• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Moscovici et al 2008

How lay people uptake new social phenomena




Systematic study of "common sense" thinking




Widespread ensembles of thoughts and feelings akin to a 'lay theory"




Underpinned by socio-cultural, historic and group specific ideologies




Individual




Media and mind




Indicates outgroup in society

Moscovici 1961

Psychoanalysis in France




Catholics- confession, ignore sexualisation


Communists- USA, individualist, anti-communist




New ideas are shaped by existing ideas




Representations by communication

Jodelet

Madness and Social Representations




Mental patients living with families


Treated as contagious eg cutlery washed separately


"Soured"- anchoring to milk

ORIGIN

Scientific ideas (reified) filtered through the mass media (especially health risks)




Media and lay thinking are consensual




"Bottom up"

Chew and Eysenbach 2010

52.6% of H1N1 tweets were from traditional media

FORM

Anchoring: assimilated to known dangers eg. swine flu to either spanish or seasonal flu




Objectification: Symbols, metaphors and images held w/in group




Alarm or complacency

Joffe et al 2008, 2011

MRSA and the matron




Anchoring to matron despite antibiotic overuse being real issue

Nisbett and Ross

Strong initial views resistant to change

Harris 2013

Floods are biggest natural threat in the UK


But symbols of nature as benevolent, home as safe and society protecting its citizens




Blame humans instead of seeing it as an unavoidable act of nature

FUNCTION

1. Identity-protection- representation is protective (symbolic coping)




2. Status quo maintenance




3. Facilitate communication- frame of reference and shared common sense

Lupton's epistemological perspectives

Realist- "ill masked contempt for lay people"


'cultural conceptual categories mediate judgement'






Constructivist- "not objective or knowable outside of belief system"




Weak constructivist- SRT falls here


There is a material basis to a risk but the engagement is socially constructed




Content w/o reference to reality of risk

SRT STUDY DESIGN

Content based




Widespread group based representations (no deficit, no numerical data)




Interviews, media content analysis, free association, questionnaires




Quantitative- consensus


Qualitative- content

Fife-Shaw 1997

Criticisms of SRT




A) lack of clear, linear predictive theorising and falsification (Moscovici denies)




B) no different to other lay theories (has a structured study, is research based (biotech-1997), group and ideology based)

Moscovici 1988

SRT is fluid and constantly changing, no need for a specific definition

Silverman 1993

Methods need to be appropriate to subject matter- if it allows robust interpretation then it's acceptable and has power

Sarewitz 2010

Prediction is not always necessary in science

Joffe

Some factors influencing representation are not conscious and so cannot be measured through self report eg Jodelet and cutlery

Raudsepp

Westerners fundamentally struggle with dialectical epistemology and over focus on individuals

Duveen 2008

Plural rationalities (instead of deficit model)




Public accounts as a type of knowledge that should influence policies