Pl 181

Front 1

Provides a universal moral foundation for the codes of ethics that guide professional practice in settings where professionals must interact with clients who have diverse background moral beliefs, religions, and cultural traditions

Back 1

Moral Point of View

Front 2

commitments we hold that make us think of some things as right and other things as wrong or some things as morally good and others as morally bad

Back 2

Moral Values

Front 3

A system of shared intersubjective norms that give all members mutually understood expectations of how they ought to treat one another

Back 3

Community Morality

Front 4

Provide the motivation for social actions

Back 4

Moral Emotions

Front 5

Will make sense at the intersubjective level of public understanding (or as Smith says below, will be to the “good-liking” of others)

Back 5

Good Decisions

Front 6

A being that must give an account of its actions to some other, and that consequently must regulate them according to the good liking of this other

Back 6

Accountable Being

Front 7

Rules and principles created for smaller institutional groups and their specific office holders

Back 7

Ethical Codes

Front 8

The shared intersubjective norms that prescribe how members of a tribe, community, or nation ought to behave

Back 8

Community Morality

Front 9

Prescribes rights and duties for everyone, no matter what their station or office in life

Back 9

Universal Morality

Front 10

(1) meet publicly acknowledged rational standards, (2) satisfy conditions of universality, (3) be self critical rather than ideological, and (4) promote generalized empathy and respect among all people

Back 10

Impartial Moral Point of View

Front 11

the process of training a person to become a fit member of a social group

Back 11

Socialization

Front 12

the process of being educated into a way of life

Back 12

Enculturation

Front 13

To unconsciously internalize values that originated externally

Back 13

Introjection

Front 14

Little reason to reflect on the nature of value differences, and no comparative basis from which to criticize the sources of introjection that gave members their traditional values

Back 14

Tribal Ethics

Front 15

Fundamental moral beliefs are treated as so sacred that ordinary citizens are prohibited from evaluating or judging them

Back 15

Taboos

Front 16

Assume that the values are of the same logical type and that it is appropriate to lump them together in an "absolute bag" to be obeyed without question.

Back 16

Bag of Virtues

Front 17

There are no reasons that can explain and justify the values

Back 17

Arbitrary

Front 18

All the special duties (and rights) that apply to people who move into an institutional setting to take responsibility for the specific social roles defined in the settings code

Back 18

Duties of Station

Front 19

The way these settings function is determined by the shared expectations of everyone in the setting

Back 19

Intersubjective

Front 20

Functional members develop shared intersubjective procedural expectations about how a person who performs social actions in the setting ought to behave

Back 20

Social Settings

Front 21

Published guidelines that regulate people’s behavior within particular institutional settings

Back 21

Codes of Ethics

Front 22

Other things being equal

Back 22

Ceteris Paribus

Front 23

Any rule governed relationship

Back 23

Institution

Front 24

Requires us to point to the rule that governs the situation

Back 24

Justification of a Claim

Front 25

Emotional commitment to legitimate ends or rules of conduct

Back 25

Integrity

Front 26

Believe that commitment to community has priority over individualism

Back 26

Communitarians

Front 27

Appropriate visceral responses to situations governed by duties and obligations

Back 27

Moral Emotions

Front 28

The capacity adults have to restrain their selfish inclinations in order to do what is right or to allow their benevolent feelings to have priority

Back 28

Self-Command

Front 29

Prescribe intersubjective reasons for acting. They both explain and justify rules and actions to other members of the community

Back 29

Moral Principles

Front 30

Exists temporarily when a tribal member enters a rite of passage that allows him/her to take on a new tribal role

Back 30

Liminality

Front 31

1. Esoteric knowledge not available to all; 2. National organization – code of ethics; 3. Serve an important social value so licensed by the state; 4. Extra strong moral commitment to the social value served.

Back 31

Characteristics of Professionals

Front 32

Investigate how justified abstract ideals can be applied at lower and lower concrete levels to help resolve the kinds of value conflicts that arise in local contexts

Back 32

Applied Ethics

Front 33

Intersubjective attempt to find a theoretical justification of universal norms

Back 33

Justification Discourse

Front 34

To figure out how to intelligently apply the ideals to diverse concrete situations

Back 34

Application Discourse

Front 35

Everyone ought to act to promote his or her own best interest

Back 35

Ethical Egoism

Front 36

Everyone ought to act to promote the greatest amount of happiness for everyone

Back 36

Utilitiarianism

Front 37

Everyone ought to act in accordance with everyone's inalienable, indefeasible natural rights

Back 37

Natural Rights Theory

Front 38

Everyone ought to act in accordance with the principles that would be chosen if free and equal rational people were to enter a social contract to establish a moral community

Back 38

Social Contract Theory

Front 39

Everyone ought to always treat people as ends unto themselves and
never use them as a means only

Back 39

Kantian Duty Ethics

Front 40

Just those action norms are valid to which all possibly affected persons could agree as participants in rational discourses

Back 40

Discourse Ethics