• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Recap
Language = form of social action
examines how people construct their world through accounts and descriptions
focuses on
=> construction
=> variability
=> function (action-orientation)

examines how function is achieved
=> rhetorical devices (objectivity, disclaimers, stake management etc.)

Critique:
=> too narrow focus on the immediate interaction linguistic devices
=> politically limited
Discourse Analysis 2 main approaches
1. Discursive Psychology (e.g. Potter and Wetherall, 1987)

2. Faucauldian DA (e.g. Parker, 1992)
History of FDA Michel Faucault
French philosopher, 1926-1984
Focus on power relations and ideology in society
Ideology = set of ideas, beliefs, understandings which support the interests of the dominant groups

Book – Discipline and punish (1977)
maintaining social order...
French philosopher, 1926-1984
Focus on power relations and ideology in society
Ideology = set of ideas, beliefs, understandings which support the interests of the dominant groups

Book – Discipline and punish (1977)
maintaining social order through discipline and surveillance
not all power is ‘top-down’
‘disciplinary power’ operates through surveillance and observation
Eg Panopticon (Bentham 1785) – The prisoners become their own guards
Regulation through self-discipline
Subjectivity structures
Gender
Age
Social relations (sons, daughters, siblings, parents, friends, acquaintances, customers, service providers etc.)
Social class
Nationality
Embodiment (disability, body shape, ethnicity, gender)
Institutions (families, school, university, hospitals, church, state)
HIERARCHIES (dominant groups)
Eg. 1 – Masculinity / Masculinities
Dominant (hegemonic) masculinity (Connell, 1995)
=> Identity (“real men”)
=> Practices (“what real men do”)
=> Hegemonic discourses support and maintain the interests of the powerful

These discourses make the dominant interests appear legitimate
So…. being a man = negotiating ‘hegemonic masculinity’
Discourses
For Foucault, discourses are practices that systematically shape notions, concepts, characteristics, social phenomena etc.
not just linguistic (may be images, things, buildings, actions etc.).
=>FDA – conducted “wherever there is meaning” (Parker, 1999, p. 1)
in language:
=> ways in which a topic is talked about
=> statements which come together to produce both meanings and consequences in the real world
Effects of discourses
shape the way in which a topic is understood and represented = different constructions of a topic)
e.g. single motherhood, intelligence, sexuality etc.

produce ways of seeing the world and ways of being in the world (Willig, 2001)

dominant (hegemonic) discourses:
entrenched, taken-for-granted views of the world
maintain power relations
Discourses
“From a Foucauldian point of view, discourses facilitate and limit, enable and constrain what can be said, by whom, where and when” (Willig, 2001, p. 107)

ways of organising, regulating social life
are bound up with institutions – (re)produce institutions and institutional practices - e.g.:
=> Medical discourses
=> Family discourses
=> Sexuality
=> Education
=> Parenting
E.g 2 - Health and medicine discourses
Medical discourses:
=> patient = passive recipient of expert care
=> doctor = expert, active, powerful
=> patient’s body may be exposed, touched, invaded in processes of treatment

Public health discourse:
=> Public health as means of (self) government
Effects of discourse
Discourses have real consequences for how men & women experience self in relationships…
=> prescribe behaviours
=> produce masculinity & femininity as objects
 … thus they construct subjectivity … and they embody power relations
Summary
Examines:

the discursive resources available within a culture (e.g. hegemonic discourses, what passes for ‘common sense’)

their implications
=> who benefits
=> who is disadvantaged

subjectivity:
=> What ways of being (thinking of ourselves, behaving) are open/closed?
Comparison between DA and FDA