• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/31

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

31 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
Priority among damages
Expectation damages: Automatic if provable to a reasonable degree of certainty
Reliance damages may be avaiable, unless D can prove the expectation damages are less than reliance damages
Restitution may be available, which may require material breach, but not capped by expectation.
Damages in contract
Expectation
Reliance
Restitution
Expectation
The rightful position is the position P would have occupied if the contract had been perfomed.

Recovering the benefit of the bargain, e.g., any expected profit
No expectation damages in torts.
Expectation
A contract creates rights to which P becomes entitled, and this contractual entitlement is what P loses when D breaches.
Restitution (UCC-2-718)
The buyer, despite his breach, may have restitution of the amount by which his payment exceeds reasonable liquidated damages in the K or 20% of the value of the buyer's
Seller's remedies (2-708(1))
Non-acceptance or repudiation by the Buyer:
KP - MP + Incidental - Expenses saved because of buyer's breach
MP determined at the time and place for tender
Seller's Remedies (2-708(2))
Lost-volum seller
If the remedy under 708(1) is inadequate,
Profit + Incidental
Unlimited supply
Unlimited demand
Seller's Remedies (2-706)
Seller resells the goods and recovers KP - Resale P + Incidental - Expenses saved because of buyer's breach
Seller's Remedies (2-709)
Sue for the Price if the buyer keeps the goods but fails to pay
Seller's Remedies (2-702 and 2-704)
If seller discovers that buyer is insolvent, seller can stop delivery or reclaim the goods.
Reliance damages-limit
If D can prove that P would have lost A as P expected from the performance of the contract, the rule is that the expected loss mut be substracted from any reliance recovery.
Efficient breach
Profitable violations of law shoud be encouraged so long as violators compensate thier victims
Damages for breach of warranty (2-714(2))
FMV of th goods accepted - the value of the goods as warranted.
Danger: warranted performance
Buyer's remedies under UCC
No cover: KP - MP + Consequential + Incidental (2-713)
Cover: KP - the cover price Consequential + Incidental (2-712)

Accepted: Value of goods accepted - Value of goods as warranted (2-715)
Specific performance if the goods are unique or the buyer is otherwise unable to cover. (2-716)
Consequential damages
Buyer may recover consequential damges that the seller had reason to know about at the time of contracting and that the buyer could not reasonably avoid.
Reasonable certainty
Cannot be based on mere speculation and must be proved to a reasonable degree of certainty
Pareto efficiency
Each party better off
Kaldor-Hick efficiency
The parties as a whole better off, even some parties may be worse off

Repeats of Kaldor-Hick often lead to Pareto efficiency (random)
The Coase Theorem
Who is the cheapest cost avoider?
The Coase Theorem
If there is zero transaction cost, then any leagal rule leads to efficient results.
The parties bargains to get an efficient result.
However, diefferent legal rules may result in different distribution of wealth.
Externality
Reciprocal nature of externalities
Compensatory damages force the other party to internalize th damages
Buyer's cover
In good faith and commercially reasa
Seller's resale
In good faith and commercially reasonable manner
Consequential & incidental damages-Special pleading rule
Special damage must be specially pleaded
Buyer's incidental damages
Reasonable expenses incident o the delay or breach
Buyer's consequential damages
The damages that the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise
Injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty
Seller's incidental damages
Commercially reasonable expenses
Consequential damages for failure to pay
Limited to the principal owed plus interest at eh prevailing legal rate.
The case is distinquishable from the instant case.
Mitigation
If P could reasonably mitiage, but did not, then the damages are as if mitigated.
Contract-Cost to completion v. difference in value
You get cost to completion, unless grossly disproporitonal to difference in value
Constract-which market?
The vaule (whole sale) you purchased the goods, not the value you sold (retail)