• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/45

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

45 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Holistic (behaviour explanation)
Richness of the description is focussed on.
Key aspects of qualitative
Flexible, detailed data, analyses direct speech, can be considered subjective
Positivism
Only knowledge of a person's experiences is worth noting.
Social constructivism
Groups construct knowledge for each other creating a small culture with shared artifacts and shared meanings
Describe a focus group
Collective interview where data is gathered through group interaction, with conversation steered by the researcher.
Generates broad data themes, can identify early issues.
Describe an interview
Structured/semi-structured/open ended.
Researcher is an active listener encouraging the ppt to reveal information on a certain topic.
Often video/audio recorded and transcribed later
Describe an observation
Describing and explaining the social world (ethnography) from a ppts perspective within that context.
Participant observers/non-participant observers/covert observation/overt observation
Ethnography
A person's cultural differences and beliefs impacting on behaviour.
Transcribing
Turning spoken words into written in preparation for analysis (pauses, erms, and intonation must be included)
Reliability
Measures should be stable over time and across investigators
Validity
The extent to which something measure what is it intended to measure
Ecological validity
What you're observing works in the real world
Fidelity of transcription
Exactness with which a transcription is created
Triangulation
Validation through cross verification of two of more sources
Reflexivity
Circular relationship between cause and effect- it is bidirectional
Grounding Theory
Close relationship between data and theory- theory is grounded in data (data is collected first)
Thematic analysis
An analysis of major themes found within data by using transcription and coding before reviewing themes
Discourse analysis
Analysis of language beyond individual words- sounds, meaning and syntax
IPA (Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis)
Focus on the lived experience of ppt and uses phenomenology and hermeneutics
Assumptions of IPA
People try to make sense of their experiences

Participants are experts on their experiences

Analysis is researchers interpretation of ppts exps
Phenomenology
"how things appear"- the systematic study of human consciousness, and rejects the idea of an objective reality
Hermeneutics
"the analysis of messages"- meaning as a social and cultural product from a first person perspective,
Disadvantages of qualitative style
Can be considered subjective
Subject to researcher bias, or poor inter-rater reliability
May be considered unscientific sue to lack of numerical data.
Induction
Arriving at a belief after examining data
Deduction
Predicting the outcome of data based on your beliefs
Falsifiability
Ability of a test to prove a theory wrong to allow improvements
Intervening variable
Hypothetical internal state that explains the relationship between IV and DV
Parsimony
Choosing the simplest explanation
Construct validity
Degree to which the IV and DV accurately reflect or measure what is intended
External validity
Degree to which you can generalise the findings of the data to the wider population/settings
Internal validity
Whether of not causal statements can be made about the relationships found
Naturalistic observations
Describing behaviour in a natural setting
Ethology
Study of naturally occurring behaviour
Inter-rater reliability
Correlation between observations made by two people
Case study
Naturalistic observation of one person
Survey
Large study of many people, usually generalisable.
Uses questionnaires and interviews
Meta-analyses
Re-analysis of large number of studies
Disadvantage of case study
Retrospective
May have motivated forgetting (reconstructing own memories of past experiences)
Common problems experienced in studies
Anthropomorphising- attributing animal behaviours to human characteristics
Reactivity- Subject roles/demand characteristics/response styles
Causation
If a result follows an event, then it may be safe to assume it influences it's occurance
Comparison
Having two groups, one experimental and one control to receive different levels of IV
Control group
No treatment occurs, they control for any changes which might occur in the absence of experimental variable
Give three potential reasons for a null result
No relationship
Inadequate manipulation
Other causes
What are the advantages of multiple independent variables?
More efficiency
Better control
Generalisability across IVs and levels of IV
Interactions
Experimental results occur when the effects of one IV depend on the level of other IVs