Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
69 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Baseline
|
In a single case design, the subject's behavior during a control period before introduction of the experimental manipulation.
|
|
Cohort
|
Group of people born at the same time and exposed to the same societal events
|
|
Control series design
|
Extension of the interrupted time series quasi-experimental design with a comparison / control group.
|
|
Cross-sectional method
|
Persons of different ages are studied at only one point in time
|
|
Longitudinal method
|
The same persons are observed repeatedly as they grow older; like repeated measures design.
|
|
History effects (Confound)
|
Any outside event that is not part of the manipulation that could be responsible.
|
|
Instrument decay (Confound)
|
A change in the measurement instrument, including human observers, is responsible for the results
|
|
Regression to the mean (Confound)
|
Principle that extreme scores on a variable tend to be closer to the mean after second measurement is made; aka statistical regression
|
|
Testing effects (Confound)
|
Taking a pretest changes behavior without any effect on the IV
|
|
Maturation (Confound)
|
The possibility that any naturally occurring change within the individual is responsible for the results.
|
|
Selection effects/ differences
|
Differences in the subjects in each group in an experimental design; occurs when participants elect which group they are in
|
|
Interrupted time-series design
|
Examines a series of measurements over an extended time period before and after the treatment is introduced.
|
|
Multiple baseline design
|
Observing behavior before and after manipulation under multiple circumstances (across different individuals, behaviors, or settings)
|
|
Nonequivalent control groups design
|
A quasi-experimental design in which nonequivalent groups of subjects participate in the different experimental groups, and there is no pretest.
|
|
Posttest-only design
|
A true experimental design in which the DV (posttest) is measured only once, after manipulation of the IV.
|
|
Pretest-posttest design
|
A true experiment design in which the DV is measured both before (pretest) and after (posttest) manipulation of the IV.
|
|
One group posttest only
|
A quasi-experimental design that has no control group and no pretest comparison
|
|
Program evaluation
|
Research designed to assess procedures (e.g. social reforms) designed to produce certain changes in target population.
|
|
Needs assessment
|
Are there problems to be solved?
|
|
Program theory assessment
|
Will problem be addressed?
|
|
Process evaluation
|
Monitoring
|
|
Outcome evaluation
|
Did program achieve desired outcomes?
|
|
Reversal design
|
Single-case design where treatment is introduced after a baseline period and then withdrawn during a second baseline period; aka "withdrawal" design.
|
|
Sequential method
|
Combination of cross-sectional and longitudinal design to study development research questions.
|
|
|
|
|
Central tendency
|
Single number/ value that describes typical or central score among a set of scores
|
|
Correlation coefficient
|
An index of how strongly two variables are related to eachother
|
|
Criterion variable
|
The variable/score that is predicted based upon an individual's score on another variable (the predictor variable); similar to a DV
|
|
Descriptive statistics
|
Stats that describe the results of a study
|
|
Effect size
|
The extent to which two variables are associated
|
|
Frequency distribution
|
Arrangement of set of scores from lowest to highest that indicates the number of times each score was obtained
|
|
Frequency polygons
|
A graphic display of a frequency distribution in which the freq. of each score is plotted on the vertical axis, with the plotted points connected by straight lines
|
|
Multiple correlation
|
A correlation between one variable and combined set of predictor variables
|
|
Partial correlation
|
Observing a situation wherein the observer takes an active role
|
|
Path analysis
|
Depicts the relationships described in the models and show the “path” of the purported causal influences
|
|
Pie chart
|
Graphic display of data in which frequencies and percentages are represented as "slices" of a pie
|
|
Predictor variable
|
A variable used to make a prediction of an individual's score on another variable (the criterion variable). Conceptually similar to a IV
|
|
Variability
|
The amount of dispersion of scores about some central value
|
|
Regression equation
|
A mathematical equation that allows prediction of one behavior when the score on another variable is known
|
|
Restriction of range
|
Problem when scores on a variable are limited to a small subset of their possible values; makes it more difficult to identify relationships
|
|
Scatterplot
|
Graphic representation of each individual's scores on two variables
|
|
Standard deviation
|
The average deviation of scores from the mean (the square root of the variance)
|
|
Statistical significance
|
Rejection of the null hypothesis when an outcome has a low probability of occurrence (usually .05 or less) if, in fact, the null hypothesis is correct
|
|
Structural equation modeling
|
Statistical techniques that are used to evaluate a proposed set of relationships among variables
|
|
Variance
|
Measure of the variability of scores about a mean
|
|
Alpha level
|
Probability of incorrectly rejecting the null hypothesis used by a researcher to decide whether an outcome is statistically significant
|
|
ANOVA
|
Test to see whether two or more means are significantly different
|
|
Chi-Square Test
|
Used when dealing with nominal scale data and when data consists of frequencies.
|
|
Degrees of freedom
|
The number of observations that are free to vary to produce a known outcome.
|
|
Error variance
|
Random variability in a set of scores that is not the result of the IV
|
|
Inferential statistics
|
Statistics designed to determine whether results based on sample data are generalizable to a population.
|
|
|
|
|
Null hypothesis
|
The hypothesis that variables under investigation are not related and any observed effect is due to random error.
|
|
Power
|
The probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis.
|
|
Alternate hypothesis
|
Part of causal inference; a potential alternative cause of an observed relationship between variables.
|
|
Sampling Distribution
|
Theoretical distribution of the frequency of all possible outcomes of a study conducted with a given sample size.
|
|
Statistical Significance
|
Rejection of the null hypothesis when an outcome has a low probability of occurrence (usually .05 or less) if, in fact, the null hypothesis is correct.
|
|
Systematic Variance
|
Variability in a set of scores that is the result of the independent variable
|
|
Cohen’s d
|
Used when comparing two means. Expresses effect size in terms of SD units.
|
|
Type 1 Error
|
An incorrect decision to reject the null hypothesis when it is true.
|
|
Type 2 Error
|
An incorrect decision to accept the null hypothesis when it is false.
|
|
T-test
|
Test used to compare differences between means.
|
|
Generalizability
|
An interaction generating variable
|
|
Meta analysis
|
Statistical procedures for combining results of studies in order to provide a general assessment of the relationship between variables.
|
|
Conceptual replication
|
A type of replication of research using different procedures for manipulating or measuring the variables.
|
|
Exact replication
|
A type of replication of research using the same procedures for manipulating and measuring the variables that were used in the original research.
|
|
Main effects
|
The direct effect of an independent variable on a dependent variable.
|
|
Interactions
|
Effect of one IV on the DV changes, depending on the level of another IV
|
|
Simple effects
|
In factorial design, the effect of one IV at a particular level of another IV
|