Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
33 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
null hypotheses
|
-two variables are NOT related
|
|
alternative hypotheses
|
-two variables ARE related
-one may cause the other |
|
qualitative data
|
-verbal descriptions of attributes of events
*words |
|
quantitative data
|
-numerical descrpitions of attributes of events
*numbers |
|
validity
|
-the degree to which an instruments measures what it is supposed to measure
|
|
types of validity
|
-predictive/criterion
-concurrent -construct -content |
|
Predictive/criterion validity
|
-the accuracy in which a test predicts future performance on a related task
-ex: gre scores may predict performance in gradschool |
|
concurrent validity
|
- the extent that a new test correllates with an established test
|
|
construct validity
|
- the degree to which test scores are consistent with theoretical constructs or concepts
|
|
content validity
|
- examines all test items to ensure if they measure the full range of skill being tested
|
|
reliability
|
- consistency in which the same event is measured repeatedly
- expressed in correlational coeeficient |
|
test retest relaibility
|
- consistency of measures when the same test is given 2x to the same person
|
|
alternate form reliability
|
- consisitency of 2 parralel forms of the same test
- ex EVT-2 form A and form B |
|
split-half reliability
|
- responses on the 1st 1/2 of test are correlated with responses on 2nd 1/2
|
|
intERobserver intERjudge relaibility
|
- the extent to which 2 or more observers agree in measuring an event
|
|
intRAobserver-intRAjudge relaibility
|
-extent that the smae observer repeatedly measures the same event
|
|
independent variable
|
- directly manipulated by the experimenter (cause)
ex: amount of noise in enviorment |
|
dependent variable
|
- -the vairable that is affected by manipulation of the independent variable (effect)
*ex: amount of difficulty hearing speech *all disorders are DV's |
|
types of experimental designs in SLP
|
-group & single-subject
|
|
group designs-experimental
|
-consists of 2 or more groups, one that recieves tx one that doesn't
-groups are formed using randomination or matching |
|
group designs-nonexperimental
|
- only 1 group
-research is observational or a case study |
|
pretest-posttest control group design
|
-measures effects of 1 tx
|
|
multigroup pretest-posttest design
|
-measures the effects of 2 or more tx's
ex: which tx is more effective |
|
advantages of group experiemtnla designs
|
- useful in isolating cause/effect realtionship
-strong internal validity (the manipulation of the Independent V. caused the change) |
|
disadvantages of group experimental designs
|
- not always possible to randomly select particpiants
-may not allow extension of study to indevidual clients |
|
single subject design
|
-establish caue-effect relationships based on individual performance
-allow extensive and intensive study of individual subjects -do NOT involve comparisons based on group performance -may have more than 1 participant, but results are not averaged they are resocred individually |
|
2 types of single subject design studies
|
-ABA &ABAB
- multiple baseline |
|
ABA
|
-basic single subject design
- A baseline, B tx, A withdrawal |
|
ABAB
|
-provides beneift to participant unlike ABA design
-A baseline, B tx, A withdrawal, B tx reinstated |
|
multiple baseline design
|
- subject design which avoids tx withdrawal phase
- 3 types: across subjects, across settings, across behaviors |
|
across subjects MB design
|
- sevral participants who are taught 1 or more behvior sequentailly
-shows that only behaviors of treated participant change |
|
across settings MB design
|
-behaior is taught sequentially in different settings
-demonstrates that behavior changhed only in treated setting |
|
across behaviors MB design
|
- several behaviors are sequentially taught
- shows that only treated behaviors change |