Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
7 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Pinto Case Physical Design (CH3)
|
-rear gas tank without sufficient buffer against bolts
-current design satisfied existing standards -Insufficient buffer caused injuries and death |
|
|
Pinto Case Personal Choices (CH3)
|
-some engineers suggested design change, and it was rejected
-Ford knew Pinto wouldn't be up to standards -Ford decided not to recall Pinto for a year because of expense -Ford was sued and assessed largest damages to date |
|
|
Pinto Case Overall Point (CH3)
|
-Chose satisfying regulations insufficient for avoiding liability
|
|
|
OSHA Case Physical Design (CH3)
|
-wanted to reduce PPM levelas of benzene exposure from 10 ppms to 1 ppm for workers/citizens
|
|
|
OSHA Case Personal Choices (CH3)
|
-SCOTUS rules in sufficient evidence for reduction and costly for businesses
-Burden of proof is placed on OSHA to show unsafety rather than businesses to prove safety |
|
|
Contentious Case (CH3)
|
disagreement might not be due to difrferent ethical standards but rather due to the facts
|
|
|
OSHA Case Overall Point (CH3)
|
-contentious cases can interpret facts differently and cause organizations/businesses to disagree on the facts
|
