Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
36 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
why use conceptual frameworks?
|
1. to better understand causal mechanisms behind public health problems
2. to better target toward interventions |
|
2 types of intervention targets
|
1. biological (proximate) determinants
2. sociobehavioral (distal) determinants -individual level - family level -community level |
|
levels of distal determinants and examples of each
|
Individual: culture, education
Household: wealth, resources Community: political system, infrastructure |
|
types of proximate determinants
(Mosley/Chen article) |
Maternal factors
Environmental contamination Nutritional deficiency Injury Personal illness control |
|
general conceptual framework
|
Social influences --> behavior --> biological/proximate determinants --> health outcome
|
|
structure
|
something arranged in a definite pattern of organization; constraints on one's ability to make choices; "endowment"
|
|
agency
|
the extent to which one can make real choices; what you do with your "endowment"
|
|
the difference between structure and agency?
|
structure is what you're given to work with, and agency is how you use it
|
|
determinants in the health belief model
|
perceived susceptibility/severity/benefits/barriers/self-efficacy
|
|
stages in the "stages of change" model
|
1. precontemplation
2. contemplation 3. initiation of change 4. maintenance |
|
theory of reasoned action
|
theory of planned behavior; acknowledges individual decision-making
|
|
components to theory of reasoned action
|
1. attitude (agency)
-what you believe will result from a course of action -evaluation of the outcome (good/bad) 2. norm (structure) -perception of what the norm is -how important it is to comply with the norm also includes self-efficacy: measure of perceived behavioral control |
|
mediating/intervening variable
|
thing through which the independent variable affects the outcome
|
|
moderating/interacting variable
|
the degree to which the outcome will happen (i.e. environment, accomplices)
|
|
reliability
|
the extent to which your results can be replicated
|
|
internal validity
|
the extent to which study results are due to the independent variables, rather than design flaws
|
|
sociology OF medicine
|
a critical perspective of health care (i.e., what's wrong with it)
|
|
sociology IN medicine
|
applied theory;
involves collaboration between social scientists and biomedical researchers, with the ultimate goal of wanting to act upon findings, rather than just sitting there mulling it over |
|
the new modern view of medical sociology
|
-health care as a major social institution; conservative
-determinants/consequences of health status -health = well-being |
|
differences between biomedical and social scientific approaches to research
|
SS...
-is iterative -emphasizes formative research -mixes qualitative and quantitative approaches |
|
statistical modeling and data analysis involves...
|
-multilevel analysis
-multivariate analysis -causal analysis |
|
measurement in SS health research...
|
-censored data
-latent variables -operationalization of abstract variables |
|
methods used by social scientists in health research
|
1. statistical modeling
2. measurement 3. sampling 4. qualitative analysis |
|
"upstream" ways to address health inequalities
|
target social/economic arrangements
|
|
"downstream' ways to address health inequalities
|
target health delivery systems and health behavior
|
|
pareto criterion
|
a policy that harms no one while making at least a few people better off is a good thing
|
|
things that health policy could target
|
-the poor
-specific diseases or groups -the gradient itself -directing policy at BOTH health and wealth |
|
diffusion
|
the planned or spontaneous spread of new ideas; a communicative process
|
|
innovation
|
an idea, practice, or object that is perceived as "new"
|
|
diffusion of innovation
|
an innovation that is communicated through certain channels over time among individuals in a social system
|
|
innovators
|
-venturesome
-able to cope with uncertainty -far ahead of the average individual |
|
early adopters
|
-more integrated in social system
-looked upon for advice, information -are examples of discrete, successful uses of new ideas |
|
early majority
|
followers who deliberate before they adopt; seldom lead
|
|
late majority
|
-skeptical, cautious; do not take up anything new until most of the population has
-peer pressure is necessary |
|
late adopter
|
-usually isolated from social system
-only decide to adopt what has been done in the past |
|
opinion leaders
|
influence others' opinions either informally or via interpersonal communication
-determine rates of adoption of an innovation |