• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Drinking and self awareness study
*Measure self consciousness, positive or negative feedback, wine tasting
*High SC + negative feedback = drink more
Wicklund carpet samples study
-subjects rate self evaluation in front of a TV w/ cowboy, feed of themselves or no image
-lowest self-evaluations with stream, highest when distracted by cowboy
Diner & Walbom cheating study
*Chance to cheat, one group in front of mirror, one not
*71% continue after the bell w/out mirror vs. 7% with
*importance of social standards
Vallacher & Solodky cheating study
*Test on external attributions (luck) or internal attributions(ability)
*More likely to cheat for internal
*Activation of standards
Duval & Wicklund feedback and waiting
-Positive or Negative test results, told to wait (y = time waiing)
-Wait longer for positive results (8 vs. 5 min.)
-Escaping Self awareness
Theory of Lay Epistemics (3)
1. Need for structure/closure
2. Wish to be right/have validity
3. Wish to come to a specific conclusion
Ford & Kruglanski Donald study
*Test for need for structure
*prime either reckless or adventurous, read ambiguous Donald story
*Higher need for structure > higher prime effect
Erber & Fiske Outcome dependancy
* Meet partner described as creative or uncreative, given ambiguous information
*Either told working with or not (IV)
*IF working with, outcome dependent, pay more attention to ambiguity
motive for specific conclusions vs. closure
desire for conclusion can make early closure (no reason to continue looking) or late closure if not met
Ditto & Lopez Closure study
*Doing task with partner, evaluate results of intelligence test
*Told he was a dick or not (IV)
*Look at 9 results for jerk vs. 6 results for nice guy before choosing
*Importance of early closure
Motivated cognition of self(4)
1. Self consistency - cog. diss.
2. Self-enhancement - self-justification in light of failure
3. Self-presentation - cognitive dissonance even in low choice situations to be consistent with others' impressions
4. Self assessment - desire to see self acccurately
Self perception theory (Bem)
What must my attitude be if I am acting in this way

Inferring one's own opinions
Narcissism and self esteem
narcissists take bigger hit with negative events
Self esteem + punishment study
*self esteem threatened via false feedback on intelligence
*how much punishment should student in barfight get
*IV: John Pride vs. John Proudfoot (native)
*Bigger difference between punishments w/ high defensive SE group
*High defensive SE = orient to threats
Glass slipper effect
*Measure IAT for relationship partner vs. romantic fantasy
*High romantic fantasy association > lower social power orientation
Gergen historical trends
1. Romantic - deep inner self, introspection
2. Modern - abstract reason, beliefs, attitudes etc.
3. Postmodern - socially-constructed reality, awareness of multiple selves
SE and TMT
Bogus positive feedback -> less fear of death