• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/35

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

35 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Dong & Wyne (2014)

Between Subjects Design




2 IV levels: Impression of opposite speaker, impression formed by opposite speaker




No difference in perceived length of convo



Cameron & Rutland (2006)

Mixed Subjects Factorial 3x2




Extended contact through reading on attitude toward disabled




Time of interview (pre and post contact)

Bartlett, Harris, Smith, and Bonds-Raacke (2005)

Between Subjects Design




Action figures on body image

Bartlett, Harris, Bruey (2008)

Between Subjects




Amount of blood in video games on aggression, hostility, and arousal

Farris, Treat, Viken, Mcfall (2008)

Between Subjects




Men more likely to misidentify friendly as sexually interested

Dr. Roberts @ The Mayo Clinic

Between Subjects




Men or Women


15% of sample mild cognitive impairment




Men 1.5x more likely to show cognitive impairment

Pepsi Challenge

Within Subjects




Participants tasted both and decided which

Dommeyer (2008)

Factorial




Attractiveness & sex




Response to mail survey




Only variable with an effect was sex (women got more responders)

Darley & Batson (1973)

Between Subjects (& Factorial 3x2)




Jerusalem to Jericho


Hurry or not, passed a victim




Likelihood to help




2nd IV - Content of message to relay

Tamir, Mitchell, & Gross (2008)

Within Subjects Factorial (3x2)




Music preference while playing video games




Type of game & music type

Desrumaux, De Bosscher, and Leoni (2009)

Within Subjects Factorial 2x2




Gender & Attractiveness




Picture with resume




Attractive more likely to be hired

Single Case Design

Wilhelm Wundt - father of psychology - introspection




Early on mostly used in behavioral psych





Kelloggs (1933)

Single Case Design




Raised chimp, Gua




Early-life experiences

Single Case Design (Most used in)

clinical research - person with specified disorder


Unique or special populations (CEOs, etc)


Group or team (is single unit of analysis)

Ebbinghaus (1885)

Single case design (AB design)




Memory research on self




Savings of 57% of info




Forgetting curve

AB Design

pretest and posttest




Before & after IV

ABA Design

Most powerful




Before & after IV, then remove IV

Multiple Baselines design

receive IV @ different times

Casby & Moran (1998)

Mental imagery




Multiple baselines




No effect

Single case limitations

***non generalizability




carryover, order, & practice




fatigue/over evaluation

Interaction

Result from one IV depends on another

Main effect

Effect of IV on DV while ignoring other IVs

Janiszewski & Uy (2008)

Mixed Subjects Factorial




Given scenario influence on anchoring




Type of anchoring




10 levels of IV

Dunn, Huntsinger, Lun, & Sinclair (2008)

Gift cards

Descriptive Statistics

Used to describe dataset




Measures of central tendency

Aron, Aron, & Coups (2009) & Miller & Fiskin (1997)

men & women - desired # of partners




outliers/extreme scores made mean unreliable

Inferential statistics

Used to draw inference about population from sample




t-tests, ANOVA

Bonferroni Correction

When multiple t-tests, divide probability by N of tests

Lawlor, Timpson, Harbord, & Leary (2008)

mother BMI & child's fat mass @ 12




can't tell cause and effect

Feldman, Weller, Zagoory-Sharon, and Levine (2007)

oxytocin & bonding

Within-Subjects Advantages

(advantages)


Few participants


Less statistical variance


equal group size

Within-Subjects Disadvantages

(disadv)


Fatigue


Attrition


Carryover, order, practice

Between subjects advantages

(advantages)


No attrition


Little fatigue


Multiple DV measures


No carryover, order, practice effects

Between subjects disadvantages

(disadv)


more participants needed


more statistical variance


unequal group size

Parts of Discussion

Restate purpose


Evaluate hypothesis


Relate findings to previous research


Address limitations


Practical significance and future research