• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
P Control affects time constant and damping coefficient of a second order process by
Kc is indirectly proportional to both.
As Kc is increased, both decrease.
No lag from PI controller results from
Excess P action. Too aggressive , Kc should be reduced. Results in faster response of closed loop process
Maximum controller output occurs at _________, corresponding to ____-____ (___-___)
Max output occurs at max deviation from set point, which corresponds to zero-lag (in-phase)
Lag from PI controller results from
Too much integral action, tI too small. Increase reset time. Offset elimination is slow.
ITSE
Integral Time Square Error. Penalizes both late deviations and large deviations
ITSE equation
t[ysp(t) - ys(t)]^2 dt
Error squared weights for large deviations.
t accounts for late deviations
ITAE
Integral Time Absolute Error penalizes late deviations. t accounts for late deviations
Characteristic Eqn for 1st order process with PI control
Kc[1+ 1/tIs]*Kp/tPs +1 = 0
IAE
Integral of Absolute Error. Any error is a problem, suppress ALL
ysp(t) - ys(t)] dt
ISE
Integral Square Error
Larger deviations/errors penalized, weight by squaring for specific error.
Field Tuning Procedure used for ______.
Based on ________
fast responding loops.
Based on trial and error selection of tuning parameters
Field Tuning Procedure
1. Set D and I off
0 and infinity

2. Use initial estimate of Kc
(e.g. 1/2Kp) estimating Kp
from process knowledge

3. Using SP changes, increase
Kc incrementally until
response meets tuning
criteria

4. For PI controller, decrease
Kc by 10%

5. Use initial value of tI
(e.g. tI = 5tP)

6. Decrease tI until offset is
eliminated and tuning
criteria met for SP changes

7. Check P and I action levels
ATV method: Ku =
4(h)/pi(a)
where h = relay height
a = resulting amplitude of standing wave
ATV tuning method
Autotune variation method determines ultimate gain and period without upsetting process
ATV tuning procedures
Select h (change in MV applied) so that process is not unduly upset but an accurate a results.

Controller output is switched when ys crosses y0

It usually take 3-4 cycles before standing is established

Values a and Pu can be measured
Ziegler Nichols
Uses experimental measurements of the ultimate gain, Ku and ultimate period, Pu to calculate controller settings
Ziegler Nichols procedure
P only controller

Increase Kc until oscillations are sustained for relatively small SP change

Ku = P only controller gain resulting in sustained oscillations

Pu = Period of sustained oscillations

Calculate controller settings based on Ku and Pu