• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Duke Lacrosse Case
falso accusation of rape
disbarment of lead prosecutor Mike Nifong
dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation
found guilty of criminal contempt
in re gault 1967
right to counsel extended to juveniles
juveniles have adult rights
argersinger v hamlin 1972
scott v illinois 1979
accused cannot be subjected to actual imprisonment unless provided with counsel (non felony cases)

illinois had violated the constitution by not providing counsel
Mempa v Rhay 1967
the rights of the defendant may be affected in the critical stages.
must be appointed a counsel even if labeled a revocation of probation or deferred sentencing
brewer v williams
rothgery v gillespie county
one judicial proceedings begin (the adversary process) the suspect has right to counsel.
Williams was convinced by officer to give directions of the body. an interrogation that violates williams right to counsel

initial appearance (learns charges) marks the initiation of adversary proceedings
miranda v arizona 1966
custodial interrogations
police violated right to remain silent and right to legal counsel. evidence was obtained illegally

police must warn a suspect prior to any questioning that they have a right to remain silent....
US v Wade
Kirby v Illinois
police lineups
criminal defendant has a 6th amendment right to counsel at a lineup held after indictment

pre-indictment showup without counsel was not a violation because the criminal prosecution had not yet begun
Strickland V Washington 1984
ineffective assistance of counsel
criminal defendant cannot obtain relief unless he can show that counsel's performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that it affecting the sentencing.
Faretta V. California 1975
defendants have constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves
must show judge the ability to conduct the trial