Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
56 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
social research paradigm
|
a perspective; not a "right" or "wrong" paradigm
|
|
who argued sociology is a science
|
thomas kuhn
|
|
studying head shapes in the 1800s bc believed it influenced the brain was called what?
|
phrenology
|
|
what is positivism research?
|
focus making scientific; goal is to measure
|
|
positives of positivism research?
negatives? |
+numerical
-how well can measure abstract things? black & white |
|
what is naturalism research?
|
studying people in their natural habitat
|
|
positives of naturalism research?
negatives? |
+more accurate; has rich data
-time consuming; hawthorne effect |
|
what is social constructivism research?
|
reconstructing reality to understand
|
|
positives of social constructivism research?
negatives? |
+acknowledges change over time
-interpreting things? |
|
what is critical/feminist research?
|
power of an inequal group
|
|
positives of critical/feminist research?
negatives? |
+new perspectives
-biased; limited |
|
what is postmodernism research?
|
focus on the complexity of society
|
|
positives of postmodernism research?
negatives? |
+inclusive; gets to grey areas
-how conclude with so much info? |
|
quantitative research is-
|
empirical data; relationships/variables; makes generalizations by watching patterns, trends, change
|
|
3 common sampling ways in quantitative research:
|
-simple random
-systematic -stratified random |
|
types of quantitative research methods
|
-experiments
-surveys -secondary data |
|
surveys in quant. methods are
|
"nomethetic" has breadth over depth
|
|
strengths of quant. research
|
-can give stats/numbers
-reliability -can generalize |
|
weaknesses of quant. research
|
-validity (measuring what we think we are measuring?)
|
|
quaLitative research is-
|
focused on in-depth over breadth (called ideographic)
|
|
convenience of quaL. samples
|
-smaller
-convenient -purposeful -snowball effect -trying to reach quota |
|
methods in quaL. research-
|
-in-depth interview
-focus groups -observation & ethnography -content analysis |
|
who said everything is either a 1 or a 0 in quaL. methods
|
kerlinger
|
|
appropriate quaL. research question
|
-unbiased
-"so what?" why would sociologists care -looking at question in a nonjudgemental scientific way |
|
historical ethics case in Nazi Germany
|
-tested on jews; broke law that participants should be voluntary
|
|
nazi germany led to rise of?
|
AMA code of ethics 1966
|
|
historical ethics case- tyskegee syphilis study
|
1932-1972
-studied low-income blacks w/ syphilis for 40 years, said was giving free medicine to treat them in exchange but was not |
|
recent ethics case- harvard & yale "report card"
|
looking at how schools were connected w/ large companies (ex. drug companies supporting school medical programs to promote their drug-causing conflict of interest)
|
|
most ethical models are based on-
|
medical research
|
|
protected classes from being research participants
|
-prisoners
-pregnant women -children -mentally & physically handicapped |
|
using someone that you know as a research participant is-
|
conflict of interest
|
|
power relations between researchers & participants
|
researchers have power over participant by:
-holding confidentiality of identity -having credibility to get pll to participate -we interpret the research we collect |
|
the sociological imagination
|
a way of looking at the world that allows the bearer to recognize how the social affects the personal, how history affects biography
|
|
defining sociology
|
-society
-culture -norms/values -groups -stratification |
|
goals of sociologists?
|
-stratification
-interaction -inequality -impact contributors -institutions -patterns |
|
what is social research?
|
science --a specific & systematic way of understanding how social realities arise, operate, and impact individuals & groups of individuals
|
|
how social research is different from other sciences?
|
-cant put society in a lab
-difficulties in measuring qual/quant research |
|
deductive vs. inductive research
|
deductive- start with question
inductive- start with research; look at patterns in data |
|
how does social research relate to the sociological imagination?
|
acknowledging that there are numerous forces working on us outside of ourselves
|
|
the point of social research in relations to the sociological imagination?
|
we must be able to link personal troubles to public issues
|
|
3 basic parts of social research
|
1) theory/ontology (framework
2) epistemology (questions) 3) methodology (analysis) |
|
why conduct social research?
|
-persuade people
-explain patterns -predict future -change |
|
3 major types of social research
|
1) basic or academic
2) applied (organization) 3) activist/public |
|
scientific misconduct
|
fixing the numbers, saying there's correlations when there's not, etc.
|
|
issues of harm in social research
|
-physical
-social -emotional/psychological -legal -financial |
|
institutional review board (IRB)
|
made ethical rules/guidelines; someone outside (usually in the community) judges a study to see if it's ethical
|
|
IRB consent forms remind participants-
|
-voluntary
-risks -what research is about -how confidentiality is handled -participant can end at any time |
|
ethical problems with paying participants
|
-are they relying on the money for financial reasons?
-can they say no? (because the $) -how much $ is too much? |
|
laud humphrey's tearoom trade
|
studied male-male sexual encounters in bathrooms, then tracked addresses by license plate numbers & interviewed them at home
|
|
ethic issues with humphrey's tearoom trade study?
|
-did not get subjects consent
-acted under false pretense |
|
a literature review is-
|
a review of peer-reviewed journal articles that cover what other researchers have found about your research topic and research question.
|
|
main goal to a literature review is-
|
ORGANIZE and INTEGRATE the material and present it in a clear way
|
|
a good literature review discusses previous research and-
|
-its major findings
-its conceptualization of your topic -its use of soci. theories -disagreements that exist -shortcomings that exist |
|
major parts of research papers
|
-intro
-literature review -methodology -discussion -conclusion |
|
parts of the proposal of a research paper
|
-intro (question, so what)
-lit review (maj. findings) -methodology (how will you answer q?) |
|
quaL. vs quanT. research
|
qual is depth/breadth
quant is breadth/depth |