• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
APA ethics code general principles
Beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, respoect for people's rights and dignity (APA, 2002)
Beneficence and nonmaleficence
Benefit those with whom they work, do no harm (APA, 2002)
Fidelity and responsibility
Establish relationships of trust (APA, 2002)
Integrity
Promote accuracy, honesty, and truthfulness (APA, 2002)
Justice
Entitle all persons access to and benefit from contributions of psychology (APA, 2002)
Respect for people’s rights and dignity
Respect the dignity and worth of all people, and the rights of individuals to privacy, confidentiality, and self- determination (APA, 2002)
Belmont report basic principles
Respect for persons, beneficence, justice
Coercion
Overt threat of harm intentionally presented to obtain compliance (Belmont report)
Undue influence
Offer of excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward to obtain compliance (Belmont report)
Value neutral
The interventionist starts with the assumption that he or she has certain values, but attempts are made to keep these from interfering in the intervention process. (Snow et al., 2000)
Value advocate
A clear value orientation is adopted and efforts are made to reduce the options acceptable to the recipient (Snow et al., 2000)
Ethics in community psych cite
Snow et al., 2000
Responsible to whom? Responsible for what?
O'Neil, 1989
Case studies in ethics in community psych
O'Neil, 1989
2 solutions to tension between client and society
Do what client wants, serve interests of vulnerable (O'Neil, 1989)
IRB history cite
Edgar & Rothman, 1995
Central charges of IRB
Review whether benefits outweigh risks, make sure investigators have explained all relevant issues to secure informed consent (Edgar & Rothman, 1995)