• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/116

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

116 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
A consistent set of characteristics that people display over time and across situations, and that distinguishes individuals from each other.
Personality
Scientific Method
Observe >> Hypothesis >> Test >> Observe >> Revise >> Repeat >>
“Top-down” reasoning.
From the general to the specific
Deductive Reasoning
“Bottom-up” reasoning
From the specific to the general
Inductive Reasoning
What makes a good theory?
*Comprehensive - Will explain various phenomena
*Parsimonious - Explains things concisely
*Falsifiable -Testable
Can be proven incorrect
*Productive- Leads to new predictions
One of the places to first explore the nature of the individual
Theater - Greek and Roman masks, basic archetypal characters.
Theophrastus
Character sketches
Most direct influence to modern personality psychology
Evolutionary Biology
individual characteristics that enabled an organism to pass on genes to offspring become more prevalent in the population over generations”
Evolution
Key contribution of Darwinian evolution
*Freed thinking at the time from assumptions of divine control
*People are subject to laws of nature Thus scientists began to study human behavior systematically
first large scale use of psychological testing
WWII - Used to assign people to units appropriate to their individual profiles and weed out “imbeciles”
These types of questionnaires contributed to development of modern personality and intelligence tests
Began to take shape in 1930’s
Modern Theory
Modern Theory influenced by the work of
Gordon Allport
Kurt Lewin
Henry Murray
Trained in philosophy and the classics

Defined personality as
“the dynamic organization within the individual of those psychophysical systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment”
Gordon Allport
Came out of the Gestalt tradition
“the whole is greater than the sum of its parts”

Looked for systems underlying observable behavior

Emphasized the importance of situational and conditional forces on the individual
Kurt Lewis
Attempted to integrate clinical issues

Defined personality as
“the branch of psychology which principally concerns itself with the study of human lives and the factors which influence their course, [and] individual differences
Henry Murry
Modern View of Personality Theory
Emphasis on the human as a whole
Each person is unique
Individual responses are determined by related forces operating at a given moment
Culture is heavily _______, which....
influential, emphasizes the need to study multiple contexts
In measuring personality, assesments can either be _______ or ___.
objective or subjective
Not dependent on individual making assessment (weight, MC test score)
Objective assessment.
Relies on interpretation by individual making assessment (assessing art)
Subjective assessment
How do we know what makes a good assessment?
Reliability, Validity, Free from bias,
Consistency of scores over time
Reliability
: variations caused by irrelevant chance fluctuations
error variance
Ideally a measure will be low in _____, and therefore _______.
error variance, highly reliable
How can we determine whether a personality test is reliable?
Internal consistency reliability
Test-retest reliability
Degree of consistency between two subparts or equivalent parts of a test. Internally consistent if the scores on each subpart are highly correlated.
Internal Consistency Reliability
Average of all the possible split half correlation coefficients
Statistically a function of item number and their degree of correlation
Should be about a .80
Internal Consistency Reliability
Degree of consistency on different test taking occasions – temporal stability

The scores from each occasion should be highly correlated
Test-Retest Reliability
Does a test truly measure the theoretical construct?
No one technique to establish this...
Construct validity
extent the measure is related to what is should be related to
Convergent validity
Extent the measure is NOT related to what is should not be related to
Discriminant validity
Extent to which a measure predicts a specified outcome criterion (ex: SATs and GPA)
Criterion-related validation
Extent to which a test measures the domain it is supposed to
Content Validity
Response set biases
1. Acquiescence response sets
2. Social desirability response sets
Variety of different methods used to approach measuring personality
Personality Measures
Personality measures:
Self-Report Tests
Q-sort Tests
Ratings/judgments
Biological measures
Behavioral observation
Interviews
Projective Tests
Demographics and Lifestyle
Most common in all of psychology
Easy to administer
Inexpensive
Objective
Self Report
Alternative type of self-report
Person given stack of cards with characteristics, then asked to sort into piles based on a dimension
Q-Sort
Only valid when assessing personality characteristics/dimensions that are observable
Rating and Judgmenet of Others
Franz Joseph Gall
Studied phrenology
Participants record behavior when paged by experimenter at various intervals
sampling method of assessment
Assumes behavior is valid predictor of future behavior
And generally proves true
Behavioural Observation
Most common to psychology interview is ________.
psychotherapeutic interview
Will be variable from person to person and can be subjective
Unstructured Interview
Systematic interview where the interviewer follows specific plan of questions
Increase validity
Structured Interview
Attempt to measure personality through use of a relatively unstructured stimulus, task, or situation
Projective Tests
Most Famous Projective Tests
Rorsharch Test
Biggest problem with Projective Tests:
Scoring is based on examiner’s personal interpretation
Not reliable
Not found to be highly valid either
But could be useful to gain clinical insights
In depth analysis of a single individual
Great for gathering ideas and hypotheses
But need further systematic study to become scientific
Case study design.
Assesses the association between two or more variables
Does not tell us about causal direction
“Correlation does not equal causation”
Correlation Studies
Allows valid causal inferences
Involves random assignment of participants to either a treatment group or control group
Groups receive different levels of an IV and are then compared on the DV.
Conclusion are superior to case or correlation study
In personality research random assignment can be challenging
Results in mostly quasi-experimental studies
Experimental Study
Ego: sense of self
Importance on interaction/conflict with others
Neo-Analytic Approach
Swiss physician
Became interested in psychiatry while studying. Corresponded with Freud. Freud saw him as his heir.
Carl Jung
Structure of personality - (JUNG)
Psyche – essence of the mind; total personality
Complex network on interacting systems striving toward harmony
undifferentiated life energy (JUNG)
Libido
3 Main Systems (JUNG)
Conscious Ego
Personal Unconscious
Collective Unconscious
JUNG'S Conscience Ego
Similar to Freud’s – part of mind that is conscious
Embodies sense of self/feelings of identity
Develops around age 4
The Personal Unconscious (JUNG)
Perceptions, thoughts, feelings that are not conscious but which can be retrieved
Things unimportant at the moment
Information that is repressed
Unique to each individual
A deeper level of unconsciousness that is transpersonal
Shared and common across all people
The Collective Unconscious
No one is purely male or female

Anima: female element of a man

Animus: the male element of a woman
Animus and Anima
Outward appearance vs. inner self

Persona: socially acceptable front presented to others

Shadow: dark socially unacceptable side of personality
Persona and Shadow
Embodies generativity and fertility
Mother
Some of the Best Known Archaetypes
Animus and Anima
Persona and Shadow
Mother
Hero and Demon
Functions of the mind
1. Rational
2. Irrational
Viennese physician
Practicing neurologist and psychiatrist
Alfred Adler (1870-1937)
Invited to join discussion groups with Freud
Groups grew into the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society
Alfred Adler (1870-1937)
Adler’s Theory
Individual Psychology
Unique motivations of people
Person’s perceived niche in society

Emphasis on human culture and society
Concern over social conditions
Adler advocated for children’s rights
The desire to be effective and competent
Core of personality: striving for superiority
Exaggerated feelings of incompetence
Inferiority complex
Exaggerated arrogance developed to overcome feelings of inferiority
Superiority complex
Body attempts to make up for physical weakness
Important motivators for people’s life choices
Organ inferiority
Reaction to perceived helplessness of inferiority
Aggression drive
Individuals attempt to be autonomous
Masculine protest
Everyone must address 3 social issues
Occupational Tasks
Societal Tasks
Love Tasks
Hippocrates and Galen discussed the notion that personality influenced by amount of 4 humors
Yellow bile - choleric temperament
Irritable, low social interest, high activity level
Blood - sanguine temperament
Cheerful, high social interest, high activity level
Black bile - melancholic temperament
Brooding, very low social interest, low activity level
Phlegm - phlegmatic temperament
Lethargic, low social interest, low activity level
Adler’s Personality Typology
Ruling-Dominant
Getting-Learning

Avoiding
Socially Useful
Trained as a medical doctor and psychoanalyst at University of Berlin
Medical school had just began to admit women

Focused on social world/social motivations

She considered theory within Freudian framework
Differences led to her resignation from New York Psychoanalytic Institute
Karen Horney (1885-1952)
Karen Homey's Important Contributions
Importance of family environment
Stressed impact of culture and society
Addressed weaknesses concerning gender differences
Attended art school

Faculty member in Vienna
Met Anna Freud
Interest in psychoanalysis

Underwent psychoanalytic training

Emigrated to America around 1933
Erik Erikson
Personality or “identity” develops into adulthood
Identity Formation

Argued for lifelong process

Developed theory of personality development from a life-span perspective
Erikson's Theory of Identity
Erikson’s Stage Theory
Ego Crisis to be resolved at each stage
8 Stages:
Trust vs Mistrust
Autonomy vs Shame and Doubt
Initiative vs Guilt
Industry vs Inferiority
Identity vs Role Confusion
Intimacy vs Isolation
Generativity vs Stagnation
Ego Integrity vs Despair
First ego crisis (~same period as Oral stage)
Infants needs met by environment  trust and hope

Disruptions  mistrust and abandonment

Crisis unresolved
Difficulty establishing trust throughout life
Trust versus Mistrust (0-1year)
Second ego crisis (~same period as Anal stage)

Learning control over body

Firm but not harsh parenting  make independent decisions

Overly controlling/punitive  feel ashamed, futility, self-doubt
Autonomy versus Shame and Doubt (1-3 years)
Third ego crisis (~same period as Phallic stage)

Successful learn to plan and carry out actions
Sense of direction and purpose

Unsuccessful feel constrained and guilt; una pursue
Crisis unresolved
Low self-confidence, cannot take initiative/make
Initiative vs. Guilt (3-6 years)
Fourth ego crisis (~same time as latency period)

Task completion – academic tasks

Successful problem solve; pride in accomplishment

Unsuccessful feel inferior, incompetent
Industry vs. Inferiority
Fifth ego crisis (~same period as Genital stage)
Identity crisis: uncertainty about abilities, goals, associations
Tries to integrate identities
Who they are, what they want to become

Successful clear multifaceted sense of self

Unsuccessful perpetual confusion about future or adult roles
Identity versus Role Confusion (Adolescence)
Sixth ego crisis

Learning to interact deeply with others and seek companionship

Successful develop deep and intimate relationships – love

Unsuccessful social isolation and loneliness
Intimacy versus Isolation (Young Adulthood)
Seventh ego crisis

Giving of self; looking to future generations

Successful children; community service

Unsuccessful feeling life is worthless/boring
Generativity versus Stagnation (Middle Adulthood)
Eighth ego crisis

Reflection on life experiences

Successful find meaning and sense that life was worthwhile

Unsuccessful sense of despair and fear of death
Ego Integrity versus Despair (Old Age)
Importance of positive/goal-oriented nature of humanity

Incorporates impact of society, culture, and interpersonal interaction on personality

Focus includes non-clinical population

Expands personality development through adulthood
Advantages of Neo-analytic/ego aspects of personality
Shifted away from biology

Still very difficult to test empirically

Concepts heavily philosophical

Concepts too abstract and/or vague
Limitations of Neo-analytic/ego aspects of personality
John Locke – Tabula Rasa
Nurture
4 basic aspects of Temperament
Activity
Emotionality
Sociability
Impulsivity
Nervous System temperament
Used factor analysis to look at personality traits
Eysenck
All traits can be broken down into two dimensions:
Neuroticism
Extraversion-Introverson
Sensitivity of sympathetic nervous system
Fight or flight response - (Eysenck’s Temperament)
Neuroticism
Importance of genetically passed on characteristics
Natural Selection - Darwin
Attempt to understand evolutionary process that led to the development of the human mind.
Very difficult to pinpoint precise causes
Evolutionary personality theory
Defect chromosome 15
Happy, easily excitable, hyperactivity
Angelman Syndrome
Missing 2 dozen genes on chromosome 7
Excessively social, unguarded
Williams Syndrome
Studied family trees
Noticed that eminence ran in families
Recognized the impact of family status
Suggested studying the adopted
Including adopted twins
Began eugenics movement
Sir Francis Galton
Why study twins?
One of the best ways to tease out genes versus environment

Shared variance
Non-shared variance
For any given trait, we have a genetic potential/predisposition

Environment stretches what is built in

Ex: Schizophrenia and homosexuality
Concordance rate in MZ 50%
Cannot be a direct genetic cause
Environment impacts the rest
Stern’s Rubberband Hypothesis
Cat experiment
Important work in sensation
Implications for human development
Hubel and Weisel
Causes Mood swings and mental disturbances
Mercury poisoning
Can lead to deviant, antisocial behavior
Lead poisoning
Manganese poisoning
Compulsive fighting
Brain deterioration – right frontal lobe
Changes in sense of self
Change in beliefs, values, and preferences
Pick’s disease
Changes depending on area of the brain
Stroke
Railroad construction worker
Accident caused severe damage to prefrontal cortex of the brain
Survived but suffered drastic personality change
Before accident: responsible, hard working
After: child-like behavior, profane, unacceptable behavior, loss of social inhibition, “no longer Gage”
Phineas Gage
Idea that body type relates to personality
Somatotypes
Muscular, large-boned and athletic types
Mesomorph
Slender, book-worm type
Ectomorph
Overweight, jolly and good-natured type
Endomorph
1st and 5th grade
Given “The Harvard Test”
Measures “late bloomers”
Gave teacher list of children’s names
Randomly selected
Tested again at end of the school year
Students on the list showed largest gains achieved
Effect bigger in 1st grade
5th graders have sense of self and reputation
Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968)