• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/90

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

90 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Social Psychology
scientific study of how individuals THINK, FEEL, and BEHAVE in their PERCEIVED social context
Interactionist Perspective
we are interested in how individuals interact rather than macro-level forces
Social Perception
look, interpret, judge, and predict our social world
Inferences
Social Position and Individual Differences
Social Position
where in hierarchy...gender, age, race, religion, social class
Raw Data of social perception
people, situations, and behavior
Social perception of...
person perception
group perception - stereotypes
situation - scripts
objects - attitudes
you - self perception
Types of cues
Behavioral
Verbal
Non-verbal
Scripts
schemas for social events
Stereotype
schema for groups
Attitudes
schemas for objects
Where do cues come from?
biological (babies)
learned (change over time)
Levine's Formula
B= f(P,E)
Correspondent Inference Theory
people try to infer from an action whether the act itself corresponds to an enduring personal characteristic of the actor; is the cue part of the person or part of the person's conformity?
What type of behavior forms cues?
verbal
physical
nonverbal
non-verbal behavior
appearance
face
body
voice
Is perception from cues accurate?
fairly accurate, some are better than others
Implicit Personality Theory
all inferences are connected in huge network in our head; a network of assumptions people makes about traits and behaviors
Schema
cognitive frameworks
- organized - expert
- disorganized - doesn't know
You can use schemas for...
objects, yourself, situations, and groups
Prototype
visual image; allows instant recognition
Situation schemas
follow appropriate script
(time element, unlike in other schemas)
Advantages of schemas
quick, help us remember, variety, allow us to interact
Disadvantages of schemas
only see schema,label
interpret everything, deceptive, favorite schemas,priming
Priming
if you have a schema used recently you're more likely to use it next time you hit something
Judgment
schema with positive or negative values
Weighted average model
some traits are weighted more than others, all are averaged together
Primacy
original information is always weighted more than later information
Info we gather____ is better than info we gather _____.
ourselves, from others
Which is more significant when judging - positive or negative data?
negative
Stereotypes
group schema (+,-, neutral)
Units of stereotypes
how we stereotype;
proximity, similarity, homogeneity, implied contrast
Proximity
spatial grouping
Similarity
similar traits
Homogeneity
ignore minor variations
Implied contrast
if one group exists other different group must exist
Illusory correlation
a tendency for people to overestimate the link between variables that are slightly or not at all correlated; happened once but so distinct we wash out actual data
Problems with stereotyping
mislabeling
incorrect schema
Mislabeling
prototype
representative fallacy
Bogus pipeline
fake lie detector
Implicit Association Test
asks questions to see your stereotypes; studies reaction time for mismatches
Cognitive overload
so many objects in your head- tend to stereotype more
Self schemas
you have to be self aware, develop over time
Characteristics of self schemas
self perception
reflected appraisal
Self perception
"you know who you are by watching yourself"
Reflected appraisal
"you know who you are because people have told you"
MUM effect
as you get older people are less likely to tel you what you're doing wrong - you lose feedback
Issue of distinctiveness
people are more likely to respond to characteristics that are unique; that is what is perceived back
Self reference effect
things that are relevant to the self and more likely to be remembered and remembered correctly
False consensus effect
under uncertainty assume it is the same as your schema
Self organization
material
social
personality
Material
body and possessions
Social
interpersonal self
collective social self
social roles
Personality
general tendencies in behavior that I see over long period of time and many social situations
Social Roles
positions you play - ex. mother, friend
Role conflict
overlap of roles; expectations in the roles don't match
Self esteem
judgment of self; have a standard and compare ourself to it
Ideal self
positive - who you'd like to be
negative - who you'd not like to be
Self Consciousness Scale
internal and external self esteem; public vs. private self conscious
Private self conscious
introspective
Public self consciousness
care more about what other people think about you/what they see
Rosenburg self esteem scale
way to measure self esteem; measures global self esteem
Things that make you self conscious:
video camera, mirror, public speaking, interview, date....more self awareness
Self fulfilling prophecy
1. Perceiver's expectations
2. Perceiver's behavior towards target
3. Target's behavior
Internal standard
actual
External standard
sociometer
passive
active
Sociometer
what I think others think
Passive
comparison of myself vs. others
Active
compare myself to similar people
Motivation
affects self esteem
1. self enhancement
2. self verification
3. terror management
Self enhancement
You want to think good things about yourself; you will manipulate yourself to feel good about yourself
Self verification
We want people to see us as you think you are
Terror management theory
avoidance of death; preservation of life;
Basking in reflected glory
use other people's successes to make themselves feel better
(ex. sports team wins wear logos)
Self-esteem maintenance theory
be careful with finding people too close to you it could become a social comparison
Adjust standard
I can pick it so it makes me look good
(ex. obese people don't compare themselves to supermodels)
Downward social comparison
select a group doing worse than you so you can feel better
(ex. breast cancer survivors - compare to those who have suffered more)
Upward social comparison
select group doing better than you; makes you feel worse but helps you improve
Effect of the self concept on behavior
cybermetic/thermostatal/tote model
Rumination
can't hit standard, can't exit--think about process, schema becomes more elaborate, worse you feel.
Ways to quit rumination/Get out of tote process
distraction
compensate
self presentation
self monitoring
Self monitor
watch people outside and use them as standard
High self monitor
want to make other people happy; unstable presentation
Stereotype threat
negative stereotype impact;
people live up to stereotype;
Choking
too self aware, can't perform
Attribution
the study of "why?"
Fundamental Attribution Error
the tendency to go with internal attribution for other people
Reasons for FAE
perceptual
informational
motivational
cultural
Hedonic relevance
the more I'm impacted by the results the more likely I am to go internal
Self Attribution
FAE doesnt work; can't see ourselves
-perceptual
-informational
-motivational