• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/15

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

15 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Dicta in support of Dicey
Lee v Bude & Torrington Railway

Duport Ltd. v Sirs
EU law prevails even over constitutional law
Internationale handelgesellshaft
Interpretation Approach
Lord Denning in McCarthys v Smith
Garland v British Rail
Lister v Forth Dry Dock
HRA interpretation: Lord Hoffman
Simms Lord Hoffamn "Even the most general words"
Art 6 Cases
R v A - right to examine witness conflicted with Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act

Lambert - Presumption of innocent conflicts with Misuse of Drugs Act 1971
Academic Critiques of interpretation
R v A
Klug: Turns the will of parliament on its head

Nicol: Usurp
Both prefer DoI's
Judicial comment interpretation in Ghaidan
Lord Nichols in Ghaidan "may require departure from parliament's intention but shouldn't read into acts words which aren't there"
DoI's Case
Bellinger v Bellinger - post-op sex change problems with Matrimonial Clauses Act prompts Gender Recognition Act
DoI's are strike downs in effect
Kavanagh
Judicial Defence of HRA and PS
Lord Woolf in Donoghue v Poplar Housing - "only interpret not legislate"
HRA interpretation preferred
Lord Steyn in R v A "DoI's last restort"
But then Lord Hope's dissent approach preferred
Re: S & Ors: Re W & Ors: Re W & B (Children)
Gay rent act case
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza - DoI last Resort, "stained language"

Men & Woman = couple
s10
short-cirits parmiantary sercunity
Stats on DoI
19 DoI
11 primary legislation in response
3 fast tracked
4 remedied before DoI made