Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
270 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Chimps and bonobos are ---patric
4 subspecies of chimps are ---patric - Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii was first and best studied - J. Goodall at Gombe, T. Nashida at Mahale in the 1960s) |
allo;allo
|
|
Chimps and bonobos are allopatric--- subspecies of chimps are allopatric - Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii was first and best studied - J. Goodall at Gombe, T. Nashida at Mahale in the 1960s)
|
4
|
|
Chimps and bonobos are allopatric4 subspecies of chimps are allopatric - ---was first and best studied - J. Goodall at Gombe, T. Nashida at Mahale in the 1960s)
|
Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to---% heavier than females
Lower craniodental dimorphism in bonobos |
15
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to 15% heavier than females
Lower craniodental dimorphism in--- Bonobo also differs in cranial (more rounded) and mandibular (more gracile) shape Intermembral index = (forelimb/hindlimb)*100 Chimp = 108.7 Bonobo = 102.2 (due to longer thighs) Bonobos have a part in their hair |
bonobos
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to 15% heavier than females
Lower --- dimorphism in bonobos Bonobo also differs in cranial (more rounded) and mandibular (more gracile) shape Intermembral index = (forelimb/hindlimb)*100 Chimp = 108.7 Bonobo = 102.2 (due to longer thighs) Bonobos have a part in their hair |
craniodental
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to 15% heavier than females
Lower craniodental dimorphism in bonobos Bonobo also differs in --- and ---shape Intermembral index = (forelimb/hindlimb)*100 Chimp = 108.7 Bonobo = 102.2 (due to longer thighs) Bonobos have a part in their hair |
cranial (more rounded);mandibular (more gracile)
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to 15% heavier than females
Lower craniodental dimorphism in bonobos Bonobo also differs in cranial (more ---) and mandibular (more ---) shape Intermembral index = (forelimb/hindlimb)*100 Chimp = 108.7 Bonobo = 102.2 (due to longer thighs) Bonobos have a part in their hair |
rounded;gracile
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to 15% heavier than females
Lower craniodental dimorphism in bonobos Bonobo also differs in cranial (more rounded) and mandibular (more gracile) shape Intermembral index = --- Chimp = 108.7 Bonobo = 102.2 (due to longer thighs) --- have a part in their hair |
(forelimb/hindlimb)*100;Bonobos
|
|
Body size dimorphism: males up to 15% heavier than females
Lower craniodental dimorphism in bonobos Bonobo also differs in cranial (more rounded) and mandibular (more gracile) shape Intermembral index = (forelimb/hindlimb)*100 Chimp = --- Bonobo = --- Bonobos have ---in their hair |
108.7;102.2 (due to longer thighs);a part
|
|
General ecology
Chimps Terrain? |
Dense lowland tropical rain forest to savanna woodland
|
|
General ecology
Chimps Diet? |
Highly frugivorous, variable use of terrestrial herbaceous vegetation (THV)
|
|
General ecology
--- Hunting at all sites studied --- hunt more frequently than--- Hunting more likely when large social group Success rate about 50% http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bLhv-aQ5YY Animal protein 8 – 10% of diet; 1-3% mammals; wide variety of species, red colobus favorite |
Chimps;Males; females
|
|
General ecology
Chimps Hunting at all sites studied Males hunt more frequently than females Hunting more likely when--- Success rate about ---% http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bLhv-aQ5YY Animal protein 8 – 10% of diet; 1-3% mammals; wide variety of species, red colobus favorite |
large social group;50
|
|
General ecology
Chimps Dense lowland tropical rain forest to savanna woodland Highly frugivorous, variable use of terrestrial herbaceous vegetation (THV) Hunting at all sites studied Males hunt more frequently than females Hunting more likely when large social group Success rate about 50% http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bLhv-aQ5YY Animal protein ---% of diet; ---% mammals; wide variety of species, red colobus favorite |
8 – 10;1-3
|
|
General ecology
Chimps Dense lowland tropical rain forest to savanna woodland Highly frugivorous, variable use of terrestrial herbaceous vegetation (THV) Hunting at all sites studied Males hunt more frequently than females Hunting more likely when large social group Success rate about 50% http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bLhv-aQ5YY --- 8 – 10% of diet; 1-3% ---; wide variety of species, --- favorite |
Animal protein;mammals;red colobus
|
|
General ecology
--- Lowland rain forest, swamp forest, dry forest, grassland Highly frugivorous and high use of THV Hunting rare despite habitat similarity with some chimps <1% animal protein in diet; small ungulates favored prey |
Bonobo
|
|
General ecology
Bonobo Terrain? |
Lowland rain forest, swamp forest, dry forest, grassland
|
|
General ecology
Bonobo Diet? |
Highly frugivorous and high use of THV
|
|
General ecology
Bonobo Hunting rare despite habitat similarity with some chimps <1% --- in diet; --- favored prey |
animal protein;small ungulates
|
|
General ecology
Bonobo Lowland rain forest, swamp forest, dry forest, grassland Highly frugivorous and high use of THV Hunting rare despite habitat similarity with some chimps ---% animal protein in diet; small ungulates favored prey |
<1
|
|
General ecology
Bonobo Lowland rain forest, swamp forest, dry forest, grassland Highly frugivorous and high use of THV Hunting --- |
rare despite habitat similarity with some chimps
|
|
Group size,organization, and ranging patterns
Both chimps and bonobos live in --- social groups |
multimale/multifemale
|
|
Group size,organization, and ranging patterns
Both chimps and bonobos live in multimale/multifemale social groups --- are philopatric in both chimps and bonobos, though occasional --- transfer has been seen in bonobos --- of both species generally transfer but there are exceptions |
Males;male;Females
|
|
Group size,organization, and ranging patterns
Both chimps and bonobos live in multimale/multifemale social groups Males are philopatric in both chimps and bonobos, though occasional male transfer has been seen in --- Females of both species generally transfer but there are exceptions Group sizes ½ dozen up to 150 in chimps 25 – 75 in bonobos Home ranges are large In both chimps and bonobos groups assemble together and sleep in close proximity at night in nests made fresh daily Day range patterns differ between these species Among chimps males and females vary in daily ranging patterns Among bonobos males and females more typically travel and forage in mixed-sex larger social groups |
bonobos
|
|
Group size,organization, and ranging patterns
chimps and bonobos Group sizes --- up to --- in chimps --- in bonobos |
½ dozen;150;25 – 75
|
|
Group size,organization, and ranging patterns
chimps and bonobos Home ranges are ---(size) In both chimps and bonobos groups assemble together and sleep in--- at night in nests made fresh daily Day range patterns --- between these species |
large; close proximity;differ
|
|
Group size,organization, and ranging patterns
chimps and bonobos Day range patterns differ between these species Among chimps --- Among bonobos--- |
males and females vary in daily ranging patterns; males and females more typically travel and forage in mixed-sex larger social groups
|
|
Felxible social grouping (Chimps +Bonobos)
determinants of group size and composition? |
In general, food abundance and distribution, presence of estrous females, and predation pressure are
|
|
Felxible social grouping (Chimps +Bonobos)
Both chimps and bonobos display ---grouping patterns… |
fission-fusion
|
|
Felxible social grouping (Chimps +Bonobos)
In general, food abundance and distribution, presence of estrous females, and predation pressure are determinants of group size and composition Both chimps and bonobos display fission-fusion grouping patterns…i.e they are flexible and responsive to the above variables BUT…. Greater tendency to break into small parties in ---; individuals may often be alone |
chimps
|
|
Felxible social grouping (Chimps +Bonobos)
In general, food abundance and distribution, presence of estrous females, and predation pressure are determinants of group size and composition Both chimps and bonobos display fission-fusion grouping patterns…i.e they are flexible and responsive to the above variables BUT…. --- tend to stay in larger groups, seldom solitary, grouping is independent of number of estrous females in group |
Bonobos
|
|
Within group social relations… different between species
--- Male dominance and strong M-M bonds Coalitions and alliances common Kin selection possible Male linear rank associated with RS Female dominance hierarchy weaker, but high rank female spatial access to food, esp when scarce Enhanced RS |
Chimp
|
|
Within group social relations… different between species
Chimp --- dominance and strong ---bonds |
Male;M-M
|
|
Within group social relations… different between species
Chimp Male dominance and strong M-M bonds Coalitions and alliances common Kin selection possible Male linear rank associated with--- Female dominance hierarchy weaker, but high rank female spatial access to food, esp when scarce Enhanced--- |
RS; RS
|
|
Within group social relations… different between species
Chimp ---dominance hierarchy weaker, but high rank --- spatial access to food, esp when scarce Enhanced RS |
Female ;Female
|
|
Within group social relations… different between species
Chimp Female dominance hierarchy---, |
weaker
|
|
Chimpanzee reproductive ecology
individuals (within a species) are sensitive to --- |
energy budget
|
|
Chimpanzee reproductive ecology
individuals (within a species) are sensitive to energy budget Females are especially sensitive because reproduction is necessarily more energetically costly for females than for males As net energy availability changes….. --- “decisions” change Trade-offs Growth Maintenance Reproduction |
Allocation
|
|
--- reproductive ecology
individuals (within a species) are sensitive to energy budget Females are especially sensitive because reproduction is necessarily more energetically costly for females than for males As net energy availability changes….. Allocation “decisions” change Trade-offs Growth Maintenance Reproduction |
Chimpanzee
|
|
Proximate causes
How does energy availability impact female reproduction --- is modulated by energy availability There is a continuum of reproductive function |
Hormone biosynthesis
|
|
Proximate causes
How does energy availability impact female reproduction Hormone biosynthesis is modulated by energy availability There is a continuum of reproductive function Low energy – decreased ---production Lower energy = Lowest energy – --- Applicable to resumption of cycling post-weaning Reversible |
ovarian hormone ; pregnancy loss/abandonment;fertility ceases
|
|
Infanticide
--- Infanticide and attacks on juveniles within and between communities Mostly carried out by males High levels at Mahale (16%deaths) Impacts RS of females – a source of infant mortality Females in eastern chimp groups commit infanticide – may decrease within group feeding competition |
Chimps
|
|
Infanticide
Chimps --- on juveniles within and between communities |
Infanticide and attacks
|
|
Infanticide
Chimps Infanticide and attacks on juveniles within and between communities Mostly carried out by --- High levels at Mahale (--%deaths) |
males;16
|
|
Infanticide
Chimps Infanticide and attacks on juveniles within and between communities Mostly carried out by males High levels at ---(16%deaths) Impacts RS of females – a source of infant mortality Females in eastern chimp groups commit infanticide – may decrease within group feeding competition |
Mahale
|
|
Infanticide
Chimps Infanticide and attacks on juveniles within and between communities Mostly carried out by males High levels at Mahale (16%deaths) Impacts RS of females – a source of infant mortality Females in eastern chimp groups commit infanticide – may decrease --- competition |
within group feeding
|
|
Infanticide
Chimps Infanticide and attacks on juveniles within and between communities Mostly carried out by males High levels at Mahale (16%deaths) Impacts RS of females – a source of infant mortality Females in --- groups commit infanticide – may decrease within group feeding competition |
eastern chimp
|
|
Infanticide
--- Infanticide never observed |
Bonobos
|
|
Infanticide
Bonobos Infanticide --- |
never observed
|
|
Mating system?
Chimp --- Females mate with multiple males in succession without outright competition between males |
Opportunistic mating
|
|
Mating system?
Chimp --- Mating with individuals from outside community Females mate with multiple males in succession without outright competition between males |
Extragroup mating
|
|
Mating system?
Chimp --- Male & female leave group, travel together for days/weeks |
Consortship mating
|
|
Mating system?
Chimp --- Coalition mate-guarding, several males work together |
Possessive mating
|
|
Within group social relations… different from chimps
Bonobo ---dominance or co-dominance strong ---bonds |
Female ;F-F
|
|
Within group social relations… different from chimps
Bonobo Female dominance or co-dominance strong F-F bonds (despite --- philopatry and --- dispersal!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0tAQcpLILQ Male-male grooming bouts least common Little evidence for male-male coalitions Maternal rank influences rank of (philopatric) son |
male;female
|
|
Within group social relations… different from chimps
Bonobo Female dominance or co-dominance strong F-F bonds (despite male philopatry and female dispersal!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0tAQcpLILQ --- grooming bouts least common Little evidence for male-male coalitions Maternal rank influences rank of (philopatric) son |
Male-male
|
|
Within group social relations… different from chimps
Bonobo Female dominance or co-dominance strong F-F bonds (despite male philopatry and female dispersal!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0tAQcpLILQ Male-male grooming bouts least common Little evidence for --- coalitions Maternal rank influences rank of (philopatric) son |
male-male
|
|
Within group social relations… different from chimps
Bonobo Female dominance or co-dominance strong F-F bonds (despite male philopatry and female dispersal!) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0tAQcpLILQ Male-male grooming bouts least common Little evidence for male-male coalitions ---rank influences rank of (philopatric) son |
Maternal
|
|
Mating system?
Bonobos (same range, diff frequencies than chimps) ---mating --- mating is tolerated and common --- mating rare in bonobos |
Opportunistic ;Extragroup;Consortships and possessive
|
|
Mating system?
Bonobos (same range, diff frequencies than chimps) Opportunistic mating Extragroup mating is--- Consortships and possessive mating--- |
tolerated and common; rare in bonobos
|
|
Mating system?
Bonobos (same ---, diff ---than chimps) Opportunistic mating Extragroup mating is tolerated and common Consortships and possessive mating rare in bonobos |
range;frequencies
|
|
Sexual behavior
--- Females initiate 1/4 -1/3 mating attempts Copulations rates highest during maximum tumescence |
Chimps
|
|
Sexual behavior
Chimps --- initiate 1/4 -1/3 mating attempts |
Females
|
|
Sexual behavior
Chimps Females initiate--- mating attempts |
1/4 -1/3
|
|
Sexual behavior
Chimps Females initiate 1/4 -1/3 mating attempts Copulations rates highest during --- |
maximum tumescence
|
|
Sexual behavior
--- Mating is Male initiated Copulation rates during IBI > than chimps High level of same sex sexual behavior, esp. among females (G-G rubbing) Sociosexual behavior functions to reduce aggression and mediate feeding competition |
Bonobos
|
|
Sexual behavior
Bonobos Mating is --- initiated |
Male
|
|
Sexual behavior
Bonobos Mating is Male initiated Copulation rates during ---than chimps High level of same sex sexual behavior, esp. among females (G-G rubbing) --- behavior functions to reduce aggression and mediate feeding competition |
IBI > ;Sociosexual
|
|
Sexual behavior
Bonobos Mating is Male initiated Copulation rates during IBI > than chimps High level of --- sexual behavior, esp. among females |
same sex
|
|
Sexual behavior
Bonobos Mating is Male initiated Copulation rates during IBI > than chimps High level of same sex sexual behavior, esp. among ---(---) Sociosexual behavior functions to reduce aggression and mediate feeding competition |
females ;G-G rubbing
|
|
Sexual behavior
Bonobos Mating is Male initiated Copulation rates during IBI > than chimps High level of same sex sexual behavior, esp. among females (G-G rubbing) Sociosexual behavior functions to --- and--- |
reduce aggression; mediate feeding competition
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
--- IBI --- year and duration of lactational amenorrhea varies Ecological constraints clear Sexual swellings 10 -15 days, relatively reliable indicator of ovulation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YQrLPW5DdY&feature=more_related |
Chimp;5-6
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Chimp IBI 5-6 year and duration of --- varies Ecological constraints clear Sexual swellings 10 -15 days, relatively reliable indicator of ovulation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YQrLPW5DdY&feature=more_related |
lactational amenorrhea
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Chimp IBI 5-6 year and duration of lactational amenorrhea varies Ecological constraints clear Sexual swellings 10 -15 days, relatively reliable indicator of --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YQrLPW5DdY&feature=more_related |
ovulation
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Chimp IBI 5-6 year and duration of lactational amenorrhea varies Ecological constraints clear Sexual swellings --- days, relatively reliable indicator of ovulation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YQrLPW5DdY&feature=more_related |
10 -15
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Chimp IBI 5-6 year and duration of lactational amenorrhea --- Ecological constraints clear Sexual swellings 10 -15 days, relatively reliable indicator of ovulation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YQrLPW5DdY&feature=more_related |
varies
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Bonobos IBI and duration of lactational amenorrhea < chimps ---ecologically constrained compared to chimps Sexual swellings through most of cycle, NOT as reliable an indication of ovulation Ovulation may occur post swelling Sexual swelling during pregnancy and lactation |
Less
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Bonobos IBI and duration of lactational amenorrhea --chimps Less ecologically constrained than chimps Sexual swellings through most of cycle, NOT as reliable an indication of ovulation Ovulation may occur post swelling Sexual swelling during pregnancy and lactation |
<
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Bonobos ---and---- < chimps Less ecologically constrained than chimps Sexual swellings through most of cycle, NOT as reliable an indication of ovulation Ovulation may occur post swelling Sexual swelling during pregnancy and lactation |
IBI and duration of lactational amenorrhea
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Bonobos IBI and duration of lactational amenorrhea < chimps Less ecologically constrained than chimps --- through most of cycle, NOT as reliable an indication of ovulation Ovulation may occur post swelling Sexual swelling during pregnancy and lactation |
Sexual swellings
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
--- IBI and duration of lactational amenorrhea < chimps Less ecologically constrained than chimps Sexual swellings through most of cycle, NOT as reliable an indication of ovulation Ovulation may occur post swelling Sexual swelling during pregnancy and lactation |
Bonobos
|
|
Life history and reproductive ecology
Bonobos IBI and duration of lactational amenorrhea < chimps Less ecologically constrained than chimps Sexual swellings through most of cycle, NOT as reliable an indication of ovulation Ovulation may occur--- Sexual swelling during--- |
post swelling; pregnancy and lactation
|
|
Recall: Flexible social grouping
In general, ---are determinants of group size and composition |
food abundance and distribution, presence of estrous females, and predation pressure
|
|
Recall: Within group social relations very different between species
--- Female dominance or co-cominance over males and strong F-F bonds (despite male philopatry and female dispersal!) Females lead in feeding parties http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0tAQcpLILQ Little evidence for male-male coalitions Male-male grooming bouts least common Female – female relations in group cohesiveness Maternal rank influences rank of (philopatric) son Could this be a social explanation for mixed sex grouping? Ecological explanations for mixed sex feeding/foraging parties Note distinction between “feeding” and “foraging” |
Bonobo
|
|
Between community relations
--- Very territorial, patrol borders, lethal aggression All male patrols first described in eastern sites (Gombe, Mahale); mixed sex patrols in west Protecting food resources and mates |
Chimp
|
|
Between community relations
Chimp Very territorial, patrol borders, lethal aggression --- patrols first described in eastern sites (Gombe, Mahale); --- patrols in west Protecting food resources and mates |
All male;mixed sex
|
|
Between community relations
Chimp Very territorial, patrol borders, lethal aggression All male patrols first described in eastern sites (Gombe, Mahale); mixed sex patrols in west Protecting --- |
food resources and mates
|
|
Between community relations…different betweem species
--- Territorial but less aggressive, home range overlap Intergroup encounters can include grooming, mating and sociosexual behavior Possibly less mating and feeding competition than chimps |
Bonobo
|
|
Between community relations…different betweem species
Bonobo Territorial but less aggressive, home range overlap Intergroup encounters can include ---l behavior Possibly less mating and feeding competition than chimps |
grooming, mating and sociosexua
|
|
Between community relations…different betweem species
Bonobo Territorial but less aggressive, home range overlap Intergroup encounters can include grooming, mating and sociosexual behavior Possibly --- mating and feeding competition than chimps |
less
|
|
Between community relations…different betweem species
Bonobo Territorial, --- aggressive, home range overlap Intergroup encounters can include grooming, mating and sociosexual behavior Possibly less mating and feeding competition than chimps |
less
|
|
Between community relations…different betweem species
Bonobo Territorial but less aggressive, home range --- Intergroup encounters can include grooming, mating and sociosexual behavior Possibly less mating and feeding competition than chimps |
overlap
|
|
Between community relations…different betweem species
Bonobo Territorial but less aggressive, home range overlap Intergroup encounters can include grooming, mating and sociosexual behavior Possibly less ---than chimps |
mating and feeding competition
|
|
Chimps and Bonobos
--- and ---shared a common ancestor approximately 1 million years ago They are equally closely related to humans Underlying ecology may explain some of the behavioral differences between them Group structure, male and female behavior differs between the species |
Pan troglodytes;Pan paniscus
|
|
Chimps and Bonobos
Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus shared a common ancestor approximately-- million years ago They are equally closely related to humans Underlying ecology may explain some of the behavioral differences between them Group structure, male and female behavior differs between the species |
1
|
|
Chimps and Bonobos
Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus shared a common ancestor approximately 1 million years ago They are equally closely related to humans Underlying ecology may explain some of the behavioral differences between them ---differs between the species |
Group structure, male and female behavior
|
|
Chimps and Bonobos
Pan troglodytes and Pan paniscus shared a common ancestor approximately 1 million years ago They are equally closely related to humans Underlying --- may explain some of the behavioral differences between them Group structure, male and female behavior differs between the species |
ecology
|
|
Hominidae Phylogeny
remember – phylogeny refers to--- Gorillas = our closet relatives after Chimp/bonobo |
the evolutionary relationship among taxonomic groups
|
|
Hominidae Phylogeny
remember – phylogeny refers to the evolutionary relationship among taxonomic groups --- = our closet relatives after Chimp/bonobo |
Gorillas
|
|
Hominidae Phylogeny
remember – phylogeny refers to the evolutionary relationship among taxonomic groups Gorillas = our closet relatives after --- |
Chimp/bonobo
|
|
--- Phylogeny
remember – phylogeny refers to the evolutionary relationship among taxonomic groups Gorillas = our closet relatives after Chimp/bonobo |
Hominidae
|
|
Geographic range (Gorilla)
--- to ---- |
Coastal lowland forests;3700m (>12,000ft) altitude
|
|
Geographic range (Gorilla)
Coastal lowland forests to 3700m (>12,000ft) altitude 2 allopatric species ---: western lowland and cross river gorilla ---: eastern lowland(Graurer’s) and mountain gorilla Split 0.9 – 1.6 MYA |
Gorilla gorilla;Gorilla beringei
|
|
Geographic range (Gorilla)
Coastal lowland forests to 3700m (>12,000ft) altitude 2 allopatric species Gorilla gorilla: --- and ---gorilla Gorilla beringei: ---and ---gorilla Split 0.9 – 1.6 MYA |
western lowland;cross river ;eastern lowland(Graurer’s) ;mountain
|
|
Geographic range (Gorilla)
Coastal lowland forests to 3700m (>12,000ft) altitude 2 allopatric species Gorilla gorilla: western lowland and cross river gorilla Gorilla beringei: eastern lowland(---) and mountain gorilla Split 0.9 – 1.6 MYA |
Graurer’s
|
|
Geographic range (Gorilla)
Coastal lowland forests to 3700m (>12,000ft) altitude 2 allopatric species Gorilla gorilla: western lowland and cross river gorilla Gorilla beringei: eastern lowland(Graurer’s) and mountain gorilla Split--- MYA |
0.9 – 1.6
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Gorilla)
Diet? |
Largely vegetarian, +ants and termites
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Gorilla)
Largely vegetarian, +ants and termites --- body size, --- hind gut, and slow passage rate through hindgut where fermentation takes place enable this diet Historically, mountain gorillas 1st and best studied Folivore/herbivore Now know folivore/frugivore more accurate |
Large;enlarged
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Gorilla)
Largely vegetarian, +ants and termites Large body size, enlarged hind gut, and --- passage rate through hindgut where--- takes place enable this diet Historically, mountain gorillas 1st and best studied Folivore/herbivore Now know folivore/frugivore more accurate |
slow; fermentation
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Gorilla)
Largely vegetarian, +ants and termites Large body size, enlarged ---, and slow passage rate through---where fermentation takes place enable this diet Historically, mountain gorillas 1st and best studied Folivore/herbivore Now know folivore/frugivore more accurate |
hind gut;hind gut
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Gorilla)
Largely vegetarian, +ants and termites Large body size, enlarged hind gut, and slow passage rate through hindgut where fermentation takes place enable this diet Historically, --- gorillas 1st and best studied Folivore/herbivore Now know folivore/frugivore more accurate |
mountain
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Gorilla)
Largely vegetarian, +ants and termites Large body size, enlarged hind gut, and slow passage rate through hindgut where fermentation takes place enable this diet Historically, mountain gorillas 1st and best studied Diet? |
Folivore/herbivore Now know folivore/frugivore more accurate
|
|
Ranging patterns (Gorilla)
territorial? |
Not territorial
|
|
Ranging patterns (Gorilla)
Not territorial Because of high variation in use of fruit can test impact of feeding ecology on ranging patterns --- positively correlated to amount of fruit consumed Home range size is influenced by fruit consumption mate-acquisition strategies group size and demographics population density |
Day travel distance
|
|
Ranging patterns (Gorilla)
Not territorial Because of high variation in use of fruit can test impact of feeding ecology on ranging patterns Day travel distance positively correlated to --- Home range size is influenced by fruit consumption mate-acquisition strategies group size and demographics population density |
amount of fruit consumed
|
|
Ranging patterns (Gorilla)
Not territorial Because of high variation in use of fruit can test impact of feeding ecology on ranging patterns Day travel distance positively correlated to amount of fruit consumed Home range size is influenced by (4) |
fruit consumption
mate-acquisition strategies group size and demographics population density |
|
Ranging patterns (Gorilla)
Not territorial Because of ---- can test impact of feeding ecology on ranging patterns Day travel distance positively correlated to amount of fruit consumed Home range size is influenced by fruit consumption mate-acquisition strategies group size and demographics population density |
high variation in use of fruit
|
|
Ranging patterns (---)
Not territorial Because of high variation in use of fruit can test impact of feeding ecology on ranging patterns Day travel distance positively correlated to amount of fruit consumed Home range size is influenced by fruit consumption mate-acquisition strategies group size and demographics population density |
Gorilla
|
|
Group Structure and Dispersal Patterns (Gorilla)
Average group size: --- Either sex may be philopatric Either sex may disperse from their natal group, most common fro females Emmigration (leave) vs. immigration (enter) Inbreeding avoidance Secondary dispersal for both sexes is documented Variability may be due to demographic factors |
9 - 10
|
|
Group Structure and Dispersal Patterns (Gorilla)
Average group size: 9 - 10 ---- philopatric |
Either sex may be
|
|
Group Structure and Dispersal Patterns (Gorilla)
Average group size: 9 - 10 Either sex may be philopatric Either sex may disperse from their natal group, most common for --- |
females
|
|
Group Structure and Dispersal Patterns (Gorilla)
Average group size: 9 - 10 Either sex may be philopatric Either sex may disperse from their natal group, most common fro females Emmigration (leave) vs. immigration (enter) --- avoidance --- dispersal for both sexes is documented Variability may be due to demographic factors |
Inbreeding;Secondary
|
|
Group Structure and Dispersal Patterns (Gorilla)
Average group size: 9 - 10 Either sex may be philopatric Either sex may disperse from their natal group, most common fro females Emmigration (leave) vs. immigration (enter) Inbreeding avoidance Secondary dispersal for both sexes is documented Variability may be due to --- factors |
demographic
|
|
Gorilla mating patterns
Often --- m:f ratio? |
polygyny ;single-male (silverback)/multi-female
|
|
Gorilla mating patterns
Often polygyny single-male (silverback)/multi-female High male-male ---competition for mating opportunities Function for females as protection from infanticide Sometimes Polygamous mating multi-male/multi-female groups sons of silverback may stay but other males are unrelated Moderate reproductive skew |
precopulatory
|
|
Gorilla mating patterns
Often polygyny single-male (silverback)/multi-female High male-male precopulatory competition for mating opportunities Function for females as protection from --- Sometimes Polygamous mating multi-male/multi-female groups sons of silverback may stay but other males are unrelated Moderate reproductive skew |
infanticide
|
|
Gorilla mating patterns
Often polygyny single-male (silverback)/multi-female High male-male precopulatory competition for mating opportunities Function for females as protection from infanticide Sometimes --- mating --- groups |
Polygamous;multi-male/multi-female
|
|
Gorilla mating patterns
Often polygyny single-male (silverback)/multi-female High male-male precopulatory competition for mating opportunities Function for females as protection from infanticide Sometimes Polygamous mating multi-male/multi-female groups --- may stay but other males are unrelated Moderate reproductive skew |
sons of silverback
|
|
Gorilla Summary
Compared/contrasted with Chimp/Bonobo Our next closest relative Greater --- in dispersal patterns Larger body size, higher level of sexual dimorphism, more herbacious diet, smaller group size, tendency to polygyny |
flexibility
|
|
Gorilla Summary
Compared/contrasted with Chimp/Bonobo Our next closest relative Greater flexibility in dispersal patterns --- body size, higher level of sexual dimorphism, more herbacious diet, smaller group size, tendency to polygyny |
Larger
|
|
Gorilla Summary
Compared/contrasted with Chimp/Bonobo Our next closest relative Greater flexibility in dispersal patterns Larger body size, -- dimorphism, more herbacious diet, smaller group size, tendency to polygyny |
higher level of sexual
|
|
Gorilla Summary
Compared/contrasted with Chimp/Bonobo Our next closest relative Greater flexibility in dispersal patterns Larger body size, higher level of sexual dimorphism, --- diet, smaller group size, tendency to polygyny |
more herbacious
|
|
Gorilla Summary
Compared/contrasted with Chimp/Bonobo Our next closest relative Greater flexibility in dispersal patterns Larger body size, higher level of sexual dimorphism, more herbacious diet,--- group size, tendency to polygyny |
smaller
|
|
Gorilla Summary
Compared/contrasted with Chimp/Bonobo Our next closest relative Greater flexibility in dispersal patterns Larger body size, higher level of sexual dimorphism, more herbacious diet, smaller group size, tendency to what mating? |
polygyny
|
|
-- are our closet relatives after Chimp/bonobo and Gorilla
|
Orangutans
|
|
Orangutans
Orangs are our closet relatives after --- Diverged about 12 MYA |
Chimp/bonobo and Gorilla
|
|
Orangutans
Orangs are our closet relatives after Chimp/bonobo and Gorilla Diverged about ---MYA |
12 MYA
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
--- level of sexual dimorphism |
High
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
High level of sexual dimorphism F ---lbs,--- ft; M ---lbs,--- ft |
80; 2 ½;190; 3+
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
High level of sexual dimorphism F 80lbs, 2 ½ ft; M 190lbs, 3+ ft SD ratio--- Largest primarily arboreal mammal Highly frugivorous Mostly solitary Long hands and feet, shallow, hyperflexible hip joint Quadrumanuous clamboring Males display bi-maturation Results in 2 adult phenotypes “flanged” males unflanged” males |
2.22:1
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
High level of sexual dimorphism F 80lbs, 2 ½ ft; M 190lbs, 3+ ft SD ratio 2.22:1 Largest primarily --- mammal Highly frugivorous Mostly solitary Long hands and feet, shallow, hyperflexible hip joint Quadrumanuous clamboring Males display bi-maturation Results in 2 adult phenotypes “flanged” males unflanged” males |
arboreal
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
Social of solitary? Long hands and feet, shallow, hyperflexible hip joint Quadrumanuous clamboring Males display bi-maturation Results in 2 adult phenotypes “flanged” males unflanged” males |
mostly solitary
|
|
(Orangutan)
Diet type? |
Highly frugivorous
|
|
Two Species of Orangutan
Split dated at about ---MYA Pongo pygmaeus, P. abellii Some morphological differences |
1.5
|
|
Two Species of Orangutan?
|
Pongo pygmaeus, P. abellii
|
|
Two Species of Orangutan
Split dated at about 1.5 MYA Pongo pygmaeus, P. abellii Some --- differences |
morphological
|
|
Geographic Distribution (Orangutan)
Once throughout ---(fossil evidence) Now ONLY--- In true wet rain forests (2000 – 4500mm avg. annual rainfall) Pongo pygmaeus Pongo abelii Allopatric species |
Asia ; Borneo and Sumatra
|
|
Geographic Distribution (Orangutan)
habitat type? |
true wet rain forests (2000 – 4500mm avg. annual rainfall)
|
|
Geographic Distribution (Orangutan)
Once throughout Asia (fossil evidence) Now ONLY Borneo and Sumatra In true wet rain forests (---mm avg. annual rainfall) Pongo pygmaeus Pongo abelii Allopatric species |
2000 – 4500
|
|
Geographic Distribution (Orangutan)
Once throughout Asia (fossil evidence) Now ONLY Borneo and Sumatra In true wet rain forests (2000 – 4500mm avg. annual rainfall) Pongo pygmaeus Pongo abelii ---patric species |
Allo
|
|
General Ecology and Activity (Orangutan)
--- of the oldest forests on earth Lowland dipterocarp forests, primary tropical rainforests and old secondary forests, lowland swamp and peat swamp 95% time eating, resting and traveling between eating and resting sites Day range up to 2 miles Home range of males >> females |
Isolated fragments
|
|
General Ecology and Activity (Orangutan)
Isolated fragments of the --- Lowland dipterocarp forests, primary tropical rainforests and old secondary forests, lowland swamp and peat swamp 95% time eating, resting and traveling between eating and resting sites Day range up to 2 miles Home range of males >> females |
oldest forests on earth
|
|
General Ecology and Activity (Orangutan)
Isolated fragments of the oldest forests on earth --- forests, --- and ---forests, lowland swamp and peat swamp 95% time eating, resting and traveling between eating and resting sites Day range up to 2 miles Home range of males >> females |
Lowland dipterocarp;primary tropical rainforests;old secondary
|
|
General Ecology and Activity (Orangutan)
Isolated fragments of the oldest forests on earth Lowland dipterocarp forests, primary tropical rainforests and old secondary forests, ---swamp and---swamp 95% time eating, resting and traveling between eating and resting sites Day range up to 2 miles Home range of males >> females |
lowland ; peat
|
|
General Ecology and Activity (Orangutan)
Isolated fragments of the oldest forests on earth Lowland dipterocarp forests, primary tropical rainforests and old secondary forests, lowland swamp and peat swamp ---% time eating, resting and traveling between eating and resting sites Day range up to 2 miles Home range of males >> females |
95
|
|
General Ecology and Activity (Orangutan)
Isolated fragments of the oldest forests on earth Lowland dipterocarp forests, primary tropical rainforests and old secondary forests, lowland swamp and peat swamp 95% time eating, resting and traveling between eating and resting sites Day range up to --- --- have larger home range |
2 miles;Males
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Orangutan)
Diet? |
Primarily frugivore but also buds, flowers, young leaves, bark, sap, reed roots, bird eggs, spider webs, termites, caterpillars, ants, fungi, honey, and other various plant parts (http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/orangutan)
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Orangutan)
Primarily frugivore but also buds, flowers, young leaves, bark, sap, reed roots, bird eggs, spider webs, termites, caterpillars, ants, fungi, honey, and other various plant parts (http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/orangutan) ---family of trees |
Dipterocarpaceae
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Orangutan)
Mast --- ---year intervals Nearly 90% of fruiting is synchronized Subsequent periods of extremely low fruit availability Sumatra less extreme variation than Borneo Primarily solitary foragers |
fruiting cycles;2-10
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Orangutan)
Mast fruiting cycles 2-10 year intervals Nearly 90% of fruiting is --- Subsequent periods of extremely low fruit availability Sumatra less extreme variation than Borneo Primarily solitary foragers |
synchronized
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Orangutan)
2-10 year intervals Nearly 90% of fruiting is synchronized Subsequent periods of extremely low fruit availability -- less extreme variation than --- Primarily---foragers |
Sumatra;Borneo; solitary
|
|
Feeding Ecology (Orangutan)
Mast fruiting cycles 2-10 year intervals Nearly ---% of fruiting is synchronized Subsequent periods of--- Sumatra less extreme variation than Borneo Primarily solitary foragers |
90; extremely low fruit availability
|
|
Ranging (Orangutan)
--- and ---range alone Resident females have HR with immature offspring that overlaps that of other females Resident males (flanged) have large HR that overlaps several female HR. (primary breeder) Non-resident males (both adult and subadult) and females range broadly overlapping with resident animals |
Adult males;independent adolescents of both sexes
|
|
Ranging (Orangutan)
Adult males and independent adolescents of both sexes range alone --- have HR with immature offspring that overlaps that of other females ---have large HR that overlaps several female HR. (primary breeder) Non-resident males (both adult and subadult) and females range broadly overlapping with resident animals |
Resident females;Resident males (flanged)
|
|
Ranging (Orangutan)
Adult males and independent adolescents of both sexes range alone Resident females have HR with immature offspring that overlaps that of other females Resident males (flanged) have large HR that overlaps several female HR. (primary breeder) --- (both adult and subadult) and females range broadly overlapping with resident animals |
Non-resident males
|
|
Dispersal (Orangutan)
Some degree of--- philopatry Males disperse over long distances from their mother and female kin Experience a nomadic phase Males do not acquire a home range in which they are the Resident male until they displace an existing dominant male |
Female
|
|
Dispersal (Orangutan)
Some degree of Female philopatry Males disperse over---distances from their mother and female kin |
long
|
|
Dispersal (Orangutan)
Some degree of Female philopatry Males disperse over long distances from their mother and female kin Experience a --- phase Males do not acquire a home range in which they are the Resident male until they displace an existing dominant male |
nomadic
|
|
Dispersal (Orangutan)
Some degree of Female philopatry Males disperse over long distances from their mother and female kin Experience a nomadic phase Males do not acquire a home range in which they are the Resident male until --- |
they displace an existing dominant male
|
|
Social Organization (Orangutan)
Classed as --- Slow to learn about this because animals so often solitary Overlapping ranges means occasional social contact Resident males agonistic; dominance hierarchy if in regular contact Resident females can be aggressive, avoid, or affable Temporary feeding aggregations ( if food scarce, travel independently) Travel bands (when high food availability) |
semi-solitary
|
|
Social Organization (Orangutan)
Classed as semi-solitary Slow to learn about this because --- Overlapping ranges means occasional social contact Resident males agonistic; dominance hierarchy if in regular contact Resident females can be aggressive, avoid, or affable Temporary feeding aggregations ( if food scarce, travel independently) Travel bands (when high food availability) |
animals so often solitary
|
|
Social Organization (Orangutan)
Classed as semi-solitary Slow to learn about this because animals so often solitary Overlapping ranges means --- Resident males agonistic; dominance hierarchy if in regular contact Resident females can be aggressive, avoid, or affable Temporary feeding aggregations ( if food scarce, travel independently) Travel bands (when high food availability) |
occasional social contact
|
|
Social Organization (Orangutan)
Classed as semi-solitary Slow to learn about this because animals so often solitary --- means occasional social contact Resident males agonistic; dominance hierarchy if in regular contact Resident females can be aggressive, avoid, or affable Temporary feeding aggregations ( if food scarce, travel independently) Travel bands (when high food availability) |
Overlapping ranges
|
|
Social Organization (Orangutan)
Classed as semi-solitary Slow to learn about this because animals so often solitary Overlapping ranges means occasional social contact --- agonistic; dominance hierarchy if in regular contact --- can be aggressive, avoid, or affable Temporary feeding aggregations ( if food scarce, travel independently) Travel bands (when high food availability) |
Resident males;Resident females
|
|
Developmental patterns (Orangutan)
---infant mortality, --- maternal investment |
Low ;extremely high level of
|
|
Developmental patterns (Orangutan)
Low infant mortality, extremely high level of maternal investment IBI--- years, may continue to carry up to age --and nurse until age --- |
7-9;6 ;8
|
|
Developmental patterns (Orangutan)
Low infant mortality, extremely high level of maternal investment IBI 7-9 years, may continue to carry up to age 6 and nurse until age 8 Juveniles not ecological independent until ---years of age Males – bimaturation, can remain unflanged for up to 20 years post-puberty |
8-10
|
|
Developmental patterns (Orangutan)
Low infant mortality, extremely high level of maternal investment IBI 7-9 years, may continue to carry up to age 6 and nurse until age 8 Juveniles not ecological independent until 8-10 years of age Males – ---, can remain unflanged for up to 20 years post-puberty |
bimaturation
|
|
Developmental patterns (Orangutan)
Low infant mortality, extremely high level of maternal investment IBI 7-9 years, may continue to carry up to age 6 and nurse until age 8 Juveniles not ecological independent until 8-10 years of age Males – bimaturation, can remain ---for up to --- years post-puberty |
unflanged ;20
|
|
Developmental patterns (Orangutan)
Low infant mortality, extremely high level of maternal investment IBI 7-9 years, may continue to carry up to age 6 and nurse until age 8 Juveniles not ecological independent until 8-10 years of age --- – bimaturation, can remain unflanged for up to 20 years post-puberty |
Males
|
|
Male-female relations (Orangutan)
---long term associations |
Some
|
|
Male-female relations (Orangutan)
Some long term associations Mating frequency--- |
very low
|
|
Male-female relations (Orangutan)
Some long term associations Mating frequency very low – females very sensitive to ---- Forced copulations are common, both flanged and unflanged males exhibit this behavior Female preference expressed Relatively little difference if RS of flanged vs. unflanged males |
energy constraints
|
|
Male-female relations (Orangutan)
Some long term associations Mating frequency very low – females very sensitive to energy constraints --- are common, both flanged and unflanged males exhibit this behavior Female preference expressed Relatively little difference if RS of flanged vs. unflanged males |
Forced copulations
|
|
Male-female relations (Orangutan)
Some long term associations Mating frequency very low – females very sensitive to energy constraints Forced copulations are common, both flanged and unflanged males exhibit this behavior ---preference expressed Relatively little difference if RS --- males |
Female ;of flanged vs. unflanged
|
|
Male-female relations (Orangutan)
Some long term associations Mating frequency very low – females very sensitive to energy constraints Forced copulations are common,--- males exhibit this behavior Female preference expressed Relatively little difference if RS of flanged vs. unflanged males |
both flanged and unflanged
|
|
Bimaturation in males (orangutan)
Puberty ---yr Full development of 2O sexual characteristics 15 – 20yr When “proper” social conditions arise, i.e. in the absence of resident, flanged male Alternatively, delay up to 20 yr post-puberty Function of long calls of flanged, resident males Attract females Suppress other males development |
8 – 15
|
|
Bimaturation in males (orangutan)
Puberty 8 – 15yr Full development of 2O sexual characteristics 15 – 20yr When “proper” social conditions arise, i.e. in the absence of resident, flanged male Alternatively, delay up to 20 yr post-puberty Function of --- of flanged, resident males Attract females Suppress other males development |
long calls
|
|
Bimaturation in males (orangutan)
Puberty 8 – 15yr Full development of 2O sexual characteristics ---yr When “proper” social conditions arise, i.e. in the absence of resident, flanged male Alternatively, delay up to 20 yr post-puberty Function of long calls of flanged, resident males Attract females Suppress other males development |
15 – 20
|
|
Bimaturation in males (orangutan)
Puberty 8 – 15yr Full development of --sexual characteristics 15 – 20yr When “proper” social conditions arise, i.e. in the absence of resident, flanged male Alternatively, delay up to 20 yr post-puberty Function of long calls of flanged, resident males Attract females Suppress other males development |
2O
|
|
Bimaturation in males (orangutan)
Puberty 8 – 15yr Full development of 2O sexual characteristics 15 – 20yr When “proper” social conditions arise, i.e. in the absence of--- Alternatively, delay up to 20 yr post-puberty Function of long calls of flanged, resident males Attract females Suppress other males development |
resident, flanged male
|
|
Bimaturation in males (orangutan)
Puberty 8 – 15yr Full development of 2O sexual characteristics 15 – 20yr When “proper” social conditions arise, i.e. in the absence of resident, flanged male Alternatively, delay up to --- yr post-puberty Function of long calls of flanged, resident males --- |
20;Attract females
Suppress other males development |
|
Lesser Apes” (---)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” Unique combination of behaviors highly frugivorous, territorial, stable pair-bonds, regular vocalizations Monomorphic Body size Both sexes large, saber-like canines canines Unique morphology related to “true” brachiation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV-gOL4t9Vk |
Gibbons
|
|
Lesser Apes” (Gibbons)
Retain some --- features ---bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” |
OWM;Smaller
|
|
Lesser Apes” (Gibbons)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes ----, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” |
Ischial callosities
|
|
Lesser Apes” (Gibbons)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep ---do not make nests like “great apes” |
sitting up
|
|
Lesser Apes” (Gibbons)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” Unique combination of behaviors Diet? |
highly frugivorous,
|
|
Lesser Apes” (Gibbons)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” Unique combination of behaviors highly frugivorous, territorial, --- pair-bonds, regular vocalizations ---morphic Body size |
stable;Mono
|
|
Biogeography (Gibbons)
Found in --- and --- |
southeast Asia;southern China
|
|
Biogeography (Gibbons)
Found in southeast Asia and southern China Gibbons are ---patric BUT Symphalangus ---patric with Hylobates |
allo;sym
|
|
Biogeography (Gibbons)
Found in southeast Asia and southern China Gibbons are allopatric BUT --- sympatric with --- |
Symphalangus ;Hylobates
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
---: diploid number, 44 chromosomes; asexual dichromatism Hoolock: diploid number, 38 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism Nomascus: diploid number, 52 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism Symphalangus: diploid number, 50 chromosomes; largest body size, up to about 15kg |
Hylobates
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hylobates: diploid number, 44 chromosomes; asexual dichromatism ---: diploid number, 38 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism Nomascus: diploid number, 52 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism Symphalangus: diploid number, 50 chromosomes; largest body size, up to about 15kg |
Hoolock
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hylobates: diploid number, 44 chromosomes; asexual dichromatism Hoolock: diploid number, 38 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism ---: diploid number, 52 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism Symphalangus: diploid number, 50 chromosomes; largest body size, up to about 15kg |
Nomascus
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hylobates: diploid number, 44 chromosomes; asexual dichromatism Hoolock: diploid number, 38 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism Nomascus: diploid number, 52 chromosomes; sexual dichromatism ---: diploid number, 50 chromosomes; largest body size, up to about 15kg |
Symphalangus
|
|
Vocalizations or Songs (Gibbons)
---are also distinguished by vocalizations (genera differ) |
Taxa
|
|
Vocalizations or Songs (Gibbons)
Taxa are also distinguished by vocalizations (genera differ) Function to --- and--- |
cement the pair bond; support territoriality
|
|
Vocalizations or Songs (Gibbons)
Taxa are also distinguished by vocalizations (genera differ) Function to cement the pair bond and support territoriality Both solos and duets; duets have ---, female great call and male reply http://www.gibbons.de/main/sound.html |
introductory sequence
|
|
Vocalizations or Songs (Gibbons)
Taxa are also distinguished by vocalizations (genera differ) Function to cement the pair bond and support territoriality Both solos and duets; duets have introductory sequence, --- great call and--- reply http://www.gibbons.de/main/sound.html |
female; male
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
Occupy---- territories Home range about --- ha, may defend about ---% range |
small well defended;40;80
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
Travel territories thoroughly in search of --- |
ripe fruit
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
Occupy small well defended territories Home range about 40 ha, may defend about 80% range Travel territories thoroughly in search of ripe fruit Fruit ---% diet on average, also young leaves, flowers, insects Figs as an important fruit (25% diet) Symphalangus and Nomascus > leaves than other taxa Terminal branch feeding important |
59
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
Occupy small well defended territories Home range about 40 ha, may defend about 80% range Travel territories thoroughly in search of ripe fruit Fruit 59% diet on average, also --- |
young leaves, flowers, insects
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
Occupy small well defended territories Home range about 40 ha, may defend about 80% range Travel territories thoroughly in search of ripe fruit Fruit 59% diet on average, also young leaves, flowers, insects --- as an important fruit (---% diet) Symphalangus and Nomascus > leaves than other taxa Terminal branch feeding important |
Figs;25
|
|
Locomotion and foraging (Gibbons)
True --- Rapid swinging locomotion; hook-like hands and super-flexible shoulder, elbow and wrist Energetically demanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLFHPd8LX0 |
brachiators
|
|
Locomotion and foraging (Gibbons)
True brachiators --- locomotion; hook-like hands and super-flexible shoulder, elbow and wrist Energetically demanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLFHPd8LX0 |
Rapid swinging
|
|
Locomotion and foraging (Gibbons)
True brachiators Rapid swinging locomotion; ---hands and super-flexible shoulder, elbow and wrist Energetically demanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLFHPd8LX0 |
hook-like
|
|
Locomotion and foraging (Gibbons)
True brachiators Rapid swinging locomotion; hook-like hands and super-flexible --- Energetically demanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLFHPd8LX0 |
shoulder, elbow and wrist
|
|
Locomotion and foraging (Gibbons)
True brachiators Rapid swinging locomotion; hook-like hands and super-flexible shoulder, elbow and wrist --- demanding |
Energetically
|
|
Locomotion and foraging (---)
True brachiators Rapid swinging locomotion; hook-like hands and super-flexible shoulder, elbow and wrist Energetically demanding http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLFHPd8LX0 |
Gibbons
|
|
Territoriality (Gibbons)
Indicated by behavior during --- |
intergroup encounters
|
|
Territoriality (Gibbons)
Indicated by behavior during intergroup encounters Explain... |
Vocalizations, male and female solos, duets
Protracted chases between adults, especially males Occasionally (but rarely) lethal Explanation for territoriality is not well understood |
|
Territoriality (---)
Indicated by behavior during intergroup encounters Vocalizations, male and female solos, duets Protracted chases between adults, especially males Occasionally (but rarely) lethal Explanation for territoriality is not well understood |
Gibbons
|
|
Social group structure (Gibbons)
Often--- social group: |
pair-bonded
|
|
Social group structure (Gibbons)
Often pair-bonded social group: --- adults ---- offspring Both sexes disperse, but dispersal is short distance - Adjacent groups contain kin Pair formation Less stable than originally thought New pairs “newlywed” model Take over model Replacement after death, disappearance or desertion |
two;1 – 3
|
|
Social group structure (Gibbons)
Often pair-bonded social group: two adults 1 – 3 offspring ---- disperse, but dispersal is --- distance - Adjacent groups contain kin Pair formation Less stable than originally thought New pairs “newlywed” model Take over model Replacement after death, disappearance or desertion |
Both sexes;short
|
|
Social group structure (Gibbons)
Often pair-bonded social group: two adults 1 – 3 offspring Both sexes disperse, but dispersal is short distance - ---groups contain kin Pair formation Less stable than originally thought New pairs “newlywed” model Take over model Replacement after death, disappearance or desertion |
Adjacent
|
|
Social group structure (---)
Often pair-bonded social group: two adults 1 – 3 offspring Both sexes disperse, but dispersal is short distance - Adjacent groups contain kin Pair formation Less stable than originally thought New pairs “newlywed” model Take over model Replacement after death, disappearance or desertion |
Gibbons
|
|
True Monogamy? (Gibbons)
--- is most common |
Two-adult group with their own offspring
|
|
True Monogamy? (Gibbons)
Two-adult group with their own offspring is most common Numerous exceptions occur Extra-pair copulations documented Females (H. lar) at some sites maintain simultaneous sexual relations with ≥ 2 males, 21% in socially polyandrous groups --- are sometimes polygynous |
Crested gibbons (Nomascus)
|
|
Socioecology of Hylobatidae: Why pair-bonding?
-- are an “overdispersed” resource --- patch size specialists Female antagonism due to feeding competition Males engage in pair bonds because Cannot defend > 1 female Protect against infanticide To guard their mate and assure paternity given the potential for EPCs Defend food resources given constraints of feeding ecology |
Females;Small fruit, small food
|
|
Socioecology of Hylobatidae: Why pair-bonding?
Females are an “overdispersed” resource Small fruit, small food patch size specialists Female antagonism due to--- Males engage in pair bonds because Cannot defend > 1 female Protect against infanticide To guard their mate and assure paternity given the potential for EPCs Defend food resources given constraints of feeding ecology |
feeding competition
|
|
Socioecology of Hylobatidae: Why pair-bonding?
Females are an “overdispersed” resource Small fruit, small food patch size specialists --- antagonism due to feeding competition Males engage in pair bonds because Cannot defend > 1 female Protect against infanticide To guard their mate and assure paternity given the potential for EPCs Defend food resources given constraints of feeding ecology |
female
|
|
Socioecology of Hylobatidae: Why pair-bonding?
Females are an “overdispersed” resource Small fruit, small food patch size specialists Female antagonism due to feeding competition Males engage in pair bonds because |
Cannot defend > 1 female
Protect against infanticide To guard their mate and assure paternity given the potential for EPCs Defend food resources given constraints of feeding ecology |
|
LCA and beyond
Humans shared a common ancestor with --- ≈7 MYA “LCA” = last common ancestor Fossil record of our lineage rich What do we know? 4-5 MYA: chimp-size brain, high sexual dimorphism, and bipedal 2-4 MYA: chimp-size brain, body but not canine dimorphism, bipedal 2 MYA onward: brain size expansion, larger body size, reduced dimorphism, efficient bipedalism, slowed life history, stone tool use Moasic evolution of body, brain, teeth Film clip “Bipeds Evolving” http://digital.films.com.libproxy.temple.edu/PortalViewVideo.aspx?xtid=56001# |
chimp/bonobo
|
|
LCA and beyond
Humans shared a common ancestor with chimp/bonobo ≈--- MYA “LCA” = last common ancestor Fossil record of our lineage rich What do we know? 4-5 MYA: chimp-size brain, high sexual dimorphism, and bipedal 2-4 MYA: chimp-size brain, body but not canine dimorphism, bipedal 2 MYA onward: brain size expansion, larger body size, reduced dimorphism, efficient bipedalism, slowed life history, stone tool use Moasic evolution of body, brain, teeth Film clip “Bipeds Evolving” http://digital.films.com.libproxy.temple.edu/PortalViewVideo.aspx?xtid=56001# |
7
|
|
LCA and beyond
Humans shared a common ancestor with chimp/bonobo ≈7 MYA “LCA” =--- Fossil record of our lineage rich What do we know? 4-5 MYA: chimp-size brain, high sexual dimorphism, and bipedal 2-4 MYA: chimp-size brain, body but not canine dimorphism, bipedal 2 MYA onward: brain size expansion, larger body size, reduced dimorphism, efficient bipedalism, slowed life history, stone tool use Moasic evolution of body, brain, teeth Film clip “Bipeds Evolving” http://digital.films.com.libproxy.temple.edu/PortalViewVideo.aspx?xtid=56001# |
last common ancestor
|
|
LCA and beyond
Humans shared a common ancestor with chimp/bonobo ≈7 MYA “LCA” = last common ancestor --- of our lineage rich What do we know? 4-5 MYA: chimp-size brain, high sexual dimorphism, and bipedal 2-4 MYA: chimp-size brain, body but not canine dimorphism, bipedal 2 MYA onward: brain size expansion, larger body size, reduced dimorphism, efficient bipedalism, slowed life history, stone tool use Moasic evolution of body, brain, teeth Film clip “Bipeds Evolving” http://digital.films.com.libproxy.temple.edu/PortalViewVideo.aspx?xtid=56001# |
Fossil record
|
|
Hard Evidence and its limitations
|
The fossil record is invaluable
Geological age of fossils Comparative and functional morphology Biomechanical analysis Complementary evidence (fossilized fauna and flora) Behavior doesn’t fossilize |
|
Types of models
----: choose a living species as a model for our ancestors - ecological similarity – savannah baboons - behavioral similarity – cooperative hunting in lions/wild dogs |
Referential Model
|
|
Types of models
---: use our closest living relatives Strategic models Theoretically grounded (socioecological perspective) to predict or reconstruct extinct hominin behavior |
Phylogenetic Model
|
|
Human life history
---gestation --- interbirth interval |
Long ;Short
|
|
Human life history
---weaning age --- development ---age sexual maturation and age at first birth Menopause |
Early ;Slow;Late
|
|
Human life history
Long gestation Short interbirth interval Early weaning age Slow development Late age sexual maturation and age at first birth Menopause --- life span --- breeding Capacity for --- accumulation |
Long;Cooperative;fat
|
|
Human life history
Long gestation Short interbirth interval Early weaning age Slow development Late age sexual maturation and age at first birth Menopause Long life span Cooperative breeding Capacity for fat accumulation Table 1 Wells, 2011 ABOVE ARE FLEXIBLE DEPENDING ON RESOURCE AVAILABILITY Selective agent favoring such traits? --- |
Modulation of fecundability (flexible responses to resource base)
Reduced mortality…can favor slower life history |
|
Human life history
Long gestation Short interbirth interval Early weaning age Slow development Late age sexual maturation and age at first birth Menopause Long life span Cooperative breeding Capacity for fat accumulation Table 1 Wells, 2011 ABOVE ARE FLEXIBLE DEPENDING ON RESOURCE AVAILABILITY Selective agent favoring such traits? Modulation of fecundability (flexible responses to resource base) Reduced mortality…can favor --- |
slower life history
|
|
Natural Selection in a Stochastic Environment
Selective Pressure ---- cycles with ----oscillations Frequent but unpredictable Options for Response Females sensitive at point of ovulation/conception Phenotypic plasticity Slow down, reduce infant mortality, remain sensitive to resources at conception, more, “hunker down” Speed up, inc. reproduction output when resources good, stack offspring, cooperative breeding, more, “hedge your bets” |
Feast and famines;global climatic
|
|
Natural Selection in a Stochastic Environment
Selective Pressure Feast and famines cycles with global climatic oscillations Frequent but unpredictable Options for Response Females sensitive at point of--- Phenotypic plasticity Slow down, reduce infant mortality, remain sensitive to resources at conception, more, “hunker down” Speed up, inc. reproduction output when resources good, stack offspring, cooperative breeding, more, “hedge your bets” |
ovulation/conception
|
|
Natural Selection in a Stochastic Environment
Selective Pressure Feast and famines cycles with global climatic oscillations Frequent but unpredictable Options for Response Females sensitive at point of ovulation/conception --- Slow down, reduce infant mortality, remain sensitive to resources at conception, more, “hunker down” Speed up, inc. reproduction output when resources good, stack offspring, cooperative breeding, more, “hedge your bets” |
Phenotypic plasticity
|
|
New Understanding
Human brain is more than --- times the expected size for a mammals of our body weight and about --- times the size of that expected based on our great Ape relatives Section by stochastic environments change life history first and paved the way for brain expansion, not the other way around |
6;3
|
|
New Understanding
Human brain is more than 6 times the expected size for a mammals of our body weight and about 3 times the size of that expected based on our great Ape relatives Section by---environments change life history first and paved the way for brain expansion, not the other way around |
stochastic
|
|
New Understanding
Human brain is more than 6 times the expected size for a mammals of our body weight and about 3 times the size of that expected based on our great Ape relatives Section by stochastic environments change life history first and paved the way for --- expansion, not the other way around |
brain
|
|
“Lesser Apes”(Gibbons)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” Unique combination of behaviors highly frugivorous, territorial, stable pair-bonds, regular vocalizations Monomorphic Body size Both sexes---, saber-like canines canines Unique morphology related to “true” brachiation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV-gOL4t9Vk |
large
|
|
“Lesser Apes”(Gibbons)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” Unique combination of behaviors highly frugivorous, territorial, stable pair-bonds, regular vocalizations Monomorphic Body size Both sexes large, saber-like canines canines Unique morphology related to --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV-gOL4t9Vk |
“true” brachiation
|
|
“Lesser Apes” (---)
Retain some OWM features Smaller bodied than other apes Ischial callosities, they sleep sitting up do not make nests like “great apes” Unique combination of behaviors highly frugivorous, territorial, stable pair-bonds, regular vocalizations Monomorphic Body size Both sexes large,--- canines canines Unique morphology related to “true” brachiation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV-gOL4t9Vk |
Gibbons;saber-like
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
--- and --- > leaves than other taxa Terminal branch feeding important |
Symphalangus;Nomascus
|
|
General ecology (Gibbons)
Symphalangus and Nomascus > leaves than other taxa --- branch feeding important |
Terminal
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
--- hands and feet, --- hip joint Quadrumanuous clamboring Males display bi-maturation Results in 2 adult phenotypes “flanged” males unflanged” males |
Long;shallow,
hyperflexible |
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
High level of sexual dimorphism F 80lbs, 2 ½ ft; M 190lbs, 3+ ft SD ratio 2.22:1 Largest primarily arboreal mammal Highly frugivorous Mostly solitary Long hands and feet, shallow, hyperflexible hip joint Quadrumanuous clamboring Males display bi-maturation Results in 2 adult phenotypes ---males --- males |
“flanged” ;unflanged”
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
Long hands and feet, shallow, hyperflexible hip joint --- clamboring Males display bi-maturation Results in 2 adult phenotypes “flanged” males unflanged” males |
Quadrumanuous
|
|
General morphology (Orangutan)
High level of sexual dimorphism F 80lbs, 2 ½ ft; M 190lbs, 3+ ft SD ratio 2.22:1 Largest primarily arboreal mammal Highly frugivorous Mostly solitary Long hands and feet, shallow, hyperflexible hip joint Quadrumanuous clamboring Males display--- Results in 2 adult phenotypes “flanged” males unflanged” males |
bi-maturation
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Nomascus: diploid number, ---chromosomes; sexual dichromatism |
52
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Symphalangus: diploid number, ---chromosomes; largest body size, up to about 15kg |
50
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hoolock: diploid number,---chromosomes; sexual dichromatism |
38
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hylobates: diploid number, --- chromosomes; asexual dichromatism |
44
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hylobates: diploid number, 44 chromosomes; ---dichromatism |
asexual
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Symphalangus: diploid number, 50 chromosomes; --- body size, up to about ---kg |
largest;15
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Nomascus: diploid number, 52 chromosomes; --- dichromatism |
sexual
|
|
Distinctions among Genera (Gibbons)
Hoolock: diploid number, 38 chromosomes; ---dichromatism |
sexual
|