Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
14 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Gregorio Maranon
|
injected ppl with adrenaline without explaining effects; 30% reported feeling emotion
most said felt 'as if' feeling emotion but experience was cold, not typical genuine emotion (dont get emotion when artificially induce visceral change) |
|
|
Schachter's 2 factor theory
|
1.stimulus
2.arousal + cognitive label 3. emotion importance of cognitive interpretation |
|
|
Misattribution of Arousal
|
attribute arousal to wrong source
may attribute arousal to nonemotional source ex. caffeine --> love does not account for specific physiological states associated with some emotions |
|
|
excitation transfer
|
residual physiological arousal caused by 1 event is transferred to new stimulus
how experiences bleed into other experiences ex. climb stairs.. see puppy, cutest thing ever |
|
|
Magna Arnold
|
faulted darwin and james for not explaining how emotions are elicited in first place
|
|
|
emotional perception
|
judgment of how an object of perception affects 1 personally
sense judgments: direct, immediate, nonreflective, nonintellectual, automatic |
|
|
bodily responses
|
appraisals sets in motion physiological responses experienced as sort of unpleasant tension
|
|
|
impulse to action
|
beh that reduces the bodily response tension, offering sense from this internal discomfort
each emotion marked by distinct physiological activity that urges us toward different actions |
|
|
Lazarus
|
cognitive-motivational-appraisal theory
2 levels involved in appraisal level 1= molecular level level 2= molar level appraisal= relational assessment; compare beliefs, desires, intentions with external circumstances |
|
|
Level 1
|
Molecular
individual appraisal components primary appraisal:motivational, does event have personal relevance? consistent with goals? type of ego-involvement? secondary appraisal: coping, anyway to avoid further harm? who deserves blame/credit? future expectations? |
|
|
Level 2
|
molar level
individual level components combine to form relational meaning or theme relational themes based on what situation has to offer for good or bad and what person brings to situation in terms of goals, intentions, memories |
|
|
examples of core relational themes
|
anger: demeaning offense against oneself
fear: overwhelming physical danger guilt: demeaning offense against other sadness: irrevocable loss happiness: progress toward goal |
|
|
Zajonc
|
attack to cognitive approach
says objects can be evaluated without needing cognition at all evaluation/preference as basic affective response |
|
|
7 reasons why zajonc argued affect and cognition are different systems
|
1.affective reactions come first
2.affect is basic 3.affect is inescapable 4.affective judgments are irrevocable 5.affective reactions are difficult to verbalize 6.affective reactions dont need to depend on cognition 7.affective reactions may be free floating |
