• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/40

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

40 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Authoritariansim

small group of individuals exercising power


no constitutional responsibility to public


dictates people


Modernization and non-democracies

M -aids in the consolidation of democracy but not in the initial transaction



non democracies are like "junk drawer" - grossly misleading, internal dynamics with wide variety of implications


Civil Society

organized life outside the state

Varieties of non-democracy (personalistic, bureaucratic-authoritarian, theocracy, illiberal/hybrid)

Personalistic- the personality of the dictator is emphasized. Ex: Zaire



Bureaucratic-Authoritarian - the state is controlled more by a group of elites(often military) rather than by a single individual leader



theocracy - state controlled by religious leaders or a state with very strict religious restrictions as its main mode of legitimation



hybrid- neither fully democratic nor fully authoritarian


Ideological versus non-ideological nondemocracies

Ideological: belief system that structures all other kinds of decisions - more durable

Totalitarianism

seeks to transform total fabric of society


-force terror violence: deeply controlling


-involved on every element of citizens lives


Modernization and instability

modernization leads to non-democracies, during process of becoming modern countries are unstable and this creates openings for strong leaders who can institute non-democratic regimes to restore order.

Lipset reversed theories

Emerge: lack sufficient conditions


Endure: poor democracies unlikely to last

Historical institutionalist theories

emphasis on how coalitions among groups or classes shape regimes


Inequality and non-democracy

highly unequal socieites often reinforce nondemocratic rule


-larger gap btwn rich & poor makes democracy more dangerous for the rich

Political and Economic “rents” and nondemocracy

similar to apartment renting - take money and see hardly any effort. - Saudi arabia oil industry gain money when oil is being taken out but doesn't do anything for country

Resource Curse explanations of nondemocracy

Basis of provision of goods and services w/o taxation


no need for modern economy or middle class thwarting modernization

Culture and non-democracy (national culture vs. "only game in town" theory)

National Culture: exisits commonality of beliefs that values have an impact on the politics



"only game in town"-hate our gov system but wouldnt change it any other way.


Coercion versus Legitimacy to generate authority and obedience

coercion is costly - better to somehow convince ppl to follow rules on their own

Coercion/Surveillance

Coersion is control through observation, force, torture, and harrassment


Personality Cults

Promotion of image of leader above mortal qualities


-Extraordinary wisdom and power


- quasi-religious qualitites


- use of media to portray this image


-all failings ascribed to lesser people below him or her

Cooptation (generally)

bringing potential challengers into a dependent relationship


The role of elections in illiberal democracies (especially in terms of coopting citizens)

co-opt citicens to create legitimacy and have them vote for you.


also useful for targeting/punishing citizens who don't vote for you


elections: co-opting the opposition and enhances regime letimiacy and demestically and internationally

Chavez’s maisanta list of enemies

there was a petition to recall president chavez..chavez wins recall vote..petition signers become part of "maisanta" list. those who signed had a decrease in earnings and employment

How the uncertainty of elections is managed in autocracies

electoral fraud and ballot stuffing


campaigning advantages


manipulation of electoral laws


high barriers to entry and control over candidate selection

Illiberal democracies as mixing elections and authoritarianism

the liberal elements of individual rights and the rule of law are absent


Democratic mechansisms exist but weakly instituionalized

Features of illiberal democracies (executive power, politicization of state institutions)

Executives tend to hold tremendous power dominates over legislature and judiciary



Politicized: adopts a particular view and adopts the agenda - politicization of state institutions and media: biased towards people who didnt vote for a specific person

Rule of Law (avoidance and selective enforcement)

Selective avoidance: regime insiders above the law



Selective enforcement: "for my friends anything, for my enemies, the law"

Constitutionalism in illiberal democracies

limited government

Collective Action theories

collective action: action undertaken by individuals or a group to pursue things such as civil rights

Presence of illiberal democracies globally

half of all democratizing countries and one quarter of all countries


Consequences of illiberal democracies (elected autocrats and unchecked majority versions)

elected autocrats: subversion of democratic institutions means leaders dont fear the ballot box



unchecked majorites: illberal regimes witness erosion of minority rights, religious/ethnic intolerance


-mobilizing along ethnic, religious lines often a winning strategy for parties in new democracies

The “democratic peace” and illiberal democracies

-Justification for democracy


-democracies almost never fight wars with other democracies.


-peaceful effect is driven by liberal qualities - rule of law, etc.

Yeltsin as the first popular autocrat

gave russia elections


fired regional governors


undercut courts


weakened the legislative branch

Vladimir Putin and Russia’s illiberal democracy

putin was elected by yeltsin and was handed power



Dual-executive system and Putin’s term limits

Dual-executive system: System of president and prime minister which allows putin to assume prime minister and thus become president after



Putin was elected a third term but it was non-consecutive so it didn't go against the two consecutive term limit

Tsarism and the authoritarian tradition in Russia

tsarism - extreme concentration of power in one person



legacy of authoritarian rule limited to pro-democratic developments

“Democratization Backwards” as an explanation of illiberal democracy

essential preconditions for modernization didn't exist



liberalism and democracy didnt evolve otgether



-russia quickly level of participation without liberalism

Importance of question on how China should modernize

two view points: nationalist party-imitate western powers. Communist party view-anti nationalist

Nationalist party

Imitate western powers in terms of modernization

CCP (Chinese Communist Party)

anti nationalist

Mao Zedong

periods of revolutionary change and embrace of communist economic development


- most programs were unsuccesful. led to famine and stagnation in economic development


- his successors reversed course and led to economic reform

Parallel organization of Chinese politics

-duplication of agencies within the state and party

Direction of power/accountability in Chinese politics

power flows from the top down

China and the prospects for democracy (for and against)

For: elites and corruption are targets of citizen anger, generational change in the CCP and more pragmatic, village level elections for local positions



Against: remarkable insitutionalized system of rule, co-optation of citizens