observation of things in this world for their truth
ex: carrots grow underground |
|
Direct observation
|
Speaker appeals to listener's senses to make a claim acceptable.
|
|
Testimony
|
statement of fact or opinion
|
|
Expert opinion
|
given on subjects for which ther seems to be no right answer
|
|
soft evidence
|
expert opinion because there is no single right answer
|
|
hard evidence
|
statistics and factual data
|
|
circumstantial evidence
|
consists of accompanying or attendant facts, events, or conditions that point to a claim
|
|
Argument
|
speaker expresses an arguent whenever a claim is asserted and other claims are offered as reasons in support of it
|
|
premise
|
a claim that provides a reason for accepting another claim, the conclusion.
|
|
Conclusion
|
a claim that isi implied or follows from the premises
|
|
Premise indicators
|
after all, and, and a matter of fact, because, by contrast
|
|
Conclusion indicators
|
as a result, consequently, hence, it follows that, so therefore
|
|
data
|
informative claims that provide basis for the conclusion
|
|
warrant
|
claim that explains the connection of the data to the conclusion
|
|
qualifier
|
indicates the degree of support for the conclusion
|
|
serial argument
|
abc, cde, efg, ghi
|
|
linked argument
|
abc, def, ghi
conlusion: c,f,i |
|
deductive reasoning
|
conclusion follow with certainty from its premise
|
|
inductive reasoning
|
provides only probable support for the conclusion
|
|
valid
|
the premise and conclusion are true
|
|
invalid
|
the premise or conclusion are false
|
|
sound
|
agrument is valid
|
|
unsound
|
argument is invalid
|
|
causal argument
|
warrants that assert the existance of a relationship btwn 2 or more events such that one event leads to another
|
|
sign arugment
|
warrants the make connections btwn things
ex: doorbell |
|
arument by inductive generalization
|
and inference made from a subset of a population, called a sample, to the whole of the population
|
|
agrument by analogy
|
we infer that things frozen yogurt is good to eat bc ice cream is good to eat and they are alike
|