• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/26

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

26 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
PL 94-142
affordable rights and responsibilities for all students in special education; PARC vs. Penn and Mills vs. BOE provided basis for law
PL 99-457
infants and toddlers act, extended rights to younger children
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
civil rights law, guarantees access to school building and to curriculum; applies to all facilities that receive federal dollars; eligibility includes any student who suffers from a temporary or permanent physical or mental handicap, must "substantially" limit one or more major life activities, including learning; broader than the 13 IDEA categories
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974
(FERPA)
sometimes called the Buckley Amendment; gives family the right to review their child's records; files are kept confidential
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
civil rights legislation; prohibits discrimination of people with disabilities in education, employment, government; requires schools to make reasonable accommodations for students with disabilities
IDEA (1990, 1997, 2004)
requires equal educational opportunities for all children, special education is not a place but a set of services
-zero-reject (can't deny child with disability an education; if disruptive but is manifestation of their disability, have to educate)
-non-discriminatory assessment
-free and appropriate public education (FAPE): includes IEP
-least restrictive environment (LRE): included in regular classroom as much as possible
-due process: parental consent, confidentiality
-parent participation: at every step, increases ownership and understanding
No Child Left Behind (NCLB, 2001)
provides opportunities for children whose schools aren’t meeting expectations. Requires statewide testing in reading and math, eventually in more subjects. Highly qualified teachers based on objective measures. Choice for parents – can choose different school if their school not meeting AYP
Brown vs Board of Education, 1954
anti-segregation law; educational facilities cannot segregate according to race
Debra P. vs Turlington, 1983
FL judge said school can deny diploma to students that did not pass state test; they received certificate of completion instead
Diana vs State Board of Education
assessments must be administered in native language of student
Guadalupe Organization, Inc. vs Tempe School District, 1972
students cannot be identified as MR unless they were properly assessed by considering primary language and were at least two standard deviations below the mean
Hobson vs Hanson, 1967
schools must provide equal educational opportunities despite a family's SES; tracking is violation of equal protection clause
Honig vs Doe
students in special education must have a manifestation hearing to review placement if they are suspended for more than 10 days
Larry P. vs Riles, 1970
overrepresentation of minorities classified as MR; percentage of minority students placed in special ed classrooms cannot exceed the percentage in population; no IQ testing in CA for minorities unless for GT program
Lau vs Nichols, 1974
schools must provide accommodations (bilingual education) for ELL students
Marshall vs. Georgia, 1984
In contrast to Larry P., percentage of minorities in sped can exceed percentage in population if appropriate and proper steps for placement were followed
Mills vs. Board of Education of the District of Columbia, 1972
schools complained about cost of educating kids with disabilities. Said money must be split evenly
Oberti vs. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District, 1993
said that a boy with Down Syndrome should receive education in neighborhood school
PASE vs. Hannon, 1980
can use standardized tests as long as they are not culturally biased and are used with several other measures
PARC vs. Penn, 1972
parents wanted schools to teach their children with MR. Must find and educate all students with MR to fullest extent – origin of Child Find
Pesce vs. J. Sterling Morton High School, 1987
ruled in favor of school that suspended faculty member for delaying report of suspected child abuse by another teacher
Rowley vs. Board of Education, 1982
public schools do not have to provide the best education, just an adequate education
Stell vs. Board of Education, 1963
minorities doing poorly on standardized tests; cannot use testing to track children
Tarasoff vs. The Regents of the University of California, 1976
school district has a duty to warn parents if their child is in danger
Tatro vs. Irving Independent School District, 1984
student with spina bifida, needed to be catheterized during school hours. Is a related service, must be done in school – related to education because must be done for her to participate in special education
Tinker vs. Des Moines, 1969
1st amendment – student wanted to wear armband to protest the war. Can wear if doesn’t violate others