• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/21

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

21 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Psychological Pseudoscience

Set of claims that seem scientific but from confirmation bias and belief perseverance that characterize science

Confirmation Bias

tendency to seek evidence that supports our hypothesis



neglecting or distorting contradicting evidence

Belief perseverance

tendency to stick to our initial beliefs even when we are wrong

Warning Signs for Pseudoscience

exaggerated claims


- over reliance on anecdotes


- absence of link to other research


- lack of peer review


- lack of self-correction


- psychobabble


- "proof" instead of evidence

Apophenia

tendency to perceive meaningful connections amoung unrelated phenomena

Pareidolia

seeing meaningful images in meaningless visual stimuli

Dangers in pseudoscience

opportunity cost: ignore the scientific route


- direct harm


- blocks scientific thinking

Antidote for pseudoscience

think scientifically


- separate science from pseudoscience

Scientific skepticism

a willingness to


- keep an open mind to all claims


- accept claims only after researchers have subjected them to experiments

Critical thinking

skills to evaluate claims open-mindedly carefully


-over coming our biases

6 Principles of Critical Thinking

ruling out hypotheses: alternate explanations should be considered


- correlation vs. causation: can we be sure a causes B


- falsifiability: can this be disproven


- replicability: possible to duplicate findings?


- extraordinary claims: is the evidence as convincing as the claim?


- occam's razor: does a simpler explanation fit the data equally well?

2 Core tenets of science

the universe operates according to certain natural laws


- such laws are discoverable and testable



Scientific theory

an explanation for a large number of findings in the natural world


- a testable prediction is called a hypothesis

The scientific method

see notes

Independent variable

the variable that you manipulate

Dependent variable

the variable that you measure

Averaging

to control for random error, we use averaging


- better estimate of behaviour

Cognitive Biases

systematic errors in thinking that can lead to confidence in false conclusions

Heuristics

mental shortcuts or rules of thumb


- they reduce the cognitive energy required to solve problems


- the trouble is when they oversimplify reality



How do we avid biases and heuristics

test specific hypotheses derived from broader theories


- theories are never "proven" by hypotheses are confirmed of disconfirmed

2 basic types of Research methods

Descriptive: observe and describe behaviour


used to determine the existence of a relationship between the variables




- Experimental: to demonstrate a cause and effect relationships between the variables