• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
How does Brendan O'Leary define partition?
Brendan O'Leary says partition is an externally proposed and imposed fresh border cut through at least one community's national homeland.
What is partition?
External (often a strategy of divide and quit).
Imposed.
Creates new states.
Method for eliminating difference (in theory).
What are examples of Partition?
Post-WWII Germany, Cyprus 1974, India/Pakistan 1947-8.
What was the ethnic division in Cyprus?
National division: Greek Cypriot: Turkish Cypriot= 75:25
What is the background to Cyprus partition?
ethnic divide
-Post-Independence (1960) consociationalism failed.
1963: Unrest= international forces enter.
1974: Partition: 45,000 to the north, 160,000 to the South.
Annan Plan: Cyprus enters the EU... still divide
Define Secession according to Brendan O'Leary
An action of regions or provinces.
What is Secession?
Internal, at the iniative of the region.
e.g. Bangladesh, Slovakia, Eritrea, South Sudan.
A method of eliminating difference (in theory).
Facilitating conditions: international context, liberal democracy?
Is there a right to secede?
Theories include; remedial right, Plebiscitary right, self-determination right.
What was the 1995 Quebec Independence Referendum?
"No" vote won only very narrowly (50.58% vs. 49.42%.
Federal government asked the Supreme court to consider if there was a right to secede.
Clarity Act 2000
What are the Caveats of secession?
-Difference between elites and population.
-What about new minorities?
-Who gets to decide? Who is 'we', the people?
-What are you deciding on? What is the question?
What are secession caveats according to Ivor Jennings?
On the surface, the principle of self-determination seems reasonable: let the people decide. It is in fact ridiculous because the people cannot decide until somebody decides who are the people.
Should Scotland secede?
I think they should be allowed to.
Scotland is an ancient nation and a modern society
Let the people decide (that's what Ivor Jennings would say).
What are the forms of Executive power-sharing?
-Mandatory/voluntary
-liberal/ Ethnically-specified.
-Unitary/Devolved.
-Externally enforced/ domestically driven.
-Electoral basis and whether communal blocs are insulate from each other ("god fences make good neighbours).
-type of conflict: settlement or avoidance of civil warfare?
Issue is not just managing conflict in short-term, but resolving it in the longer-term.
What are the principles of liberal democracy?
Consent of the governed.
-Free and Fair elections.
-Freedoms of political expression, speech and press.
-Equality in the sense of one person, one vote.
-Right to vote and stand for office.
-Equality before the law.
What constitutes a Majoritarian rule?
1: Majority (single-party) government- party with plurality of seats can control executive.
2: Adversarial: Opposition holds government to account.
3: Assumes alternation of parties in government over time: relies on trust in system.
E.g. Westminster system, NZ pre-1996
What are the critiques of Majoritarian rule form a divided society perspective?
Conditions for alternation, trust and stable democracy are not always present.
Ethnic, linguistic, religious minority groups might be permanent excluded from power by majoritarian system.
What would you want to engineer into a divided society?
Stability, Democracy and Recognition (justice). Other moral principles include:
-social and economic justice.
-equality of opportunity.
-Not creating new injustices.
-Maintaining or generating trust among groups.
Respect for and recognition of people's identities.
In a non-democratic society, what are the options of 'fixing' the range of diversity, that have been employed in the past?
Genocide: Nazi Germany, Rwanda, Khmer Rouge.
Ethnic Expulsion: Volkdeutsche, post WWII.
Control Policies: South Africa, Pre-1994
Ethnic Hierarchies: Colonial States (e.g. British in Nigeria) intervened in re-ordering existing ethnic, religious and linguistic hierarchies.
Assimilation: Project of turning "Peasants into Frenchmen" in 19th Century France.
What is the integrationist approach?
-Differences should be left to the private sphere, In the public sphere there should be a unified nation, privileges individual citizens, not group, a s a unit of society.
Identities seen as malleable; strong group identities not inevitable.
What is the Accommodationist approach?
Differences in the public sphere are tolerated (and sometimes encouraged.
Believes people have strong attachments to their group identities.
-Group-based identities seen as durable.
-Organises public life an dinstitutions around distinct ethic, linguistic or religious group identities.
But variety of views as to whether inter-ethnic cooperation should be pushed.