Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
31 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
2 ways language is not as straightforward as it seems
|
Complicated sentences can be comprehensible:
“Daddy, what did you bring that book that I don’t want to be read to out of up for?” Simple sentences can be difficult to comprehend: “The horse raced past the barn fell.” “After the musician had played the piano was quickly taken off stage.” |
|
Production
|
speaking and writing
|
|
Comprehension
|
listening and reading
|
|
3 steps involved in speaking
|
Have thought--form sentence--produce sound
|
|
3 steps involved in listening
|
Hear sound--identify words, sentences--comprehend meaning
|
|
Phonemes
|
Smallest unit of speech sound
Around 40 in each language Different phonemes in different languages L vs. R in Japanese Tonal differences (Chinese) Aspirated vs. unaspirated “p” (Thai) clucking sound (Xhosa - South Africa) Rules of order Fpibs not okay Pritos okay Tlitos not okay (but Tl is okay in the Tlingit language) |
|
Morphemes
|
Smallest unit that with a definable meaning or grammatical function
Prefixes, suffixes, roots Can be entire words Language has rules for combining them |
|
Words
|
Combinations of one or more morphemes
specific rules: “lifted” vs. “goed” Adults know several hundred thousand |
|
Phrase
|
organized grouping of words. the building blocks of sentences.
|
|
Syntax
|
rules that determine word order
|
|
Sentence
|
group of phrases conveying meaning
|
|
Semantics (meaning)
|
Related to concepts/categories in LTM
Words symbolize concepts Meanings of sentences – Words must be grouped into phrases – Appropriate meaning assigned not just by words in isolation, but by relationships between words. |
|
Noam Chomsky
|
• Set stage for contemporary study of language.
• Studied how words and phrases translate into meaning. |
|
Phrase structure
|
Way to map the structure of a sentence.
Each word is assigned a role. Rules specify in what order and combinations these roles can occur. |
|
First problem with relying on phrase structure alone
|
Same phrase structure, two meanings:
The shooting of the hunters was terrible. |
|
Second problem with relying on phrase structure alone
|
(2) Two different phrase structures, one meaning
The boy hit the ball (active voice) The ball was hit by the boy. (passive voice) |
|
Surface structure
|
the phrase structure that applies to the order in which the words were actually spoken.
|
|
Deep structure
|
the fundamental, underlying phrase structure that conveys the meaning
|
|
Transformational grammar
|
rules that transform among surface structures having the same deep structure
|
|
Paraphrase
|
Different surface structures with deep structure that conveys the same meaning.
The boy hit the ball The ball was hit by the boy different focus |
|
Ambiguity
|
same wording has more than one meaning.
|
|
Lexical ambiguity
|
word has multiple meanings.
|
|
Syntactic ambiguity
|
same words can be grouped together into more than one phrase structure.
They are cooking apples |
|
Referential ambiguity
|
Same word/phrase can refer to two different things within a sentence.
|
|
Result of semantic priming by Meyer
|
Probes with related primes are verified more rapidly than those with unrelated primes
|
|
Why semantic priming test happened the way it did
|
Concepts are connected to each other in semantic memory
Activation of one concept spreads to closely-related concepts (=“spreading activation”) Presentation of primes activate strongly-linked concepts If a concept is already active when you read the word, you can respond to it more quickly |
|
Lexical access (dumb retrieval or smart retrieval)
|
Dumb retrieval!
All possible meanings of a word are retrieved from the lexicon (mental dictionary); context then guides selection of correct meaning. |
|
Swinney Experiment
|
Listen to a passage of text.
When presented with text on a screen, decide if word or non-word. (lexical decision task) Measure reaction time. Immediately after and delayed lexical decision |
|
Parsing a sentence
|
Understanding a sentence requires parsing
We need to establish the syntactic structure of the sentence, which tells us who did what to whom. |
|
Principle of Minimal Attachment
|
Assume that ambiguous prepositional phrase describes the action (verb) rather than the object of the sentence.
“with binoculars” describes “saw” rather than “the cop” The spy saw the cop, and the spy was using binoculars instead of The spy saw the cop, and the cop had binoculars. |
|
Interactionist approaching (with parsing)
|
All information, both syntactic and semantic, is taken into account simultaneously
Sometimes syntax is ambiguous: The spy saw the man with the binoculars. In some cases, meaning can resolve this ambiguity: The bird saw the man with the binoculars. The knowledge that birds don’t use binoculars prevents the parser from ever considering this grouping |