Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
14 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
Stennet v Hancock |
Part of a wheel came off after being fixed earlier that day. Wheel shouldn't have broken and negligence was involved. |
|
|
|
Fisher v Harrods |
Perfume bottles exploding injuring customer, harrods didn't investigate into this. The reasonable manufacturers would investigate defective products |
|
|
|
Grant v Australia knitting mills |
Sulphites were found within underpants The reasonable manufacturer wouldn't allow delicates to come into contact with sulphites |
Itchy underpants |
|
|
Kubach v Hollands |
Failed to pass the warning from the manufacturer to the buyer Only the seller is in breach as manufacturer supplied correct warnings |
Untested chemicals exploded |
|
|
Evans v Triplex Safety Glass |
A year after fitting the windscreen shattered. Manufacturer isn't the clear cause of defect so can't be liable |
Windscreen |
|
|
Miurhead v Industrial Tanks |
Tank failed to supply lobsters with oxygen and killed a consignment Lobsters could be claimed for but not item itself |
Lobsters |
|
|
Aswan Engineering v Lupdine |
Waterproofing compound was left in the sun and the containers melted leaving the compound to fall into the harbour Unforeseeable outcomes cannot be claimed for |
Waterproofing compound |
|
|
Griffiths v Arch Engineering |
Wrongful use of machine caused the injury Not company's fault as should he use it properly there would be no injury |
Two handed drill |
|
|
Abouzaid v Mothercare |
A strap injured a baby within a pram There is no requirement for fault on behalf of d under cpa Defence not available as it could've easily been found |
Baby |
|
|
A v National Blood Authority |
Hepatitis contaminated blood. Knew the defect was there could couldn't identify the batch source, defence not available as they were aware |
Hepatitis contaminated blood |
|
|
Richardson v LPC |
Condom split caused conception wanted to sue for the raising of a child. Product was to expected safety standards |
Condom split |
|
|
Bogle V McDonald's |
Hot drinks scolding children |
|
|
|
Bogle V McDonald's |
Hot drinks scolding children |
|
|
|
Worley v Tambrands |
Tampon caused toxic shock syndrome |
|
