Rules Of Evidence

Front 1

401

Back 1

Relevant evidence is anything that makes the existence or nonexistence of a crucial fact more or less likely.

Front 2

403

Back 2

Evidence which would be a waste of the court's time, would confuse the jury, or is more prejudicial than probative can be excluded.

Front 3

404(a)

Back 3

Character evidence cannot be introduced to prove conformity therewith, with exceptions.

Front 4

404(a)(1)

Back 4

Character evidence can be introduced to show a pertinent character trait of the accused, or to rebut the same

Front 5

404(a)(2)

Back 5

Character evidence can be introduced to show a pertinent character trait of the victim, or to rebut the same.

Front 6

404(a)(3)

Back 6

Character evidence exceptions concerning the character of a witness, elaborated in 607, 608, and 609.

Front 7

404(a)(4)

Back 7

Previous acts cannot be introduced to show conformity therewith; they can be used for "other purposes," including motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.

Front 8

405(a)

Back 8

If character evidence is admissible, it can be provided via reputation or the opinion of a witness.

Front 9

405(b)

Back 9

In cases where character is the essential element of a charge, character evidence can be introduced through specific instances of conduct.

Front 10

406

Back 10

Evidence of habit or routine practice can be used to show conformity with said practices.

Front 11

407

Back 11

The introduction of remedial measures after a harmful event does not prove liability.

Front 12

408

Back 12

An offer to compromise on a claim does not prove liability or make the claim invalid.

Front 13

409

Back 13

Offering to pay medical bills cannot be used to prove liability for the injury.

Front 14

410

Back 14

Statements made in a withdrawn guilty plea, in a plea of nolo contendre, or during plea discussions are inadmissible.

Front 15

411

Back 15

Failure to be insured against liability is not proof of negligence.

Front 16

602

Back 16

A witness cannot testify about an event unless they have personal knowledge of it.

Front 17

607

Back 17

The credibility of a witness can be attacked by any party.

Front 18

608(a)

Back 18

The character of a witness can be attacked using opinion or reputation, but only if it goes to the witness's truthfulness or untruthfulness.

Front 19

608(b)

Back 19

A witness's truthfulness or untruthfulness can be demonstrated through specific instances of conduct, if the judge rules it probative.

Front 20

609(a)(1)

Back 20

If a witness has been convicted of a crime, the conviction can be introduced only if the crime is punishable by either death or more than a year's imprisonment.

Front 21

609(a)(2)

Back 21

Any criminal convictions relating to dishonesty or false statements are admissible.

Front 22

609(b)

Back 22

Evidence of previous criminal convictions are inadmissible if more than ten years have elapsed since either the conviction or the termination of punishment.

Front 23

609(c)

Back 23

A criminal conviction is inadmissible if the witness has been shown to be rehabilitated or was found to be innocent.

Front 24

609(d)

Back 24

Juvenile adjudications are inadmissible, unless the court finds them to be probative.

Front 25

609(e)

Back 25

Just because an appeal is pending does not make a criminal conviction inadmissible.

Front 26

610

Back 26

Religious beliefs cannot be used to bolster a witness's credibility.

Front 27

611(b)

Back 27

Cross-examination should be limited to 1) issues raised on direct 2) issues of credibility.

Front 28

612

Back 28

A witness may use any material provided by AMTA to refresh their memory before or during testimony.

Front 29

613(a)

Back 29

If an attorney is cross-examining a witness regarding a prior statement, he need not show the witness the statement in question.

Front 30

613(b)

Back 30

A witness must be given a chance to defend themselves when presented with evidence of an inconsistent statement.

Front 31

701

Back 31

A lay witness can testify to their opinion only if it is 1) based on their rational perception 2) necessary to understand their testimony 3) not based on any specialized knowledge.

Front 32

703

Back 32

An expert witness can use facts not normally admissible in order to make their conclusions; the underlying facts can only be introduced at the court's discretion.

Front 33

704(a)

Back 33

Opinions as to the ultimate issue are not necessarily inadmissible.

Front 34

704(b)

Back 34

An expert witness cannot testify as to the mental state of the defendant at the time of the alleged crime.

Front 35

705

Back 35

An expert witness can give their conclusions without testifying to the underlying facts.