• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/71

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

71 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
attitudes
favorable or unfavorable EVALUATIVE REACTIONS to people, events, ideas
ex: likes and dislikes
development of attitudes
learn, behavioral justification, and desire for
cognitive component of attitudes
beliefs develop which JUSTIFY the attitude
ex: reasons why Old School is my favorite movie
behavioral component of attitudes
how much the attitude actually affects behavior
attitudes are assumed to...
assumed to be a major determinant of behavior, BUT attitudes only explain 10 PERCENT of variance in behavior
theory of planed behavior
AKA theory of reasoned action;
attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control all lead to BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS which lead to behavior
why only 10%?
subjective norms
will important peers approve of the behavior? are you going with or against the grain?
attitude strength determinants
commitment (certainty of attitude), embededness (how important the issue is to you)
ex: personal relevance; increased self consciousness; when people are made aware of their attitude
behavioral justification
attitudes developed to justify and explain our behavior
ex: behavior causes the attitude
perceived behavioral control
thought of how difficult or easy it would be to control a behavior
ie smokers saying "i'm not addicted, i can quit any time and not crave it"
behavioral intentions
your desire to act in a certain way; these actually AFFECT your actual behavior
attitude strength determined by...
commitment and embeddedness;
commitment
certainty of the attitude; how certain that this is the appropriate, correct attitude?
embededness
how important the issue is to you; they becomre embedded in your self concept
determinants of embededness
knowledge of issue (more you know, more you care); personal relevance of issue; accessibility (in memory) of the attitude; when people reminded of their attitude, it becomes stronger to them
behavioral justification
attitudes can develop as a way to justify/explain our own behavior; ie behavior causes the attitude
role playing
(behavioral justification); acting leads to believing;
ie on screen lovers often become lovers in real life; stanford prison experiment
foot-in-the-door technique
(behavioral justification); way or manipulating people to agree to a large request
1st get them to agree to small request
2nd gradually increase size of request
ie the big ugly 'drive safely' sign example
consistency principle
people want to have thoughts, feelings, and behaviors be consistent with EACH OTHER; we want our behavior to match our beliefs
balance theory
we want to agree with people we like and disagree with people we dont like;
multiplying variances (balance theory)
subject + side of issue
subject + friend
friend - side of issue
= negative
negative value means something needs to change
cognitive dissonance theory
perceived inconsistency between attitudes and behaviors causes dissonance (unpleasant state of psychological tension)
when can dissonance lead to attitude change?
insufficient justification, postdecisional dissonance, unpleasant initiation
insufficient justification
when had free choice when performing the counter-attitudinal behavior
unpleasant initiation
when people behave in ways that go against deeply-held beliefs
ie being told to do something against ones beliefs
post decisional dissonance
when making a decision between 2 items wanted the dissonance is between the item actually chosen and the things liked about the item not chosen
persuasion
deliberately changing an attitude or belief as a result of receiving a persuasive message; based on assumption that changing an attitude will change behavior
ie advertising; education
models of persuasion
message learning model, cognitive response models
message learning model
persuasion is a rational process based on learning
a persuasive message must be (in order):
noticed (attention to message)
comprehended
remembered (acceptance of message)
cognitive response models
self talk, elaboration likelihood model
self talk
(cognitive response model) persuasion depends on how a person thinks about a message
counterarguments
(self talk) developing your own argument against the issue; decrease persuasion
inoculation theory
(self talk) preventing persuasion by giving people weak, easily defeated arguments in favor of the opposition; giving audience more time to think about topic will give them more time to think why its a bad idea
ie bring up opposing side's counter argument and make it seem minor
elaboration likelihood model
(cognitive response model) most dominant form of persuasion; dual process model: central route and peripheral route
central route
involves logical and rational analysis of arguments; leads to strong attitudes
peripheral route
persuasion comes from how message is presented, not its content; HEURISTICS based
aspects of the communicator (peripheral route)
credibility, trustworthiness, expertise, attractiveness
when is elaboration necessary? (best for central route)
personal relevance - important issues require CENTRAL route
people who have a need for cognition - these people not affected by peripheral
ability to understand message - no distraction/time limits
prejudice
an UNJUSTIFIABLE NEGATIVE ATTITUDE toward people based on their group membership; beliefs develop to justify the prejudice - stereotypes
discrimination
TREATING people differently based on their group membership
basis of prejudice
usually associated with racism and sexism; anything can be basis of prejudice; ie estimators example - divide group ppl will favor ppl on their side of group;
strongest prejudices
against: ppl with mental illness; college students;
cognitive basis of prejudice
can develop as a by-product of normal cognitive processes (anyone can develop prejudices. it's inevitable)
social categorization
where social cognition starts; leads to distinguish between 'my group' and 'other groups'
social categorization leads to...
in group bias
basis of prejudice
usually associated with racism and sexism; anything can be basis of prejudice; ie estimators example - divide group ppl will favor ppl on their side of group;
strongest prejudices
against: ppl with mental illness; college students;
cognitive basis of prejudice
can develop as a by-product of normal cognitive processes (anyone can develop prejudices. it's inevitable)
social categorization
where social cognition starts; leads to distinguish between 'my group' and 'other groups'
social categorization leads to...
in group bias
in group bias leads to...
group serving bias
group serving bias
we favor in-group members; beliefs develop to justify the attitude
negative stereotypes
out groups assumed to have negative characteristics
ie illegals all lazy
symbolic threats
threats to beliefs and values; out group presents threat to our basic social beliefs and values;
ie US belief that muslims are trying to destroy our society
attributions
explanations for behavior; why people act that way
ie lower class are there because they dont work hard
fundamental attribution error
our tendency to over value other's behavior being caused by their personality and who they are
emotional bias of prejudice
scapegoat theory, intergroup anxiety, attacks to self-esteem
scapegoat theory
blaming out-groups for problems
ie lynching rate grew when price of cotton grew low
intergroup anxiety
fear of interaction; not knowing how to interact with another - anxiety interpreted as hatred
attacks to self-esteem
having self esteem lowered then furthers the gap of hatred of the other party; downward comparison
ie U of A essay sucks, then wrote essay saying u of a is way worse than asu, much better paper
behavioral basis of prejudice
realistic group conflict theory
realistic group conflict theory
just competing with others can lead to prejudice; especially when competing for scarce resources
ie lack of jobs make us point our fingers at 'illegals'
maintaining prejudices
confirmation bias, behavioral confirmation
confirmation bias
accept info that supports beliefs, but reject if goes against beliefs; personal experiences are looked at as 'this person is the one exception to the rule'
behavioral confirmation
prejudice can become self-fulfilling prophecy; we act in ways that make our expectations come true
psychological costs of prejudice
increased self consciousness, stereotype threat
increased self consciousness
being the minority can have negative effect on performance
stereotype threat
fear of confirming a negative stereotype
ie if a girl is aware of the stereotype that girls are bad at math, the anxiety of proving that right will make her perform badly
stereotype threat
example of black and white students taking test, some told to write their race down before the test, other group didn't; ones that wrote race whites did a lot better; ones that didn't, black kids scored higher than white kids
sherrifs robbers study
kids went to camp split in 2 groups didn't know each other existed; each group told to go 2 field; they saw eachother and played a game of baseball; each group ended up hating the other group
can prejudice be eliminated?
through cultural norms; might just keep prejudices from being expressed