• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/51

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

51 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Fallacies

fallacies

ipse dixit

illegitimate appeal to authority

ad populum

appeal to the masses

ad baculum

appeal to force

ad hominem

attacking the person, rather than the argument

ambiguity

using double meaning to confuse

bulverism

assuming the argument is wrong, then attacking the person for holding the belief

to quoque

pointing out an inconsistency in another and ignoring the inconsistency in oneself

ad ignoratium

an appeal to a lack of knowledge


* an argument from silence

chronological snobbery

discarding an argument on the basis of time/age

Fallacy of equivocation

one of the terms has more than one meaning

Fallacy of accent or emphasis

meaning changes by emphasizing one word

Fallacy of selective arrangement

organizing facts for the purpose of directing the hearer to a specific conclusion

Fallacy of amphiboly

the complete statement is ambiguous

Fallacy of composition

if it's true of the parts, then it must be true of the whole

Fallacy of division

If it's true of the whole, then it's true of the parts

petitio principii


circular reasoning

begging the question

post hoc

a false cause

either/or

ex. You didn't vote for George W.? You must be either stupid or a communist

complex question

the question is arranged to exclude a legitimate answer

apriorism


hasty generalization

drawing a conclusion without adequate information

L.17-21

.

Define ordinary, scientific, and poetic

very easy to do, do it in your head} you are welcome

3 elements in the poetic approach to meaning

requires qualification,uses concrete words, oblique corellation}not precise (in total)

Define Chiasm

a repeatable phrase in reverse order

Stasis theory


>G "to stand"

asking questions to help build a speech

What is the difference between a definite(or specific) and indefinite(or general) issue?

Definite}limited


Indefinite}broad

What is hypothesis?

issue that involves actual situations

What is thesis?

issue of situations that are broad

What does Quintillian say about subdividing the general questions further?

questions of knowledge and actions

What are the four staseis?

conjecture, definition, quality, procedure


{Cute Dogs Quit Playing}

conjecture

Did it happen?

definition

What kind of thing is it?

quality

Was it right or wrong?

procedure

What should we do about it?

Is your narratio part of your argument?

no; it is only the laying out of facts

What is the simplest way to proceed in your invention for your refutatio?

Learning your opponent's side

What is the strategic point?

occurs when your point is decisive and reachable} you 'capture' your opponent, a turning point in the argument

What is an inescapable point?

can't get passed the issue

What does Quintillian say the exordium is for?

to prepare the audience to listen

What should you guard against in the narratio?

do not lay out your argument just the facts

What illustration does Quintillian give to describe the partitio?

Mile markers

What should you do with the weaker arguments?

"cluster" them together to support each other

What should be avoided in the conclusion?

summaries and gloating

name two steps in arrangement

1)pick which arguments will be used


2)place them in order that is clear & persuasive

two types of exordia

1)Introduction


2)Insinuation

name five types of situations which you might face

1)honorable


2)difficult


3)mean


4)ambiguous


5)obscure

What did Quintillian say the narratio had to do?

should state the facts and stick with them

What do you do in the partitio?

make clear the issues at hand

What should the arrangement of your arguments be in your confirmatio?

the stronger arguments should be on either side of the weaker arguments to hold the weaker ones up

What do you do in the peroratio?

1)sum up what you've argued


2)put a dent in your opponent's ethos


3)arose sympathy for the case (pathos)