• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/45

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

45 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

ESRD

projected to contrinue to rise incidence with the increasing prevalance of diabetes in US




most common form of mgmt is hemodiaylsis, with transplants as the least common but increasing slowly in prevalance

Incident counts by race

Counts are increasing for black and americans but the rates are starting to decline

Causes of ESRD

diabetes is the most common in prevalance and incidence




then hypertension, then GN, then PCKD, other and unkown

Mgmt of CKD

either hemodiaylsis then renal transplant




peritoneal dialysis then transplant




or transplant

Relative risk of renal transplant vs diaylsis

relative risk of death goes from 2.84 to .32 after 2 years post transplant




transplant patients have a greater number of quality years of life




line to get transplant is continuing to grow and the age of that population is growing as well

Elderly patients

only after about 1.8 yrs post transplant does the transplant survival curve equal the wait list dialysis, due to complications from surgery and decreased healing in elderly

trends in transplantation

incidence rate is increasing but the transplant rate is decreasing given the rate of ESRD due to its faster growth than transplant can maintain




incidence of waitlist is growing as wells as transplant counts from both deceased and living donors

History of renal transplants

first long term success were identical twins in 1954, recipient survived over 1 year




by 1966 using direct cross match between donor lymphocytes and reicipent serum

Deceased vs living donor

deceased donors are less probable to result in survival compared to living donors

Blod typing

donor and recipient must be ABO compatible




endothelial cells have A or B antigens




most people have antibodies to the antigens they lack




O is the most common waitlisted blood type

HLA typing

donor and recipient HLA alleles, HLA A B and DR are the most impt




each person has two alleles for each constituting 6 antigens to compare




importance of other antigens increasing especaillay in relationship to antibodies developing late post Tx

PRA

panel reactive antibody




reflected as a percentage which relates to presence of Abs to HLA molecules




the higher the PRA the more sensitized the recipient is ie more like to have rejection

High PRA

pregnancy, blood tranfusions, prior transplant, essentially you are high risk for rejection

Attempts to increase the donor pool

use of organs from expanded donor pool, older age 50-59 pluse two of the collowing creatinine about 1.5 HTN or CVA, non heart beatinf donors




systematic targeted educational campaigns

efficacy of ECD kidneys

should be offered to principally to candidates older than 40 years in OPOs with long wait time




in OPOs with shorter waiting times, in which non ECD kidney transplant availability is higher candidates should be counseled that ECD survival benefit is observed only for patients with beetus

Kidney wait list

Kidney Donor Patient Index KDPI desides who would get the kdiney




variables are age, height, weight, ethnicit, HTN, DM, cause of death, HCV status, DCD status

Why is living donation so much more successful

defies the importance of HLA matchin, testament to new drug therapies, raises the issue of increased Ag presenation in death

Alloantigen dependent mechanisms

HLA matching, acute rejection, ongoging subclinical immune injury which causes B cell and T cell development to trigger atack of endothelium of new kdiney and leads to chronic rejection

Alloantigen independent mechanism

brain death, ichemic injury, inadequate reanl mass, hypertension and hyperlipidemia, drug nephrotoxicity CMV and other infections can exacebate the immune response and cause direct injury to the tissue

Pre transplant eval

target risks for infection, Cv disease, malignancies




includes a comprehensive physical and history as well as serologic studies

Surgical procedue for living donors

open surgery with large incision to flank or laproscopic removal of kidney can be used with good results

Cross matchin

B and T cell cross match




donor lymphocytes are incubated against recipient serum, determines if recipient has circulating Abs to MHC antigens of the donor, can eliminate the chance of hyperacute rejection

Types of rejection

hyperacute, occurs within minutes to hourse of release of clamps




accelerated = occurs within 24 hrs to 4 days after transplant




acute, days to weeks




chronic months to years

hyperacute rejection

irreversible




result of preformed circulating antibodies




very rare is cross match is negatice




results in complement activation and thrombosis, vascular injury, ischemia and graft loss

acceleated acute rejection

occurs within 1-4 days




results of prior sensitixation of the receopient to donor antigets via prior transplant or transfusion




mediated by both cellular and humoral immunity




difficult to treat

acute rejection

90% are cellular mediated 5-10 are humoral




easier to treat




constitutional symptoms present due to cytokine release




pathology; tubulitis, vasculitits and perivascular infiltration

Chronic rejection

months to years




etiology not clearly known but probably multifactorial




late developing donor specific antibodies play a key role

Ab mediated rejection

development of donor specific anti HLA abs following tranplant




against class II antigens




no immunosuppressives approved to treat




less reponsive to antirejection therapy




late AMR is associated wiht lower long term graft survival than early AMR




new therapies on the rise

Immunosuppresion mechanisms

deplete lymphocytes




divery lymphocyte traffic




block lymphocyte response pathways

Common drugs in maintenance

cyclosporine




tacrolimus




prenisone




azathiiprine




mycophenolate




sirolumus




belatocept





Induction of rescue drugs

basiliximab, daclizumab




OKT3




ATGAM and thymglobulin




Campath ih

Current immunosuppresion

corticosteroids, inhiito prpduction of interluekins in lymph traficing, many side effects, withdrawal can lead to rejection

Inhibitors of purine/pyriminde syn

azathiprine




mycophenolate




MMF resulted in less accute rejection than AZA ina randomized trial and may be effective for chronic rejection

Antilymphocyte Abs

bind to lymphoytes and trigger cel death via complement of Fc recepotr mediated lysis




polyclonal are ATGAM




monoclonal OKT3




Anti IL2 receptor abs are dacilizumad and basilizimad

Rapamycin

sirolimus, attachs to TOR on calineurin




decreases the incdience of acute rejection




permiets smaller doses of other drugs




toxititis to other organs

Axioms of immunsuppresion

three effects: immunosuppressive effect ISE, immunodeficient complications IDT and non immune toxicity NIT




NIT is dose limiting




combos are used to increase ISE but no NIT




ISE and IDT are linked and equal




therapeutic index = ISE/NIT

Integrated phamacologic model for immunosuprpresion

patient factors = race, gender, genetic variation, immune funciton, co morbid disease




with significant immune responsiveness to the graft




immunosuppressive therapy, indidivudal drug pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and drug-disease interactions can lead to different lcinical outcomes

P-glyocprotein CYP3A4/5

increased exprssion of the p- glycoprotein results in increased pumping of the drugs into the bile ducts, into the proximal tubule, and into the intestinal lumen resulting in decreased absorption

tolerance-chimerism

tolerance = maintenance of graft with no ongoing immunosuppresion




chimerism - host cells are a mixture of donor and recipient




microchimerism is chimerism can be demonstrated in a very small percent of host cells




more likely to result when donor immune system manipulated prior to tranplant, simultanteous immune cell infection, aggressive early immunosuppresison follow by low dose

Tranplant malignancies

most commmon transplant is kidney and the most common tissue of malignancy orihion is skin then lymphoid

Post transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

PTLD




therapeutic immunosuppression lead to B cell hypertropy and eventual dysplasia will cause symtpoms similar to mono, if mutations occur lymphoma may arrise

Phases of post transplant infection

3 phases, first month, next 6 then after than




first is related to surgery or hospital stay, second month are more severe microbes, late are long lasying infections

CV disease post transplant

3-5 times greater




major causes of morbidity post transplant are hypertension, CV disease, diabetes, osteoporosis




mortality, include coronary artery disease, sepsis, neoplasm

Transplant patietns with CHF

unadjusted long-term survival of renal transplant patients hospitalized for CHF in the Us has improved minimally over the past two decades




one year mortalirty with CHF is 24%




very high risk need evasive action asap



Xenortransplantation

suggested due to the shortage




problems are zoonoses, antigenicity particularly carb ags, xenoreactive natural abs activate complement and coagulation pathways