Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
71 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
attitudes
|
favorable or unfavorable EVALUATIVE REACTIONS to people, events, ideas
ex: likes and dislikes |
|
|
development of attitudes
|
learn, behavioral justification, and desire for
|
|
|
cognitive component of attitudes
|
beliefs develop which JUSTIFY the attitude
ex: reasons why Old School is my favorite movie |
|
|
behavioral component of attitudes
|
how much the attitude actually affects behavior
|
|
|
attitudes are assumed to...
|
assumed to be a major determinant of behavior, BUT attitudes only explain 10 PERCENT of variance in behavior
|
|
|
theory of planed behavior
|
AKA theory of reasoned action;
attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control all lead to BEHAVIORAL INTENTIONS which lead to behavior |
why only 10%?
|
|
subjective norms
|
will important peers approve of the behavior? are you going with or against the grain?
|
|
|
attitude strength determinants
|
commitment (certainty of attitude), embededness (how important the issue is to you)
ex: personal relevance; increased self consciousness; when people are made aware of their attitude |
|
|
behavioral justification
|
attitudes developed to justify and explain our behavior
ex: behavior causes the attitude |
|
|
perceived behavioral control
|
thought of how difficult or easy it would be to control a behavior
ie smokers saying "i'm not addicted, i can quit any time and not crave it" |
|
|
behavioral intentions
|
your desire to act in a certain way; these actually AFFECT your actual behavior
|
|
|
attitude strength determined by...
|
commitment and embeddedness;
|
|
|
commitment
|
certainty of the attitude; how certain that this is the appropriate, correct attitude?
|
|
|
embededness
|
how important the issue is to you; they becomre embedded in your self concept
|
|
|
determinants of embededness
|
knowledge of issue (more you know, more you care); personal relevance of issue; accessibility (in memory) of the attitude; when people reminded of their attitude, it becomes stronger to them
|
|
|
behavioral justification
|
attitudes can develop as a way to justify/explain our own behavior; ie behavior causes the attitude
|
|
|
role playing
|
(behavioral justification); acting leads to believing;
ie on screen lovers often become lovers in real life; stanford prison experiment |
|
|
foot-in-the-door technique
|
(behavioral justification); way or manipulating people to agree to a large request
1st get them to agree to small request 2nd gradually increase size of request ie the big ugly 'drive safely' sign example |
|
|
consistency principle
|
people want to have thoughts, feelings, and behaviors be consistent with EACH OTHER; we want our behavior to match our beliefs
|
|
|
balance theory
|
we want to agree with people we like and disagree with people we dont like;
|
|
|
multiplying variances (balance theory)
|
subject + side of issue
subject + friend friend - side of issue = negative negative value means something needs to change |
|
|
cognitive dissonance theory
|
perceived inconsistency between attitudes and behaviors causes dissonance (unpleasant state of psychological tension)
|
|
|
when can dissonance lead to attitude change?
|
insufficient justification, postdecisional dissonance, unpleasant initiation
|
|
|
insufficient justification
|
when had free choice when performing the counter-attitudinal behavior
|
|
|
unpleasant initiation
|
when people behave in ways that go against deeply-held beliefs
ie being told to do something against ones beliefs |
|
|
post decisional dissonance
|
when making a decision between 2 items wanted the dissonance is between the item actually chosen and the things liked about the item not chosen
|
|
|
persuasion
|
deliberately changing an attitude or belief as a result of receiving a persuasive message; based on assumption that changing an attitude will change behavior
ie advertising; education |
|
|
models of persuasion
|
message learning model, cognitive response models
|
|
|
message learning model
|
persuasion is a rational process based on learning
a persuasive message must be (in order): noticed (attention to message) comprehended remembered (acceptance of message) |
|
|
cognitive response models
|
self talk, elaboration likelihood model
|
|
|
self talk
|
(cognitive response model) persuasion depends on how a person thinks about a message
|
|
|
counterarguments
|
(self talk) developing your own argument against the issue; decrease persuasion
|
|
|
inoculation theory
|
(self talk) preventing persuasion by giving people weak, easily defeated arguments in favor of the opposition; giving audience more time to think about topic will give them more time to think why its a bad idea
ie bring up opposing side's counter argument and make it seem minor |
|
|
elaboration likelihood model
|
(cognitive response model) most dominant form of persuasion; dual process model: central route and peripheral route
|
|
|
central route
|
involves logical and rational analysis of arguments; leads to strong attitudes
|
|
|
peripheral route
|
persuasion comes from how message is presented, not its content; HEURISTICS based
|
|
|
aspects of the communicator (peripheral route)
|
credibility, trustworthiness, expertise, attractiveness
|
|
|
when is elaboration necessary? (best for central route)
|
personal relevance - important issues require CENTRAL route
people who have a need for cognition - these people not affected by peripheral ability to understand message - no distraction/time limits |
|
|
prejudice
|
an UNJUSTIFIABLE NEGATIVE ATTITUDE toward people based on their group membership; beliefs develop to justify the prejudice - stereotypes
|
|
|
discrimination
|
TREATING people differently based on their group membership
|
|
|
basis of prejudice
|
usually associated with racism and sexism; anything can be basis of prejudice; ie estimators example - divide group ppl will favor ppl on their side of group;
|
|
|
strongest prejudices
|
against: ppl with mental illness; college students;
|
|
|
cognitive basis of prejudice
|
can develop as a by-product of normal cognitive processes (anyone can develop prejudices. it's inevitable)
|
|
|
social categorization
|
where social cognition starts; leads to distinguish between 'my group' and 'other groups'
|
|
|
social categorization leads to...
|
in group bias
|
|
|
basis of prejudice
|
usually associated with racism and sexism; anything can be basis of prejudice; ie estimators example - divide group ppl will favor ppl on their side of group;
|
|
|
strongest prejudices
|
against: ppl with mental illness; college students;
|
|
|
cognitive basis of prejudice
|
can develop as a by-product of normal cognitive processes (anyone can develop prejudices. it's inevitable)
|
|
|
social categorization
|
where social cognition starts; leads to distinguish between 'my group' and 'other groups'
|
|
|
social categorization leads to...
|
in group bias
|
|
|
in group bias leads to...
|
group serving bias
|
|
|
group serving bias
|
we favor in-group members; beliefs develop to justify the attitude
|
|
|
negative stereotypes
|
out groups assumed to have negative characteristics
ie illegals all lazy |
|
|
symbolic threats
|
threats to beliefs and values; out group presents threat to our basic social beliefs and values;
ie US belief that muslims are trying to destroy our society |
|
|
attributions
|
explanations for behavior; why people act that way
ie lower class are there because they dont work hard |
|
|
fundamental attribution error
|
our tendency to over value other's behavior being caused by their personality and who they are
|
|
|
emotional bias of prejudice
|
scapegoat theory, intergroup anxiety, attacks to self-esteem
|
|
|
scapegoat theory
|
blaming out-groups for problems
ie lynching rate grew when price of cotton grew low |
|
|
intergroup anxiety
|
fear of interaction; not knowing how to interact with another - anxiety interpreted as hatred
|
|
|
attacks to self-esteem
|
having self esteem lowered then furthers the gap of hatred of the other party; downward comparison
ie U of A essay sucks, then wrote essay saying u of a is way worse than asu, much better paper |
|
|
behavioral basis of prejudice
|
realistic group conflict theory
|
|
|
realistic group conflict theory
|
just competing with others can lead to prejudice; especially when competing for scarce resources
ie lack of jobs make us point our fingers at 'illegals' |
|
|
maintaining prejudices
|
confirmation bias, behavioral confirmation
|
|
|
confirmation bias
|
accept info that supports beliefs, but reject if goes against beliefs; personal experiences are looked at as 'this person is the one exception to the rule'
|
|
|
behavioral confirmation
|
prejudice can become self-fulfilling prophecy; we act in ways that make our expectations come true
|
|
|
psychological costs of prejudice
|
increased self consciousness, stereotype threat
|
|
|
increased self consciousness
|
being the minority can have negative effect on performance
|
|
|
stereotype threat
|
fear of confirming a negative stereotype
ie if a girl is aware of the stereotype that girls are bad at math, the anxiety of proving that right will make her perform badly |
|
|
stereotype threat
|
example of black and white students taking test, some told to write their race down before the test, other group didn't; ones that wrote race whites did a lot better; ones that didn't, black kids scored higher than white kids
|
|
|
sherrifs robbers study
|
kids went to camp split in 2 groups didn't know each other existed; each group told to go 2 field; they saw eachother and played a game of baseball; each group ended up hating the other group
|
|
|
can prejudice be eliminated?
|
through cultural norms; might just keep prejudices from being expressed
|
|