• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/34

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

34 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Kinsey survey (1940s) - research involved

survey based research using questionnaires


10,000 responders

Kinsey survey (1940s) found



high prevalence of masturbation


oral sex more prevalent in college educated people


10% of the population prefer homosexual sex

Masters and Johnson (1960s) research involved

observing and measuring human sexual activity in the laboratory

Masters and Johnson (1960s) research conclusions

Four stage model of human sexual response:


Excitement - arousal increasing


Plateau - fully asoused


Orgasm - brief pleasurable sensation


Resolution - muscles relax, blood pressure drops

Schultz et al. (1999) research involved

MRI of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal


8 couples participated

Siveter (2003) discovered a 425 million year old fossilized creature with a penis. This supports the longevity of

reproduction via 2 sexes

HOWEVER - are males necessary? Clear sex differentiation isn't universal

Slugs & snails are simultaneous hermaphrodites - male and female sexual organs


Clown fish are sequential hermaphrodites - they switch sexes depending on environmental conditions

HOWEVER - are males necessary? Clear sex differentiation isn't universal

Some animals reproduce sexually or by parthenogenesis - e.g. aphids - explained by swapping genes leading to passing on beneficial mutations to produce hardier offspring


Parthenogenesis passes on mutations much slower than S

In sexual reproducers there are 4 basic mating systems

Promiscuity


Polygyny


Polyandry


Monogamy

Promiscuity

animals mate with several partners and do not establish long lasting parnerships. this usually means a few males mating a lot and vice versa; most mammals

Polygyny

one male mates with a group of females but each female only has male partner e.g. elephant seals; gorillas

Polyandry

as polygyny but male / female roles reversed e.g. jacana

Monogamy

one male and one female form a breeding pair and mate exclusively with another, more common in birds than mammals, possibly due to egg vulnerability

Four stages of reproductive behaviour

Sexual attraction


Appetitive behaviours


Copulation


Postcopulatory behaviours

Appetitive behaviours

Behaviours that establish, maintain or promote sexual interaction

Copulatory behaviours

sexual intercourse

Postcopulatory behaviours

Following copulation, animals will not mate again for a period of time called the refractory phase

Coolidge effect

Many animals show a shorter refractory phase if provided with a new partner

Two theories of sexual attraction

Mate-quality hypothesis


Receiver bias hypothesis

Mate-quality hypothesis

sexual signals provide potential mates with detailed information about the signal bearer;s quality as a mate


Assumes the natural receivers of a signal possess a biological afaptation enabling them to decode the signal


Therefore is SPECIES SPECIFIC

Receiver bias hypothesis

Receivers get some info from sexual signals e.g. sex, age, BUT finer details of receiver preferences arise from a learned bias


Therefore, is NOT SPECIES SPECIFIC

Can chickens be shown to prefer 'beautiful' human faces (Ghirlanda et al, 2004) 6 chickens shown

average M and F faces


Trained to peck to average M face / F face


Testing all faces from the figure presented four times without reinforcement

Can chickens be shown to prefer 'beautiful' human faces (Ghirlanda et al, 2004) 14 undergrads not trained, but asked to

rate faces in random order and on a scale from 1 to 10 on how desirable it would be to go on a date with each one

Can chickens be shown to prefer 'beautiful' human faces (Ghirlanda et al, 2004) findings

Human and chicken behaviour almost identical


Chickens showed same preferences as humans


Chickens picked up on M and F attractiveness traits to respond to 2 not previously seen faces

Can chickens be shown to prefer 'beautiful' human faces (Ghirlanda et al, 2004) conclusion

supports receiver bias hypothesis of sexual mate attraction


- non human species demonstrated human style partner pregerences


Receiver get some info from sexual signals


BUT finer details of receiver preferences arise from a learned processing bias


does not support the mate-quality hypothesis - if a face-specific adaptation for mate selection exists in humans, why would chicks show similar preference

Problem with evolution theory

overemphasises the role of the environment in shaping how species evolve (natural selection), but ignores the role of mate selection processes (sexual selection)


Argues that human intelligence is more likely to have arisen from sexual selection, not sexual selection

what else does sexual selection explain?

more expressive aspects of the human mind, including art, music and language

Is intelligence correlated with semen quality? (Arden et al. 2008) 425 male US army veterans

semen samples video recorded and assessed for sperm concentration, sperm count and sperm mobility


intelligence assessed using 5 neuropsychological tests, including the Wechsler scale, wide range achievement test, and the army classification battery

Is intelligence correlated with semen quality? (Arden et al. 2008) findings

significant correlations between 3 measures of sperm quality, and intelligence


Small correlations, but similar magnitude to other bodily intelligence correlations


Supports idea that intelligence represents 1 aspect of a general fitness trait, and also supports the sexual selection hypothesis of intelligence

Is the size of the Interstitial nuclei of the anterior hypothalamus (2 and 3) different in homosexual compared to heterosexual men (LeVay, 1991)

brain tissue obtained during routine autopsies of 41 subjects


Microscope analysis showed no effects for INAH 1, 2, 4


INAH 3 twice as large in hetero mencompared to homo men


BUT this could be a prediction or consequence of sexual orientation - a biological basis for sexual orientation MAY or may NOT be desirable

Sexual reponse in women with history of CSA (Rellini et al, 2009) looked at

24 women with CSA history compared with those without CSA


control group shown no-sexual video

Sexual reponse in women with history of CSA (Rellini et al, 2009) measured

saliva samples to check for arousal (Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal activity)


Vaginal pulse amplitude measured with a photoplethysmograph


Self report scale of sexual arousal


PTSD symptoms assessed

Sexual reponse in women with history of CSA (Rellini et al, 2009) findngs

Cortisol: reduced in both groups, no difference across groups, PTSD associated with increased cortisol levels


Photoplethysmograph: interaction of video x group - lesser vaginal pulse amplitude response to film in CSA group compared to controls


By controlling for PTSD, vaginal pulse amplitude reponse no longer differed across the CSA groups

Sexual reponse in women with history of CSA (Rellini et al, 2009) conclusion

Complex relationship between cortisol and sexual stimuli mediated by PTSD symptoms


complex - cortisol not predicted by CSA group


PTSD important because - predicted cortisol response AND blocked CSA group effects on physiological sexual arousal


suggests that PTSD mediates the relationship between cortisol and sexual stimuli.