• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Restrictive covenants: definition
Equity rights

An obligation that I undertake in your favor: touches and concerns my land, touches and concerns your land, operates in a negative way
Elliston v Reacher
Building scheme assumes 1 + 2 are met
Pub & Brewery CO.
Issue of dominant land
-->business purposes
--> ultimately no
Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Benefit Building Society
Can split up covenant into right in rem and right in personam

Illusory? Commonhold addresses concerns to some extent
Creation
Normall express, e.g. reflects in price ad hoc
Conferral on 3rd party
1. Own both: create restrictive covenant in favour of other.
2. Sell A. A has no covenant in favour of B.
3. Sell B. B has covenant in favour of A.

Shown: documentation, surrounding circumstances, building scheme
Effectiveness against disponess
Binding if registerd
No overring interest

A eneteres covenent with B
A transferts land it benefits to C
C acquires rights if:
1. original annexted covenant to land
2. A assigned covenant to C
3. Building scheme
Annexation
Express, upon conferral
Rogers v Hosegood
Statutory annexation occurs whenever agreement meets conditions for statutory covenants
Assignment
Hardly ever occurs, when stat. annexation does not apply.

Only remains enforceable if transfer continues upon each transfer of dom. land