Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
51 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Fallacies |
fallacies |
|
ipse dixit |
illegitimate appeal to authority |
|
ad populum |
appeal to the masses |
|
ad baculum |
appeal to force |
|
ad hominem |
attacking the person, rather than the argument |
|
ambiguity |
using double meaning to confuse |
|
bulverism |
assuming the argument is wrong, then attacking the person for holding the belief |
|
to quoque |
pointing out an inconsistency in another and ignoring the inconsistency in oneself |
|
ad ignoratium |
an appeal to a lack of knowledge * an argument from silence |
|
chronological snobbery |
discarding an argument on the basis of time/age |
|
Fallacy of equivocation |
one of the terms has more than one meaning |
|
Fallacy of accent or emphasis |
meaning changes by emphasizing one word |
|
Fallacy of selective arrangement |
organizing facts for the purpose of directing the hearer to a specific conclusion |
|
Fallacy of amphiboly |
the complete statement is ambiguous |
|
Fallacy of composition |
if it's true of the parts, then it must be true of the whole |
|
Fallacy of division |
If it's true of the whole, then it's true of the parts |
|
petitio principii circular reasoning |
begging the question |
|
post hoc |
a false cause |
|
either/or |
ex. You didn't vote for George W.? You must be either stupid or a communist |
|
complex question |
the question is arranged to exclude a legitimate answer |
|
apriorism hasty generalization |
drawing a conclusion without adequate information |
|
L.17-21 |
. |
|
Define ordinary, scientific, and poetic |
very easy to do, do it in your head} you are welcome |
|
3 elements in the poetic approach to meaning |
requires qualification,uses concrete words, oblique corellation}not precise (in total) |
|
Define Chiasm |
a repeatable phrase in reverse order |
|
Stasis theory >G "to stand" |
asking questions to help build a speech |
|
What is the difference between a definite(or specific) and indefinite(or general) issue? |
Definite}limited Indefinite}broad |
|
What is hypothesis? |
issue that involves actual situations |
|
What is thesis? |
issue of situations that are broad |
|
What does Quintillian say about subdividing the general questions further? |
questions of knowledge and actions |
|
What are the four staseis? |
conjecture, definition, quality, procedure {Cute Dogs Quit Playing} |
|
conjecture |
Did it happen? |
|
definition |
What kind of thing is it? |
|
quality |
Was it right or wrong? |
|
procedure |
What should we do about it? |
|
Is your narratio part of your argument? |
no; it is only the laying out of facts |
|
What is the simplest way to proceed in your invention for your refutatio? |
Learning your opponent's side |
|
What is the strategic point? |
occurs when your point is decisive and reachable} you 'capture' your opponent, a turning point in the argument |
|
What is an inescapable point? |
can't get passed the issue |
|
What does Quintillian say the exordium is for? |
to prepare the audience to listen |
|
What should you guard against in the narratio? |
do not lay out your argument just the facts |
|
What illustration does Quintillian give to describe the partitio? |
Mile markers |
|
What should you do with the weaker arguments? |
"cluster" them together to support each other |
|
What should be avoided in the conclusion? |
summaries and gloating |
|
name two steps in arrangement |
1)pick which arguments will be used 2)place them in order that is clear & persuasive |
|
two types of exordia |
1)Introduction 2)Insinuation |
|
name five types of situations which you might face |
1)honorable 2)difficult 3)mean 4)ambiguous 5)obscure |
|
What did Quintillian say the narratio had to do? |
should state the facts and stick with them |
|
What do you do in the partitio? |
make clear the issues at hand |
|
What should the arrangement of your arguments be in your confirmatio? |
the stronger arguments should be on either side of the weaker arguments to hold the weaker ones up |
|
What do you do in the peroratio? |
1)sum up what you've argued 2)put a dent in your opponent's ethos 3)arose sympathy for the case (pathos) |