• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Parental socialization of gender
from parents to infants: girls closer more affectionate relational from parents, which supports a movement into gender typed behavior

from parents to childhood: reinforce gender type play, discourage cross gender play, encourage boys physicality and individualism, more limiting towards girls, more praising of boys

ethnicity: european more encouraging than hispanic, african american more encouraging than european

all stronger when parents hold more stereotyped beliefs

punishment: more punitive of boys
gender stereotyped parents cause their kids to hold these stereotypes a lot stronger STUDY

(Importance of parent's gender typed beliefs)
gender stereotyped parents cause their kids to hold these stereotypes a lot stronger

"these problems are hard, vs. try your best"

5-7 yea old girls: math performance suffered when they were reminded of stereotype

when mothers don't hold stereotype beliefs and don't tell them what they can and can't do, they seem to hold less influences from external influences about what they can and can't do.
Are we getting past gender?
Androgyny and changing activities

masculinity and femininity as 2 dimensions

high in femininity low in maculinity = feminine

low in feminine, low in masculine = undifferentiated

high feminine, high in masculine = androgyny

1970:s 30% college students endorse adrogyny

1990s: 45% of college women endorsed androgynous characteristics, women compraised 50% of high power high achieving fields.
Oswald bem sex role validity (and study)
college students perceive bsri items very differently

men and women converge over lifespan in masculinity and femininity in women

women describe themselves as less feminine with age, men describe themselves as more feminine with age

(decrease stronger for women without mental health)

Alpha: extraverted and traditional/socially conservative show no increase in femininity

Delta: intraverted, socially progressive and non normative showed an increase in femininity
Advantages of androgyny
Being scored high in androgyny:

adults have flexible thinking, and are adaptable to varying situations

children have greater self esteem and being likeable

only true if androgyny stems from positive traits
egan and perry: judgements about gender identity
feel typical, content, and feel free to explore options of gender, seem to do best when it comes to positive adaptive outcomes
siblings
80% of children have at least one sibling

most spend more time with siblings than anyone else
Research on siblings
first born children - adult oriented, helpful, self controlled (helpful, cooperative, self controlled, less likely to engage in risk taking behavior)

later-born - less fearful and anxious and have more self confidence and social poise than their first born siblings

only children - high achievers, personal control, maturity, and leadership

introducing a second child completely changes lifestyle of the first child

Not a strong find
meta analysis
older brother predicts more traditional masculinity in younger siblings

having an older sister is unrelated to femininity
Birth order and sibling interactions
older siblings often act as caregivers, and teachers

older siblings can serve as resources for their younger siblings in times of stress

but older siblings not always positive
associations between friendship and sibling quality
low friendship and low sibling quality report aggressive disruptive behavior

sibling conflict predicts increases in aggressive behavior, but sibling aggression does not

how are the kids reacting vs. the behavior
sibling relationship over time
sibling relationships change as they grow older:

when they reach adolescents they become much more alike (less competitive about trying to get parents to attend to them)

allows intimacy to increase
quality of sibling relationship
affects mental and physical health, social functioning, and general well being

evidence across lifespan indicates importance of sibling relationship; source of support during times of stress

siblings are important at an early age: when second child arrives, everything changes for first born child: antagonism, play, socialization, teaching, etc.
Middle childhood
Middle childhood:
relationships become more egalitarian: decrease in dominance by older, increase in power by younger (as a result intensity and frequency of conflict goes up)

evidence for continuity, also for change
increase in closeness and conflict
little change in affection, but decline in companionship
Adolescence
sibling influences on acquisition of competent and problem behaviors
- academic achievement and social support
- delinquent and alcohol use

relationships vary: hostility and warmth:

ambivalent: not a lot of conflict not a lot of warmth

enmeshed: very high in warmth and hostility
what effects do siblings have on development? (study)
do siblings shape identity development?

identity exploration vs commitment

exploration: how far have they looked and found themselves

commitment: how committed are they to their choices

older/earlier born

younger/later born

same sex/opposite sex

(differentiating age from order born)

sibling identification vs. differentiation

more mature identity formation linked to:

birth order: being early born

birth proximity: having sibling close in age

gender parenting: have same sex sibling

Why?

earlier born: likely to focus on parents as who to imitate

closeness relationship quality is higher for same sex sibling ppairs (they play similarly)

this does not show identity or differentiation
siblings have a limited role in shaping identity commitment (study)
all variables are significant with each other

individual continuity over time: those further in exploration and commitment tend to stay that way

where does commitment of one sibling predict commitment of a later sibling?

later born youths with a same sex sibling had deeper commitment to school or work identity in wave 2 to 3, if you're sibling did too

little evidence for youths developing identity commitment being influenced by their siblings earlier levels of identity
Same study for model of exploration
identity exploration significantly predicted identity exploration for all youths except earlier born siblings with same sex siblings (wave 1 to 2)

the extent to which your younger sibling is engaged in exploration doesn't shape your own

older born siblings don't emulate younger siblings

later born youths with a same sex sibling had deeper exploration of school or work identity (wave 2 to 3)
All associations of previous studies predict identification
younger/later born siblings identity development more subject to influence than older/later born siblings, especially if same sex.

power, status: role models to be imitated
do most of us become like our older brothers and sisters (are siblings not interested in differentiated themselves?)
identification stronger with increasing difference.

middle child syndrome.

content of identity exploration and commitment

closer to age the more similar, farther in age the less similar