Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
20 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
single level 2 factors design
|
IV is either between subjects or within subjects.
may be manipulated or subject variable |
|
|
independent group 1 factor design
|
between subject
iv manipulated equiv groups by random assignment |
|
|
matched groups 1 factor design
|
between subject
iv manipulated equiv groups by matching |
|
|
nonequivalent groups 1 factor design
|
between subject
subject variable not equal groups |
|
|
repeated measures 1 factor design
|
within group
manipulated by def tested once or more than once |
|
|
inter.v
history |
events taking place b/w time of measurements, not related to IV
could be family/friends |
|
|
inter.v
testing |
problems that result from repeated measurement of same person
|
|
|
inter.v
instrumentation |
changes in measuring device during course of exp
|
|
|
inter.v
statistical regression |
participants selected b/c some score/measurement turns out to be extreme
extreme scores change over time |
|
|
inter.v
selection |
participants in one group differ from initially from those in other group
|
|
|
inter.v
mortality |
participants drop out or refuse to take part in exp.
|
|
|
inter.v
selection-maturation interaction |
1 group of participants changes along a given dimension faster than other group
|
|
|
inter.v
diffusion or imitation of treatments |
diffusion: participants communicate w/ each other-->reduces differences among groups
|
|
|
witness
|
helps us understand value, relevance, limitations of new info for research process
|
|
|
Leipzig model
|
Wundt-normal cognitive processes
little differentiation b/w participant and experimenter in terms of expected roles or social status |
|
|
Paris model
|
hypothesis/abnormal psych
clear distinction b/w roles of participant and experimenter; 1 never play role of other greatly influenced American psychological experimentation |
|
|
biased data
personal equation |
=b/c of one's physiological and psychological makeup, there are differences in way observe world.
|
|
|
biased data
interrater reliability |
higher the correlation, the less the ratings represent inconsistent subjective factors of rators
low correlation=better operational def. or researcher training needed |
|
|
crainiometry
|
relationship b/w brain size and intelligence
|
|
|
Burt
|
intentional fraud data with monozygotic twin study
(reported exact same correlations for 3 samples) |
