• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/5

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

5 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Robinson's Theses

It's very, very bad.


"There is no good and evil, there is only power"


Radical/Marxist case


Claims: 1. globalization has been here for a while - we used to call it colonialism. It didn't work well back then either


2. Today's globalization gives zero-sum outcomes (some benefit a lot and some benefit not at all) to a few and not much else for others (leads to redivision of labor and de facto population - de facto disregards law and accepts society for all practical purposes)


3. Warfare and species crisis are the results


Robinson is a hyperglobalist - but the news is all bad instead of all good


Lechner's 3 Waves of Globalization

First wave (1400s-1600s): Europe was armed, America wasn't.


Lots of disease


Trading of: slaves, bulk goods, tobacco, sugar


Ex: Jamaica - sugar production; became economically sound once slave trade was introduced


Second wave (1850s-1914): People view themselves as members of an international world


Industry, cash crops, migration


Change is happening fast


Countries are getting richer and richer


Industrialization begins, communication is easier (phone), and workforce grows


Ex: North Dakota - built railroad, and settlers followed. This new transportation led to booming wheat fields by the tracks in ND


Third wave (1945-?): Where we are now


Diffusion of multiple tastes around the world


Interdependence of diff. groups of people


Organization across global lines


Culture and consciousness that binds people


New institutions, food, technology


Ex: McDonald's in East Asia - once introduced, started popping up everywhere


Very popular - the "cool American place"


Barber's Claims

"Schizophrenic" view of globalization


After Cold War people shift away from state-centric mode of analysis


They adopt "systems theory" (names the ways in which global systems cut across borders and shape political outcomes)


Barber has 3 points:


1. The world is split by two forces - tribalism and globalization (Jihad vs. McWorld)


2. These tendencies have been going on for a while, but more so since the Cold War


3. These tendencies are opposed and impossible to be compatible with each other


Huntington's Arguments

Huntington suggests civilizational conflicts will dominate the future


Arguments: People define themselves with ethnicity/religion and it becomes "Us vs. Them" with people of different ethnicities/religions


All of this builds of existing patterns of conflict


Power, influence, and control are zero-sum games (what one side gets, the other loses)


1. Diff. among civilizations are basic (language, etc.)


2. The world is getting smaller (more interaction)


3. Modernization and social change are separating people from local identity


4. Growth of civilization consciousness is enhanced by the West (peak of power)


5. Cultural diff. are less mutable - not as easily resolved


6. Economic regionalism (trade) is increasing

Micklethwait and Woolridge

4 freedoms: speech, worship, from want, and from fear


Believes: "It's all good"


This is hyperglobalism - the belief that globalization changes everything


This world has more freedom than it used to