• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/156

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

156 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Social choices

Activities in which people must act collectively


(Highways, Parks, ect.)

Collective Action Problems

Prisoners' Dilemma, Free Riding, Principal-Agent, Tragedy of the Commons

Politics

The process through which individuals and groups reach agreement on a course of collective action (if no politics, then war)

Institutions

Established laws, practices, and organizations designed to make and enforce collective agreements

Authority v. Power

Authority: The acknowledged right to take action


Power: One's actual influence over others

Cost of institutions

Transactions


Conformity

Authoritarian

Autocracy - Rule by one person (North Korea, Brunei)


Oligarchy - Rule by a handful of powerful elites (Saudi Arabia, China)


Theocracy - A state ruled by religious authority (Iran)



Democracy

popular sovereignty


protection of rights


(only 25 fully democratic countries)



Constitutions

establish "rule of law" in society


Provide basics of policy making (how law is made and by whom)


Outline responsibilities of gov't institutions


Determine who is eligible to serve in government positions

The Founding

Look at notes

Political Philosophy and Democratic Governance

Look at notes

Constitutional Convention

1787, delegates meet to fix articles


combine strong national government with protections of individual liberty

Issues for Debate (Constitution)

Strength of Central Government (similar v different)


Representation of the Legislature (large states want population, small want equal)


Slavery and representation (slave states v free)

Strengthening the National Government

expressed powers specifically described in the constitution (Article I, Section 8)


Elastic clause - allows congress to pass all laws that are "necessary and proper" to carry out enumerated power


supremacy clause - federal laws trump state and local laws (states do have explicit protections and reserved powers)

Legislative Representation

Virginia plan - bicameral legislature. both chambers by population (one away from pop). single independent executive appointed by legislature


New Jersey Plan - unicameral legislature appointed by the states (equal rep). single independent executive appointed by legislature

connecticut compromise

-bicameral legislature


-upper chamber (senate) appointed by states equal representation


-lower chamber (house) directly elected by people, proportional to population


-single, independent executive elected by stat legislatures through the electoral college

slavery

major issue at convention


abolition not viable


compromises allowed convention to succeed, but set country on path to civil war


3/5 compromise

amending the constitution

more flexible than articles


two paths:


-2/3 of each legislative chamber, plus 3/4 of state legislatures


-2/3 of state legislatures can call for convention; proposed amendments need 3/4 of state legislatures

federalists

-property owners, creditors, merchants


-elites should govern. worry about "excessive democracy" "pluralism"


-strong national government


-alexander hamilton, james madison, washington

antifederalists

-small farmers, frontiersmen, debtors, shopkeepers


-elites dangerous. government should be closer to the people


-state power. individual power.


-patrick henry, george mason

federalist papers

-written by james madison, alexander hamilton, and john jay


-outlined arguments that institutions were necessary to solve collective dilemmas


-checks and balances would constrain government


-countered by "antifederalist papers"

popular sovereignty rules! (but not too much...)

-president is chosen by electoral college # electors = # senators and house members in state and states decide how to choose their electors and allocate their electoral votes


-senators chosen by state legislature until 17th amendment (1913) changes to popular vote as part of progressive era election reforms


-house members by popular vote


-states decide who is eligible to vote.

balance majority rule and individual rights?

congress makes law but the president executes and enforces is. president is commander in chief but congress funds the military



checks and balances

congress passes laws but president can veto and it requires 2/3 congress to override. judiciary interprets law, judicial review

bill of rights

added to address criticisms of anti-federalists


rhode island did not ratify the constitution until may 1790

bill of rights

check it out!

living constitution

we need to adapt the principles and values of the constitution to changing social situations. the constitution is not a suicide pact.

original intent

the constitution represents the rules for society. we can't just change them. writing a constitution is an extraordinary act.




document is short and vague. meaning has changed (laws). presidential authority has grown, especially in foreign policy. central power has grown.

how democratic is the american constitution?

dahl

federalism

division of power between on central government and several smaller, regional governments

constitutions full faith and credit clause

states are to recognize actions and decisions taken in other states and legal and proper

the privileges and immunities clause

a state cannot discriminate against someone from another state or give special privileges to its own residents

state governemetns

similar in structure to federal government (bicameral) (gubernatorial powers vary)


key distinction is presence of direct democracy - initiative, referendum, recall

local governments

not granted any power


creations of state leg. and state constitutions


states have given larger cities in their states home rule: guarantee of noninterference in local affairs


more variation



mayoral

large citis, mayor has considerable power



concil-manager

small to medium cities

commission

declining in number due to collective action problems

special districts

DC

designed to avoid having the capital in any one state


retrocession of land donated by aleandria and virginia


authority resides with congress (home rule since 1973, no voting representation in congress, non voting delegate)


Not an example of federalism

US Federal System

1 us government


50 state governments


89,476 local governments

Federalism


most laws in the us are state laws, differences across states can be significant

confederation

-system of shared powers between two or more levels of government


-lower-level governments retain sovereignty


-national government cannot compel action

unitary system

-system of central government has all the power


-lower level governments (if any) answer to the central government


-lower level governments are administrative only

dual federalism

layer cake

shared/cooperative federalism

marble cake



strengths of federalism

political and cultural differences


logistics


democratic laboratories

weaknesses of federalism

confusion


inequality


collective action problems


coordination


tragedy of the commons


race to the bottom



medicare

federal program


helps pay medical expenses for the elderly


same for everyone age 65+

medicaid

federal program administered by the states


helps pay medical expenses for the poor


varies by state, 50 different "medicaid" programs

progressive era

(1896-1913) This era saw major expansion of federal gov't


regulate food safety, medicine, and clothing


breakup of monopolies in oil and utilities


16th amendment: Federal Income tax


17th: direct election of senators

expansion of federal power

new deal

(1930s)


comprehensive set of economic regulations and relief programs intended to fight the great depression


FDR invoked the commerce clause

great society

(1960s)


war on poverty as part of the johnson administration great society agenda


more than a hundred new programs, the largest of which was medicaid


subsidized state programs and implemented national goals

lobbying easier to coordinate at federal level

it is difficult to lobby persuade 50 separate state legislatures


congress can be ore efficient as a single federal law can change policy in all 50 states at once


the national government may be more receptive to change although the opposite could be the case (Same-Sex marriage)

SCOTUS as Arbitrator

the supreme court resolves conflicts between federal and state governments and in the process creates powerful precedents:


McCulloch v Maryland (1819) states can't tax federal government


Gibbons v Ogden (1824( Interstate commerce


Griswold v Connecticut (1965) Right to Privacy


Roe v Wade (1973)


US v Lopez (1995) overturn parts of Gun Free School Zones, retrenchment of federal power

Modern Federalism: The Carrot

Block grants: state government or local government receives a specific amount of money to spend for some purpose


state government or local government can expand the program, but pay the additional costs


little incentive to control costs, but a disincentive to do more



matching grants

federal government matches money spent by states in a policy area, generally between a 1:1 and 1:4 ratio.


more likely to lead to program expansion

Unfunded Mandates

states are required to administer poles to which they may object


states ma be asked to pay for the administration of the poles


crosscutting requirements apply certain rules and guidelines to many federally subsidized state programs


direct orders are requirements that can be enforced by legal and civil penalties

party

a coalition of poepl who form a united front to win control of government and implement policy

united front

a bundle is stronger than an individual stick


how big of a bundle?


-minimal winning coalition


-large enough to win


-small enough to not dilute the spoils

long coalitions

agenda control

the "hastert rule": the job of the speaker is not to expedite legislation that runs counter to the wishes of a majority of the majority... on each piece of legislation, i actively seek to bring our party together


positive v negative agenda control

party in government

start in government


need to coordinate to pass laws


pass better laws if you coordinate

party in elections

easier to coordinate/win with more people like you


elect like-minded people


mobilize voters

Party and organization

build an organization


need to coordinate campaigns and legislation


need permanent organization. caucus changes. candidates change

Party Identification

A stable orientation toward a political party


in the us, party identificatio can be important party of society


generally speaking, what do you think of yourself as?

Political Socialization

parents school and community

events and experience

big events: great depression makes a generation of democrats southerners move to rep party in civil rights era


evaluations of candidates, officeholder, and economic conditions


2 strongest republican age cohorts are voters who entered electorate when eisenhower or reagan were president

habiit

repeated voting for one party reinforces tendency to stick with that party over time. youth more likely to support independent candidates on move parties than older generations

third parties

democrats and republicans

big broad coalitions


consists of relatively like-minded members on economic and social policy

domestic policy

democrats: capitalist but government has a role in reducing inequality, protecting those who cannot copete protecting consumers and advancing the common interest


Republicans: Capitalist, governement intervention in the economy reduces individual liberty. government regulation hurts innovation

Social policy

democrats: defend individual expression, accept changing norms in society, support historically-disadvantaged social groups.


republican: support established social values, government has a role in defending christian-judeo values.

foreign policy

strong competing factions within each party,disagreements are often more pronounced between branches of government rather than parties

Race

the largest voting divide in american politics.


republican coalition relies on white voters who are shrinking part of the electorate


1980 reagan won 56% white voters and defeated carter 51-41%


2012 Romney won 59% white voters and lost 47-51%


1980 white voters 88% all voters 2012 72%

gender gap

education and class

lower income favor democrats and upper income favor republicans


education varies, lowest and highest elves education favor democrats college graduates in 2012 voted republican

geographic sorting

people are sorting into areas with like-minded voters


democrats in urban areas with more youth, minorities, and college-educated


republicans rural areas more white and conservative


elections are won in the suburbs and exurbs. inner suburbs are wealthier and more divers = more democratic. exurbs whiter and more conservative

wealth and congress

congress run by rich people seeing to gain more benefit for themselves subject to corruption by special interests


median net worth 966,000 48% are millionaires


freshman 1,066,515


STOCK act to rebut criticism for insider trading

Descriptive representation

an elected body should resemble a representative sample of the voters they are meant to represent concerning outward characteristics

substantive representation

just ideas

trustee

deliberate to come to a conclusion that is good for the nation as a whole, make their own opinion

delegate

regurgitates information from constituents

US Delegate Model

Frequent elections from geographic districts encourages members to act as delegates for district interests

Dahl and Representation

Majoritarian vs Proportional


Alternatives to winner take all

Majoritarian

encourages disproportinality


makes for better accountability

proportional

everyone gets equally represented, microcosm of constituency

runoff

preferential voting (instant runoff)

proportional representation

If 30% of the electorate support a particular political party, then roughly 30% of seats will be won by that party.

PR plus single member districts

Microcosm of Society?

Wasp age 57 house 62 senate


law, business, public service


only 25 doctors, 5 nurses

Race and Gender Diversity

AA 13.1%-----9.2%,2


H 16.7%-------7.6%,3


W 50.8%-------17.7%, 20


Most minorities serve in majority/minority districts protected by voting rights act

Voting Rights Act

1982: no dilution of representation and protect ability to elect representatives of their choice


1990 census increase # these districts. 102-103 congress from 27-29 AA, 10-17 H


senate favors small rural states

Gender

Women served as placeholders


60-70s more on their own


90s gap bw dems and reps


incumbency slows entry of new groups


less likely to consider themselves qualified to run


not much voter bias anymore (social welfare issues) urban racially diverse and higher income


family responsibilities

Diversity Impact

descriptive representatives bring better substantive representation?


roll model effect


stronger effects


little increase in trust in gov't


new issues group interests


more aggressive advocates for group interests


democrats

voter turnout

VEP 57.5%


press years <60%


midterm <40%




MN, WI, CO, NH, IA, ME, VA, MA 70-60%




HI, WV, OK, TX, AR, TN 50%

demographics

ed, income, age, region, political efficacy, social connectedness, partisan strenght

registration requirements

70% of eligible voters registered

electoral reform

easy registration requirements: motor voter law, help america vote act, election day registration, early voting, no fault absentee ballots, voting by mail


compulsory voting


preventing voter fraud: id limits rights of minorities, poor, old, youth

Polarization

overstated, average are less polarized


elites are polarized, voters forced to choose


(makes it easier for public to see difference between parties and make a choice)

youth

shift to democrats?


More divers


less religious


liberal



the paradox

rich states lean democratic while rich people republican. poor states lean republican, poor people vote democratic


about culture, not economics


large among wealthy voters


low income voters differences are much smaller

Polarization

parties are competing for states and reinforcing the divide.


liberal democrats in wealthy sttaes voting against economic interests


wealthy in poor red states are not conflicted at all, hens the high slope

Nominations

coordination of voters

problem: coordinating voters, get everyone on the same side


solution: narrow choices. parties need to choose one nominee

nominational tradeoff

popularity with activists and probability of victory in general election


"best candidate who can win"

Professionals (pragmatists)

care about whole party


want to win and are willing to compromise


particularistic benefits from party

purists or ideologues

care about policy goals


care more about winning with the right candidate


get instrumental benefits form the party

Best person

correct of policy


loyal to the party


good leader


politician



whoh can win

not too extreme


charismatic


good campaigner



narrowing the solutions

parties need control of their own nomination

control of nomination

problem: open primaries and strategic voting


look at notes


solution: conventions

conentions

parties began to settle on their nominee before the convention

reform

mcgovern-fraser commission (1968-1972)

superdelegates

18-20% dem


6% rep

post reform

1972 McGovern wins the system he designed


1976 Carter campaigns in every primary


not able to work with own party



The Invisible primary

electoral college

house districts + two senate seats


states may decide how to choose electors


voting for electors committed to candidate of your choice


all of the electors committed to them are elected to electoral college (after pop vote win) (ec ME NB)


formally vote for candidate in capitols


270 of 538 is new press

Implication #1

two party system reinforced

#2

swing states



criticism

small states have an advantage


the popular vote winner can lose the election


high turnout states are disadvantaged


faithless electors (electoral college not voting who they said they would)


contingency elections



congressional elections

senate


the founders


terms and timing


qualifications

house

qualifications


redistricting


frequency


three rules that states must follow



gerrymandering

cracking


packing


current status



incumbency

the fenno paradox: support your own congressman, hate congress

incumbents lose?

scandal


competitive district


redistricting


national factors: coattails, unpopular pres, balancing

choosing to run

open seat


vulnerable incumbent


ability to fundraise


relationship with party

chronic low turnout in US

60% of eligible pop votes. 62% 2008

voting is costly

logic of voting

reducing cost should increase participation

total spending

dems: candidates spend more, more fundraising


national party spends the same


reps, outside spending more

source of donations

dems, small contributions and large individual


reps, less

criticisms

politicians who raise the most win, favors incumbents


politicians spend too much time fundraising, not enough governing


creates corruption candidates serve their donors


increases influence of rich



history of campaign finance

current system a reaction to watergate and corrupt fundraising practices


federal election campaign act


donations are regulated and must be reported Federal Election Commission

Rederal Election Campaign Act (1971)

Candidates; individual contributions limits, personal funding limits, total campaign speeding limits


party contribution limits


Political Action Committees


Federal election commission



Hard Money

Individual can donate up to 2500 to a candidate per election. Political Action Committees can donate 5000 per election, individuals can donate 5000 per year to PAC



Soft money

less regulated unlimited donations that used to go to parties and now go to outside groups that can not legally coordinate with the campaign

Buckley v Valeo (1976)

supreme court says personal funding limits & total campaign spending limits are unconstitutional


individual contribution limis & party contribution limits remain in place today

Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act

NcCain-Feingold Act


Reaction to rise of soft money, unlimited donations for party building


proliferation of issue ads by outside groups distorting candidate messages


raised hard money limits and tied to inflation


banned soft money to parties


regulated issue ads

public opinion

expressed opinions reflect underlying attitudes

attitude

an organized and consistent manner of thinking feeling and reacting with regard to people

how to measure public opinion

a simple random sample gives and unbiased estimate, and you know the sampling error of that estimate


1200 needed for a nationally representative sample with 3% margin of error

early attempts

straw polls

biases in polls

self-selection


phones


nonresponse




question wording, priming, and framing

Received messages from political elites

highly attentive are more likely to be exposed to new messages


also more likely to resist novel new messages


resist unfriedly sources

Interest Groups

pluralist theory

can't stop factions so must control their effects by having a large republic. will be too many different interests for them to effectively combine and subvert the public good. no one interest can always dominate. gives voice to more interests in a 2 party system

elitist theory

groups with more power and resources have easier time organizing biases public policy in favor of those groups

economic

most common


Labor Unions, American Medical Associatino

Citizen Activist g

public interest, single issue, ideological groups


Nation right to Life, Sunlight Foundation

Government-Related

National Governors Association

Interest group expansion

60s+70s


electoral reforms encourages donations to candidates


new deal and great society expands federal gov't programs and regulations


tech change


open gov't

Plato's Philosopher-Kings

Hobbes Popular Sovereignty and Monarchy

Locke Limited Governemtn & Protection of Rights to Life, Liberty and Property