• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/67

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

67 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Leech experiment

4 somatosensory neurons for avoiding different directionsNormally picks direction from weighted sum of firing, determined by electrical stim (with known vectors) of different neurons

time varying population codes

needed for olfaction, same neurons, different timing

Noise from neuron itself

Variable number of vesicles are sent out Different firing/excitation thresholds for dif cells Failure to cross synapse Background brain activity

broad location of categorization in brain

cortical response


ventral/dorsal parts of visual pathway correspond to ‘what’ and ‘where’, or ‘perception’ and ‘action’ (i.e., ventral à object recognition; dorsal à motion

inferotemporal cortex (IT)

contains things such as “hand” (i.e. highly resolved specific object) responsive cells


Such neurons respond only to assembled parts and:Any sizeAny positionAny orientation

IT KO

prevents identification of objects by name

Hierarchical theory of object recognition

from V1->V4, ventral visual pathway, neurons respond to increasingly complex features, by pooling the information from the neurons in the layer below

evidence: neural responses occur with progressively longer latencies along the ventral pathway




problem: (1): too many objects / not enough cells !! - problem (2): not robust to damage

plastic theory of object recognition

neurons that respond to the same object under different conditions become linked together over time, forming an 'ensemble'

supported by morph/troll experiments

McGurk effect

ba/fa

prefrontal neurons track

the category choice (one or the other), rather than sensory input (graded)

prefrontal cortex KO

disrupts ability to flexibly categorize visual objects according multiple criteria


(wisconsin card sort)

ventral visual pathway

V1 à V2 à V4 à IT

Superior colliculus

subcortical visual area, receives direct input from retina and auditory and somatosensory systems. contains two topographic sensory maps: of visual input and of auditory space. maps are contained in different layers linked to both direction of attention to a specific location, as well as to guidance of eye movements

multisensory enhancement is strongest when

(i) both stimuli come from the same region of space, and (ii) receptive fields of the neurons overlap

how sensory info is weighted

by accuracy

Parietal cortex

neurons have receptive fields that sample the same region in both visual and auditory space (albeit more broadly)

also, firing scales with the amount of reward associated with the target; amount of payoff

multisensory crosstalk evidence

Brain regions associated only with vision or audio or smell etc. also show responses to opposite sensory inputs




Ex. The potato chips r so crispy

frog eye rotation effects

after eye is rotated: same connections (tectum to colliculus), but retinal visual field is now rotated relative to tectum

nasal RGC axons -> temporal RGC axons pattern determination

increased EphA, decreased ephrinA5

EphB

does medial/lateral patterning (of visual areas)

cortical development

occurs ‘inside out’ - neural stem cell progenitors at the base of the developing X continually divide and produce new neurons that migrate outwards - is build vertically (‘columns')

FGF8

alters global position of somatosensory cortex

chemoaffinity hypothesis evidence

(Sperry) - stereotyped wiring between retina and optic tectum of frog - connections depend on location in tissue, not in sensory space à neurons in source / target tissue have inherent ‘matching’ cues

synaptic pruning

at each, there is a ‘winner’ (the one with more activity) and a ‘loser’

extra frog eye effects

competition induces ocular dominance columns (on the cortical side where its inputs go) (not normally present in this system)

glutamate encourages

dendritic spine growth

molecular basis of reliance on correlation for synaptic strengthening

normally, the channel pore is blocked by Mg2+, so no little/no current even if glutamate binds. Ions pass only when the cell is already depolarized (e.g. during correlated activity from several inputs at once)

many inputs (correlated activity): many AMPA receptors activated; more depolarization; Mg2+ block is removed; NMDA activation à strengthening of synapse

NMDA receptor KO

tectum patterning is lost

effects of vision limited to moving bars

cortex only ‘learns’ the direction to which it was exposed

Hubel and Wiesel

first observation of critical periods was in the visual cortex

critical period timing across different layers of processing

areas with more complex functional roles also tend to have timing that is delayed relative to ‘simpler’ / ‘earlier’ areas




ex. inputs to olfactory bulb followed by olfactory cortex

effects of dark rearing or white noise

both onset and closure of critical periods is delayed

What determines the end of critical periods?

synaptic plasticity & stabilization - inhibitory circuits - structural factors

Use of NMDA receptors in timing

(1) channels stay open longer, and allow more Ca2+ influx(2) NR2B is preferentially coupled to downstream signaling pathways for driving changes in synaptic strength

developmental timing usage of NMDA receptor types

NMDA-2B to NMDA-2A

GABA

connections with inhibitory neurons using X mature with the same time course as critical periods, separates the firing in different populations of neurons, then limits the time window during which neurons are active

KO or increase of GABA action

prolongs or hastens the critical period end

evidence for cortical "flexibility"

surgically redirecting visual inputs to auditory thalamus results in the formation of normal visual maps and sensory responses in AUDITORY X

metaplasticity

thresholds for driving modifications in synaptic strength are altered by previous history. Prolonged periods of lower activity (e.g. darkrearing) lowers threshold for increasing synaptic strength

Aplysia

touching siphon leads to withdrawal reflex. Pairing siphon touch with shock increases withdrawal.

locus ceruleus

releases noradrenaline widely throughout the brain and LC activity linked to arousal state and strongly engaging contexts

basal forebrain (nucleus basalis) and brainstem

ACh systems: widespread ACh release; facilitates plasticity, activated most strongly when a sensory stimulus is salient / surprising / engages attention

CF-FM call

constant, narrow band frequency: ideal for Doppler type detection - any movement of the target will shift frequency of the returned echo

FM-call

frequency modulated: rapid upward/downward shifts in frequency spectrum over a few milliseconds

FM-FM area

different sets of neurons that will be activated at different distances away from the target (echo return delay), organised in increasing order in cortex

DSCF (doppler shift constant frequency) area

area expanded representation of frequencies close to the emitted pulse

bat active sampling strategies

systematic modulation of sonar emission frequency depending on approach phase & distance to prey (avoids overlap for successive pulses) - directional emission of sonar calls; sequential targeting of different objects / obstacles

passive electroreception method

Tight junctions in the skin make it a HIGH-resistance pathway. - Ohm’s law: current flow driven by local voltage fields thus preferentially passes through the canal of the ampullae instead; where it flows through the tissue surrounding the electroreceptors, creating a local voltage gradient

active electric organ

modified muscle cells - polarized cells: one side has a high concentration of ATP-dependent Na+/K+ pumps, producing resting membrane potential - other side has a high concentration of ACh receptors and is innervated by motor inputs from a pacemaker nucleus. Synchronized inputs open receptors causing current flow into cell

objects in the field created by the fish will either increase or decrease local current densit

corollory discharge

a copy of a motor command (electrosensing) that is sent to the muscles to produce a movement. This copy or corollary does not produce any movement itself but instead is directed to other regions of the brain to inform them of the impending movement

MUPs and female hormones

sexy during estrus, downregged by prog

sexually dimorphic processing of same cue example

CVA causes aggression or receptiveness by alt splicing of “fruitless”. gay flies produced by changing fru splicing

Sketchy evidence of pheromone detection in humans

exposure to axillary-derived odors affects the timing of the menstrual cycle in human women. Also vno receptors in main olfac bulb

AOB neurons

encode chemosignals with information about individual identity: show strong selectivity for sex, gender, and strain




used in Bruce effect

Bruce effect

Mating suppresses mitral cell output. Suppression is specific to stud-activated MCs

limbic system

(hypothalamus); -‘emotional/salience’ areas (amygdala) - reward structures (dopamine system) -memory structures (hippocampus); - higher cortical areas (prefrontal cortex)

Rodent TAARs

respond to amine containing compounds found in the urine of carnivores/predators

conditioned fear extinction

first encoded in amygdala


then not really lost; but overwritten by another memory - extinction is controlled by top-down inputs to the amygdala from prefrontal cortex

Hippocampus

provides data to PFC about overall sensory context to decide whether fear memory should be expressed or suppressed




also, Navigation is robust to lost placemarks pattern completion

MPC (medial premotor cortex)

increases in firing are nearly perfectly correlated with the monkey’s subjective report of perception.

Attractor network definition/formation

neurons in brain area ‘X’ that receive sensory input; neurons are heavily interconnected with each other.

Sensory input causes hebbian plasticity


subsequently , partial sensory input will activate the whole circuit

LIP of parietal cortex

neurons act as if they are accumulating sensory information: - more coherence between dots -> more bias in evidence for one direction-> faster increase in firing rate of neurons

Bottom up attention

arises from properties of raw sensory input; ‘pop-out effect’ arises from disruption of background regularity in some dimension

saliency depends on level of difference from background features

ACh systems roles in attention

a stimulus entering activates X cells in nucleus basalis leads to changes in the cortical processing of sensory stimuli

Top down attention

directing attention, improves speed/sensitivity
in general, attentional changes become more prominent in higher processing areas (ex. V4, MT)

heavily involves parietal regions and pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus

PREMOTOR theory of covert attention

the same systems that produce overt attention via eye movements may also be responsible for the amplifying effects of X, eye movements are driven by activation of neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) , stimulating the FEF also increases the firing of visual neurons

posterior->anterior brain

Emx2 down, Pax6 up