Relationships

Front 1

Berscheid

Back 1

interdependence theory of emotion

Front 2

Sternberg 1986

Back 2

Triangular theory of love

Front 3

Rusbult & Van Lange 2003

Back 3

Interdependence theory, interaction and relationships.

Front 4

Aron & Aron 1991

Back 4

Self-other overlap: resource, perspective, characteristics

Front 5

Murray, Holmes and Griffin 1996

Back 5

Individuals' impression of their partner were more a mirror of their self-images and ideals than a reflection of their partners' self-reported attributes.

Overall, intimates saw their partners in a more positive light than their partner saw themselves.

These idealized constructions predicted greater satisfaction.

Front 6

Knrick, Groth & Trost 1993

Back 6

1. Compared with women, men were generally less selective in their stated criteria for a one-night stand, and those criteria were less related to their self-rating

2. Differences tend to go away as commitment goes up

Parental investment model: Men are unselective when considering relationships in which their potential investment in offspring is likely to be lower than women's, but they increase their selectivity when their potential investment is comparable with that of women.

Front 7

Birnbaum Reis & Mikulincer 2006

Back 7

1. attachment anxiety was associated with relatively ambivalent construal of sexual experience(high levels of letting go state of mind, attentional focus on their own needs, desire for partner's emotional involvement, but at the same time, they also have relatively strong aversive feelings during sexual intercourse as well as doubts about being loved), whereas attachment avoidance was associated with more aversive sexual feelings and cognitions

2. attachment anxiety amplified the effects of positive and negative sexual experiences on relationship interactions. Attachment avoidance inhibited the effects of sexual experiences on daily relationship interaction.

Front 8

Baumeister & Leary 1995

Back 8

Need to Belong

Front 9

Hazan and Shaver 1987

Back 9

1.Same percentage of different types of attachment across infants and adults (secure 56%, avoidant 23%, anxious 20%).
2. lover experience difference
3. working models of self and relationship are different
4. attachment history difference
5. difference in reported trait loneliness

Front 10

Eastwick & Finkel 2006

Back 10

participants exhibited tranditional sex difference when stating the importance of physical attractiveness and earning prospects in an ideal partner and ideal speed date

data revealed no sex differences in the associations between participants' romantic interest in real-life potential partners

participants' ideal preferences, assessed before the speed-dating event, failed to predict what inspired their actual desire at the event.