Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
250 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
1. Be able to compare and contrast the different methods of knowing.
|
a. Method of Knowing
b. Method of Intuition c. METHOD OF aUTHORITY d. Medthod of faith e. Rational Method f. Empirical Method |
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
holding onto ideas and beliefs simply because they have been accepted as facts for a long time or because of superstition. Based on habit and often used by advertisers.
|
method of tenacity
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
information accepted as true because if feels right. When a person relies on hunches or instinct to answer questions. Usually used in ethical or moral questions, and probably based on subtle cues that we pick up from the people around us.
|
method of intuition
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
person finds answers by seeking out authority on the subject. Relies on expertise of another person. Does not always provide accurate information and can be biased. Sometimes subjective and personal rather than valid. Answers often accept accepted without question and expertise can be generalized to include question we are asking.
|
method of authority
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
variant of the method of authority in which people have unquestioning trust in the authority figure, and therefore, accept information from the authority without doubt or challenge Unfortunately, not all experts are actually experts.
|
method of faith
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
also known as rationalism, seeks answers by logical reasoning. The premise statements describe facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true, and the argument is a set of premise statement that are logically combined to yield a conclusion. Often used when people try to think through a problem before they try out different solutions. ‘All As are Bs, therefor all Bs are As.’
|
Rational Method.
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
– attempts to answer questions by direct observation or personal experience.
|
Empirical Method
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
Reasoning that involves using relatively small set of specific observations as the basis for forming a general statement about a larger set of possible observations. Ex. Coming to the conclusion that people are more depressed in the winter, based on the observations of others and self.
|
Inductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
uses a general statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion about specific examples. Complementary to Inductive reasoning. Uses general conclusions to generate specific predictions.
|
Deductive REasoning
|
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
|
|
3. What is a hypothesis and what are the requirements for a good hypothesis?
|
a. A hypothesis identifies specific variables involved and describes how they are related, which forms the foundation of your research study.
b. A good hypothesis is usually founded in established theories or developed from the results of previous research. Also the logical conclusion of a logical argument. It must be testable and refutable, and make a positive statement about the existence of something, such as a relationship. |
