Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
124 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Abstract |
summary of research - outlines aim, method, hypothesis, participants, results, conclusions Presented at start |
|
Alternate Hypothesis |
prediction that there will be an effect of IV on DV or that variables are related in a correlation |
|
Appendices |
end of paper list of materials, calculations, raw data |
|
Biased sample |
sample not representative of target pop or of people in general |
|
Biopsychosocial |
explains health in terms of psychological, social + physical causes |
|
Case study |
small group of people studied in depth (usually p's are unusual in some way) |
|
Castration Complex |
part of Oedipus complex: a boys fear of losing his penis after seeing a naked female for the first time |
|
Ceiling effect |
a point where p's cannot achieve a higher score even if they have the capability to do so |
|
Coding frames |
groups of classifications to show how qualitative data can be turned into quantitative data |
|
Classical conditioning |
people learn to associate two stimuli |
|
Concurrent Validity |
test validated against existing measure |
|
Conditions |
situation under which experiment is taken |
|
Confidentiality |
to protect privacy by not associating names with responses |
|
Consent |
ethical requirement p's agree to take part |
|
Construct validity |
study measures actual behaviour it sets out to measure |
|
Controlled observation |
controls all factors that may alter behaviour eliminates extraneous variables |
|
Counterbalancing |
to reduce order effects in repeated measures design systematically changing order of presentation of tasks to p |
|
Covert observation |
p's observed without their knowledge |
|
Criterion validity |
How much one measure predicts another |
|
Cross-sectional study |
data collected at specific time but from people of diff ages Snapshot with some benefits of longitudinal |
|
Normal distribution curve |
symmetrical bell shaped curve most scores around midpoint |
|
Debrief |
discussion following investigation so p not affected by experiment |
|
Deception |
p's tricked into believing study is investigating something other than what it is |
|
Deductive |
Primary goal is testing theories. Theory --> hypothesis --> Observation |
|
Demand characteristics |
p's change behaviour as they guess studies aims |
|
Deterministic |
behaviour determined by factors beyond control |
|
Discussion |
research paper What the study discovered, evaluation, alternative explanations, suggestions for improvements |
|
Double-blind |
p's ad researcher unaware of p's condition or aims of study |
|
Ecological validity |
research is true to life |
|
Event sampling |
event recorded each time it happens |
|
Experiment |
test undertaken in controlled conditions to investigate IV's effect on DV |
|
External reliability |
extent to which test score varies from one time to another |
|
External validity |
research generalised to other settings |
|
Extraneous variables |
undesirable variables that may affect relationship between IV and DV |
|
Face validity |
measures what aims to measure and tests what it aims to test |
|
falsifiability |
to prove wrong |
|
field experiments |
occur in natural settings/ environment to those being studied |
|
Free will |
acting according to choice |
|
Frontal lobes |
areas of brain responsible for higher order functions thinking, planning, forming ideas |
|
Generalise |
apply findings to broader population |
|
Holistic |
parts of a whole considered interrelated so a whole is more than just a sum of its parts |
|
Hypothesis |
research prediction based of theory or observation |
|
Independent measures design |
p's randomly allocated to condition |
|
Independent variable |
manipulated variable to see affect on DV |
|
Individual differences |
variations between people |
|
Inductive |
primary goal is generating new theories Observation --> hypothesis --> theory |
|
Internal reliability |
consistency of results of test across items within a test |
|
Internal validity |
extraneous variables controlled
effect of IV on DV measured |
|
Inter-rater reliability |
observers consistently rete/ observe behaviour and are correlated to avoid subjectivity |
|
Interval level data |
data with equal intervals but has no true zero |
|
Introduction |
at beginning of paper psychological area, where located, focuses of previous research in psychological area |
|
Laboratory experiment |
in controlled setting |
|
Level of significance |
level at which null hypothesis rejected |
|
Likert scale |
range of answers to select |
|
Longitudinal study |
collection of data over a long period of time |
|
Matched pairs design |
p's allocated to position based of characteristics so both conditions have similar people |
|
Measure of central tendency |
calculating central, average, typical scores |
|
measure of dispersion |
how speed out the data is |
|
Method |
research paper details for someone to carry out exact procedure in same conditions |
|
Naturalistic observation |
carried out in field/ natural setting |
|
Nominal level data |
categories of behaviour and how often they occur |
|
Non- participant observation |
observer not member of group being studied |
|
Null hypothesis |
prediction that there will be no effect of IV on DV |
|
Nurture |
features affected by circumstances |
|
Objective |
not influenced by personal opinion |
|
Oedipus complex |
term developed by freud incestuous feelings of a son towards his mother and jealousy of his father |
|
One tailed hypothesis |
directional specific effect predicted |
|
two tailed hypothesis |
non- directional effect predicted but not specified |
|
Operant conditioning |
behaviour will be repeated if rewarded |
|
Operationalised |
concept being investigated made measurable |
|
Opportunity sample |
p'selected due to availability |
|
Order effects |
order of tasks carried out will affect results |
|
ordinal level data |
individual data shows which p did most or least and shows position of p in group |
|
overt observation |
p's aware they are being observed |
|
participant observation |
observers part of or pretending to be part of group being observed |
|
population validity |
how accurately sample represents target population |
|
positively skewed curve |
data has more low scores than high |
|
predictive validity |
test or research can predict certain behaviors |
|
Procedure |
how p's approached, what was said, timings, and what actually happened |
|
qualitative data |
data in the form of words |
|
quantitative data |
data in the form of numbers |
|
Quasi experiment |
IV is naturally occurring |
|
Random sample |
everyone form target population has equal chance of being selected |
|
Randomisation |
p's allocated condition based on chance |
|
Rating scales |
set of values allowing feelings to be rated |
|
Ratio level data |
data with equal intervals and true zero |
|
Raw data |
data collected for each participant |
|
Reductionist |
behaviour explained by breaking it down into its constituent parts |
|
Related design |
each score on experimental condition compared to corresponding score in control condition |
|
Reliability |
consistency of research or findings |
|
Repeated measures design |
all p's in all conditions |
|
Replicable |
research could be repeated by following same procedure |
|
researcher/ observer effects |
effects on p's that are brought about by researcher's presence |
|
results |
research paper raw data, summaries, statistics |
|
Self report |
p's provide data about themselves |
|
Semantic differential scale |
rate something between two opposite descriptive words |
|
Semi-structured interview |
interviewer has list of questions but can ask for clarification |
|
Single blind |
p's don't know the condition or aims |
|
Snapshot study |
data collected at specific point in time |
|
Social desirability bias |
p's try to present image of themselves more positively |
|
split half method |
measure of reliability on, then another half of q's tested to ensure same score |
|
Socially sensitive |
may be social implications for p's or group represented |
|
standard deviation |
measure of dispersion square root of variance |
|
standardisation |
keeping test conditions the same for each p |
|
structured interview |
same set of q's in same order for each p |
|
structured observation |
researcher imposes structure to meet aim |
|
Subjective |
influenced by personal opinions/ feelings |
|
Systematic bias |
tendency of an experiment to support particular outcomes |
|
Test retest method |
testing external reliability to see if same results if sample retested |
|
Time event sampling |
fixed period of time is set for observation |
|
time point sampling |
Observer records what p doing at fixed intervals |
|
type 1 error |
mistakenly accepting alternate hypothesis when the null hypnosis is correct |
|
type 2 error |
mistakenly accepting null hypothesis when alternate is correct |
|
Unfalsifiable |
imposible to prove wrong |
|
Unrelated design |
whole experimental condition's scores compared with whole control conditions scores from different group of p's |
|
Unstructured interview |
interviewers ask spontaneous q's |
|
unstructured observation |
researchers continuously record everything that happens |
|
Validity |
how accurate a piece of research of test is at measuring what it aims to measure |
|
Variance |
measure of dispersion records how much a set of numbers is spread out from the mean |
|
Test for nominal level data and independent design |
Chi squared test |
|
Test for nominal level data and repeated measures design |
Binomial Sign test |
|
Test for ordinal level data and independent measures design |
Mann-Whitney U test |
|
Test for ordinal level data and repeated measures design |
Wilcoxon signed ranks test |
|
Test for ordinal level data and correlation |
Spearman's Rho Correlation Coefficient |