• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/46

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

46 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Marbury v. Madison

established Judicial Review

Supreme Court Jurisdiction

cases involving ambassadors, public ministers, or when the U.S. itself is a party

Writ of Certiorari

a petition to the higher court that commands the lower court to send the case forward

Ex Parte McCardle

Congress cannot withdraw jurisdiction that was previously exercised by the Supreme Court

Martin v. Hunter's Lessee

Supreme Court authority over state courts in civil matters of federal law

Baker v. Carr

The redistricting of state legislative districts is not a political question, and thus is justiciable by the federal courts.

Flast v. Cohen

taxpayers have standing to sue the government to prevent unconstitutional use of funds

McCulloch v. Maryland

Grants Congress implied powers, right to create banks under enumerated power to coin money

Dredd Scott v. Sanford

African Americans are not citizens and therefore do not have standing to sue

New York v. US

Congress cannot compel state regulation

Printz v. US

Congress cannot force local law enforcement to enforce national gun policy

US v. Comstock

federal government has authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause to order the civil commitment of a mentally ill person past his or her sentence

Cohens v. Virginia

U.S. Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction for any U.S. case and final say.

Alden v. Maine

Congress cannot force nonconsenting states to hear private suits in their own courts

Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council

Federal sanctions override state sanctions under the Supremacy clause, limiting state sanctioning abilities

Jacobson v. Massachusetts

the state may restrict personal liberty to ensure health and prosperity

California v. Edwards

A state cannot prohibit indigent people from moving into it.

Arizona v. US

State law cannot usurp the federal government's authority to regulate immigration laws and enforcement

Philadelphia v. New Jersey

A state may not place barriers on commerce entering or exiting its boundaries without expressed Congressional authorization or a compelling state interest

Pacific Gas & Electric et al. v. State Energy Resources Conservation and Development

States are not preempted by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 until the government has put in place a method for disposing of nuclear waste

11th Amendment

Overrules Chisholm v. Georgia, keeps citizens from suing the state

10th Amendment

The federal government only possesses power given to it by the states or the people

Formalism

Constitution creates clear boundaries between branches

Functionalism

Shared rather than separate powers

The Nondelegation Doctrine

Congress should not delegate its lawmaking functions to any other bodies

Wayman v. Southard

Establishes intelligible principle test related to the Nondelegation Doctrine

Mistretta v. US

The delegation of minimum sentencing laws passed the intelligible principle test

Immigration and Nationalization Service v. Chadha

Congress may not pass a statute that grants itself a legislative veto over actions of the executive branch

Bowsher v. Synar

Congress cannot assign enforcement duties to legislative bodies

The Prize Cases

Conditions can determine the state of war without Congress declaring it

Ex Parte Milligan

The President cannot suspend writs of habeus corpus; military tribunals cannot try citizens

Ex Parte Quirin

US status does not entitle you to habeus corpus if you are belligerent; belligerents are not entitled to the rights of prisoners of war

Hamdi v. Rumsfeld

U.S. citizens designated as enemy combatants have the right to challenge that status under the Due Process Clause

Korematsu v. US

The relocation order of US citizens is constitutional under fear of invasion

Youngstown Sheet and Tube v. Sawyer

Jackson's concurring opinion established executive power test:



Most power - Congressional authorization


Intermediate - Acting without denial or consent


Least - Acting against expressed opinion of Congress

Dames and Moore v. Regan

The president's freezing of Iranian assets was constitutional under Jackson's framework in Youngstown

War Powers Resolution of 1973

President can only send troops into a conflict abroad with the approval of Congress

Powell v. McCormack

Congress cannot alter the qualifications of its members outside of the qualifications set by the Constitution

Gravel v. US

The Constitution's Speech and Debate Clause extends to Congressional aides

Kilbourn v. Thompson

Established 3 prong test for Investigative Powers:


1. Areas of investigation must not invade areas reserved to the courts or executive


2. Must deal with subjects Congress could validly legislate


3. Must suggest a congressional interest in legislating the subject

McGrain v. Daugherty

Congress can compel a private individual to testify but the matter must be related to a legislative function for which legislation would remedy

Watkins v. US

Congress must be clear about the purpose of investigations and make the object clear to the witness

Barenblatt v. US

1st Amendment is trumped by the necessary government objectives to fight communism

US v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp

Authority over foreign affairs is an inherent power

Michigan v. Long

States should take measures to state when their decisions are purely based on state law to prevent US Supreme Court jurisdiction

US Term Limits v. Thorton

The US Constitution is the sole source of all qualifications for elected officials in the Senate and Congress