• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/43

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

43 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Define a grammar school

Academic. Top 20% of 11+ results go there mainly m/c

Define secondary modern

Offered a non-academic practical curriculum. 75% of kids went there. Focused on delivering manual skills. Largely made of the w/c

Define technical school

5% of kids went here.


Intended for kids who had an interest in vocational and technical subjects. Mainly w/c boys

Tripartite system in contemporary society A03

163 grammar schools 5% of secondary pupils are in grammar schools. 100,000 kids sit 11+ each year. Grammar schools do better. But surrounding schools do worse

Strengths of tripartite system

Universalistic standards parsons


Promotes meritocracy


Role allocation Davis and Moore


Children can work at the pace right for them


Secondary education is now free


W/C opportunities

Weaknesses of the tripartite system

Class differences


Legitimates class inequality


Ideological state apparatus


Doesn’t encourage creativity and individualism


SPF and labelling

Weaknesses of the tripartite system

Class differences


Legitimates class inequality


Ideological state apparatus


Doesn’t encourage creativity and individualism


SPF and labelling

What are the two main aspects of comprehensive education

Catchment area and setting and stteaming

Weaknesses of the tripartite system

Class differences


Legitimates class inequality


Ideological state apparatus


Doesn’t encourage creativity and individualism


SPF and labelling

What are the two main aspects of comprehensive education

Catchment area and setting and stteaming

Catchment areas

Catchment areas designated area around a school. Students who live in it can attend the school. Certain people have priority:


Siblings


SEN


Parent works in the school


Pupil premium


Looked after children

Weaknesses of the tripartite system

Class differences


Legitimates class inequality


Ideological state apparatus


Doesn’t encourage creativity and individualism


SPF and labelling

What are the two main aspects of comprehensive education

Catchment area and setting and stteaming

Catchment areas

Catchment areas designated area around a school. Students who live in it can attend the school. Certain people have priority:


Siblings


SEN


Parent works in the school


Pupil premium


Looked after children

Strengths of setting and streaming

Work can be tailored


Encourages competition


Promotes meritocracy


Different classes can sit different exams

Weaknesses of the tripartite system

Class differences


Legitimates class inequality


Ideological state apparatus


Doesn’t encourage creativity and individualism


SPF and labelling

What are the two main aspects of comprehensive education

Catchment area and setting and stteaming

Catchment areas

Catchment areas designated area around a school. Students who live in it can attend the school. Certain people have priority:


Siblings


SEN


Parent works in the school


Pupil premium


Looked after children

Strengths of setting and streaming

Work can be tailored


Encourages competition


Promotes meritocracy


Different classes can sit different exams

Setting and streaming weaknesses

Ball- w/c more likely to be in bottom sets


Increases polarisation

Analysis of comprehensive system

Daily mail article/ leech and campos selection by mortgage, the richer u are u can move to a better area because of good schools


2014- PP becomes part of selection criteria

Analysis of comprehensive system

Daily mail article/ leech and campos selection by mortgage, the richer u are u can move to a better area because of good schools


2014- PP becomes part of selection criteria

Eval of comprehensive system

2014 admissions process changed PP got priority


2004 90% of failing schools were in deprived areas disadvantages working class children

What are all of the factors of marketisation?

Sponsors


League tables


LEA


Competition


Formula funding


Tuition fees


Free schools


OFSTED


Open enrolment


National curriculum

Why do NR favor marketisation study

CHUBB AND MOE


State schools in America are failing especially for disadvantaged students.


Parentocracy will raise standards in two ways:


Schools now have to compete for students as ‘clients’


Forces parents to engage with their child’s education

League tables A01

Welsh assembly publication of league tables and the average grade dropped by 2 grades at GCSE the. Replaced it with a traffic light system.




2022 Wales completed removed all league tables and traffic light system.


Replaced with school improvement framework gives school tools that encourage self improvement reflection

OFSTED eval

OFSTED reports and league tables may be in contrast this is bc OFSTED come for 1 or 2 days

Ofsted analysis

In 2021 69% of outstanding schools got down grades bc some hadn’t been inspected for 10 years

Study parentocracy

DAVID


Describes this phase as a parentocracy schools are now accountable to the parents

Eval of marketisation

BALL


Myth of parentocracy


He says NR ignore wider social structures eg wealth and ethnicity


Contradiction they want choice and diversity but also a national curriculum


Promotes ruling class ideology

Eval of BALL

Both free schools and academies opt out of the national curriculum

Myth of parentocracy study

GERWITZ


Studies class differences in parental choice of secondary schools:


There are privileged/ skills choosers: who are usually m/c and white w cultural capital


Semi-skilled choosers:


Choose based on reputation m/c Indian or Chinese


Local disadvantaged choosers:


Chooses the school closest to them

Define cream skimming

Schools picking the ‘best’ students that will look the best in league tables

Define slit shifting

Getting rid of low-attaining students

What is covert selection

TOUGH AND BROOKS


schools cherry pick students


School literature difficulties to understand website and application w/c parents have restricted code


School uniform is expensive problem for materially deprived


Only advertise the school in certain areas


Faith schools religious leaders act as references family backgrounds





Other forms of covert selection study

GREEN et al


Free schools were socially selecting pupils and Evel schools in the most deprived areas were failing to select underprivileged children

New labour policies

EAZ education action zones


National literacy challenge


City academies


EMA


Sure start


Specialist schools

Eval of new labour

BENN


NL policies are a contradiction. They try and help disadvantaged students with sure start and EMA but disadvantage the. With introduction of tuition fees

what was the aim of cons polices post 2010

competition, excellence, and innovation and to free schools from the 'dead hands of the state' privatisation


Ball and Exley: not only wanted to increase parental choice and marketisation but also but help disadvantaged pupils in line with marketisation

coalition education policies

academies


2017 68% of all schools were academies


2020 80% of schools are academies or free schools.


they wanted this to make schools accountable for their actions

eval of academies

BALL


academisation = fragmentation = privatisation which means private companies are now more involved in schools increases inequality




centralisation of control takes control away from LAs and gives control to gov




HALL sees academies as an example of handing over the public services to 'private capitalists' disagree with the fact that privatisation and competition drives standards and think that its a myth used to legitimise inequality



eval of academies pt2

machin and Vermoit- academies were more advantaged than other schools and took less FSM pupils

eval of machin et al

80% of schools are now free schools and academies


2014 the policy changed PP are higher up on admissions criteria