• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/124

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

124 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Abstract

summary of research - outlines aim, method, hypothesis, participants, results, conclusions




Presented at start

Alternate Hypothesis

prediction that there will be an effect of IV on DV




or that variables are related in a correlation

Appendices

end of paper




list of materials, calculations, raw data

Biased sample

sample not representative of target pop or of people in general

Biopsychosocial

explains health in terms of psychological, social + physical causes

Case study

small group of people studied in depth (usually p's are unusual in some way)

Castration Complex

part of Oedipus complex: a boys fear of losing his penis after seeing a naked female for the first time

Ceiling effect

a point where p's cannot achieve a higher score even if they have the capability to do so

Coding frames

groups of classifications to show how qualitative data can be turned into quantitative data

Classical conditioning

people learn to associate two stimuli

Concurrent Validity

test validated against existing measure

Conditions

situation under which experiment is taken

Confidentiality

to protect privacy by not associating names with responses

Consent

ethical requirement




p's agree to take part

Construct validity

study measures actual behaviour it sets out to measure

Controlled observation

controls all factors that may alter behaviour




eliminates extraneous variables

Counterbalancing

to reduce order effects in repeated measures design




systematically changing order of presentation of tasks to p

Covert observation

p's observed without their knowledge

Criterion validity

How much one measure predicts another

Cross-sectional study

data collected at specific time but from people of diff ages




Snapshot with some benefits of longitudinal

Normal distribution curve

symmetrical bell shaped curve




most scores around midpoint

Debrief

discussion following investigation so p not affected by experiment

Deception

p's tricked into believing study is investigating something other than what it is

Deductive

Primary goal is testing theories.




Theory --> hypothesis --> Observation

Demand characteristics

p's change behaviour as they guess studies aims

Deterministic

behaviour determined by factors beyond control

Discussion

research paper




What the study discovered, evaluation, alternative explanations, suggestions for improvements

Double-blind

p's ad researcher unaware of p's condition or aims of study

Ecological validity

research is true to life

Event sampling

event recorded each time it happens

Experiment

test undertaken in controlled conditions to investigate IV's effect on DV

External reliability

extent to which test score varies from one time to another

External validity

research generalised to other settings

Extraneous variables

undesirable variables that may affect relationship between IV and DV

Face validity

measures what aims to measure and tests what it aims to test





falsifiability

to prove wrong

field experiments

occur in natural settings/ environment to those being studied

Free will

acting according to choice

Frontal lobes

areas of brain responsible for higher order functions




thinking, planning, forming ideas

Generalise

apply findings to broader population

Holistic

parts of a whole considered interrelated so a whole is more than just a sum of its parts

Hypothesis

research prediction based of theory or observation

Independent measures design

p's randomly allocated to condition

Independent variable

manipulated variable to see affect on DV

Individual differences

variations between people

Inductive

primary goal is generating new theories




Observation --> hypothesis --> theory

Internal reliability

consistency of results of test across items within a test

Internal validity

extraneous variables controlled



effect of IV on DV measured

Inter-rater reliability

observers consistently rete/ observe behaviour and are correlated




to avoid subjectivity

Interval level data

data with equal intervals but has no true zero

Introduction

at beginning of paper




psychological area, where located, focuses of previous research in psychological area

Laboratory experiment

in controlled setting

Level of significance

level at which null hypothesis rejected

Likert scale

range of answers to select

Longitudinal study

collection of data over a long period of time

Matched pairs design

p's allocated to position based of characteristics so both conditions have similar people

Measure of central tendency

calculating central, average, typical scores

measure of dispersion

how speed out the data is

Method

research paper




details for someone to carry out exact procedure in same conditions

Naturalistic observation

carried out in field/ natural setting

Nominal level data

categories of behaviour and how often they occur

Non- participant observation

observer not member of group being studied

Null hypothesis

prediction that there will be no effect of IV on DV

Nurture

features affected by circumstances

Objective

not influenced by personal opinion

Oedipus complex

term developed by freud




incestuous feelings of a son towards his mother and jealousy of his father

One tailed hypothesis

directional




specific effect predicted

two tailed hypothesis

non- directional




effect predicted but not specified

Operant conditioning

behaviour will be repeated if rewarded

Operationalised

concept being investigated made measurable

Opportunity sample

p'selected due to availability

Order effects

order of tasks carried out will affect results

ordinal level data

individual data




shows which p did most or least and shows position of p in group

overt observation

p's aware they are being observed

participant observation

observers part of or pretending to be part of group being observed

population validity

how accurately sample represents target population

positively skewed curve

data has more low scores than high

predictive validity

test or research can predict certain behaviors

Procedure

how p's approached, what was said, timings, and what actually happened

qualitative data

data in the form of words

quantitative data

data in the form of numbers

Quasi experiment

IV is naturally occurring

Random sample

everyone form target population has equal chance of being selected

Randomisation

p's allocated condition based on chance

Rating scales

set of values allowing feelings to be rated

Ratio level data

data with equal intervals and true zero

Raw data

data collected for each participant

Reductionist

behaviour explained by breaking it down into its constituent parts

Related design

each score on experimental condition compared to corresponding score in control condition

Reliability

consistency of research or findings

Repeated measures design

all p's in all conditions

Replicable

research could be repeated by following same procedure

researcher/ observer effects

effects on p's that are brought about by researcher's presence

results

research paper




raw data, summaries, statistics

Self report

p's provide data about themselves

Semantic differential scale

rate something between two opposite descriptive words

Semi-structured interview

interviewer has list of questions but can ask for clarification

Single blind

p's don't know the condition or aims

Snapshot study

data collected at specific point in time

Social desirability bias

p's try to present image of themselves more positively

split half method

measure of reliability




on, then another half of q's tested to ensure same score

Socially sensitive

may be social implications for p's or group represented

standard deviation

measure of dispersion




square root of variance

standardisation

keeping test conditions the same for each p

structured interview

same set of q's in same order for each p

structured observation

researcher imposes structure to meet aim

Subjective

influenced by personal opinions/ feelings

Systematic bias

tendency of an experiment to support particular outcomes

Test retest method

testing external reliability




to see if same results if sample retested

Time event sampling

fixed period of time is set for observation

time point sampling

Observer records what p doing at fixed intervals

type 1 error

mistakenly accepting alternate hypothesis when the null hypnosis is correct

type 2 error

mistakenly accepting null hypothesis when alternate is correct

Unfalsifiable

imposible to prove wrong

Unrelated design

whole experimental condition's scores compared with whole control conditions scores from different group of p's

Unstructured interview

interviewers ask spontaneous q's

unstructured observation

researchers continuously record everything that happens

Validity

how accurate a piece of research of test is at measuring what it aims to measure

Variance

measure of dispersion




records how much a set of numbers is spread out from the mean

Test for nominal level data and independent design

Chi squared test

Test for nominal level data and repeated measures design

Binomial Sign test

Test for ordinal level data and independent measures design

Mann-Whitney U test

Test for ordinal level data and repeated measures design

Wilcoxon signed ranks test

Test for ordinal level data and correlation

Spearman's Rho Correlation Coefficient