• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/50

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

50 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

The theory states that a persons interpretation of a stimulus evokes the automatic changes quickly.

James lang theory

Simultaneously emotion and arousing stimulus

Cannon bard theory

To express emotion one must be physically aroused and cognitively label the arousal

Schaters two factor

A baseline established, adapt to both positive and negative circumstances.

Hedonic treadmill

Communication between individuals that relies on unspoken gestures

Nonverbal communication

6 universal facial expressions

Happy sad angry suprised scared disgust

The most universal facial expression

Happiness

Emotional intelligence


Facial expressions non verbal


Using emotions to facilitate thinking, creativity, and problem solving


Read a situation and respond correctly

Perception


Facilitating


Understanding

Lasting general evaluations of people objects and or issues

Attitudes

Tricomponent (ABC)


A


B


C

Affect (emotions)


Behavior( outward)


Cognition (thoughts and beliefs)

An attitude that is activated automatically from memory without the persons awareness that they posess it. (hidden)


Example: religious beliefs

Implicit attitude

A consciously held attitude. Feel comfortable discussing


Example: politics

Explicit attitude

Aware, under control, self-reports and controlled behavior, high cognitive resources, less resistant to change

Explicit

Unaware, outside control, influenced by subtle behavior outside our awareness, low cognitive resources, resistant to change

Implicit

The simultaneous possession of contradictory implicit and explicit attitudes toward the same object (working in opposite directions)

Dual attitudes

The process through which people acquire new information forms of behavior or attitudes from other persons

Social learning

Learning through association when a neutral (c) stimulus paired with a + or -(uc) stimulus that naturally produces a (uc/c) automatic response. (commercials)

Classical conditioning

A type of learning in which behavior is strengthened if followed by reinforcement and weakened if followed by punishment ( reinforcement& punishment)

Operant conditioning

Forming attitudes by watching others

Observational learning

Compare ourselves to others in order to determine if our attitudes are correct.

Social comparison

Knowledge function, identity function, self-eesteem, ego

Attitude functions

Can lead to a positive attitude. The more your exposed to something, the more you like it. Repeated exposures to a neutral object will often lead to the development of positive attitude towards that object.

Mere exposure

Asserts that rationalization of shapes, certain attitudes . a feeling of discomfort cussed by performing an action

Cognitive dissonance

Change your attitude, change your perception, minimize the importance of conflict, minimize the importance of conflict, reduce the perceived conflict

Reducing dissonance

Level of specificity, time factors, private vs public awareness, attitude accessibility, attitude strength

Attitude- behavior relationship

Asserts that attitudes influence behavior by shaping intentions.

Theory of planned behavior

Efforts by one or more individuals to change the attitudes beliefs and values of others.

Social influence

Most strict


Asking


Change based on what other people are doing


Doing complete opposite, independence, assertiveness

Obedience


Compliance


Conformity


Defiant


Change attitude or behavior in order to adhere to existing social norms.

Conformity

Rules indicating how individuals are expected to behave in specific situations ( not written unspoken rules that guide our behavior)

Social norms

Publicly acting in accord with a direct request. ( social pressure more likely to give when judgement can occur)

Compliance

Both acting and believing in accord with a request.

Private

Acting in accord with a direct request despite privately disagreeing with it.

Public

Factors of compliance


Liking/,asking a friend to help out


Say yes\ future yes


Donation


Limited time


Social influence


Social pressure


Information

Friendship


Commitment/ consistency


Reciprocity


Scarcity


Social validation


Authority


Giving reasons

Set up for real request by first getting a person to comply with a much smaller request

Foot In The Door

A large request follwed by a smaller request

Door In The Face

Direct request for assistance

Direct Order

Secure agreement with a request but then increase size of request by revealing hidden cost.

Low Balling

Influencer begins with a large request then decreases size by offering discount or bonus

Thats not all technique

Efforts to change others attitudes through the use of various kinds of messages.


Persuasion

Straight down the middle, strength and quality, high elaboration, enduring, predictive of behavior

Central

Quick decisions, superficial cues, length of message, attractiveness, expert source, low elaboration, less predictive of behavior

Peripheral cues

Credible, component, trustworthy, similarity, likability

Source

Increase in pervasiveness of low credibility source over time

The sleeper effect

Vidividess, fear, humor, one sided, two sided, repetition

Message

Your side, you convince others to adopt your perspective by representing only your opinion

One sided

Message that involves you acknowledging the opposing arguments in your pitch

Two sided

Knowing someone is going to persuade us and defend the message

Inoculation hypothesis

The theory that the amount of social influence others have depends on their number of strengths and immediacy to those they are trying to influence

Social impact theory

Leads to cognitive dissonance no other excuse

Insufficient justification