• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Socrates 3 main points?
1. People can do no lasting harm
2. obligation to laws
3.necessity of living well and being just
2 reasons Hume rejects contract theory
1.
Rawls 2 responses to Hume
contract doesn't need to be foundational. Can attend to basic needs of society
2. Difference b/w what people will live with before actively revolting.
Rawls 2 principles
some rights should be inviolable
,reasonable expected to be everyone's advantage
6 thinkers and what they do
socrates:introduces concept of mutual obligation
hobbes:gov exists for mutual benefit existence relies on this
Rousseau:better social contract
Hume:contract is bull
rawls: contemporary contract theory
Locke: gov limited to specific ends and can be overthrown
Socrates 3 main ideas
1.populace can do no lasting good or harm
2. The necessity of living well and being just
3. The problem between people and the laws
2 reasons Hume rejects social contract theory
original contract lost with time, history indicates that government has foundation in usurpation and conquest.
power vs violence
power is a manifestation of people together through consent, power gives government legitimacy. Violence is defined by instrumental character, without power you can't exercise violence.